Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Metal ion levels and functional results after either resurfacing hip arthroplasty or conventional metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Modern metal-on-metal hip resurfacing was introduced as a bone-preserving method of joint reconstruction for young and active patients; however, the large diameter of the bearing surfaces is of concern for potentially increased metal ion release. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 71 patients (< 65 years old) were randomly assigned to receive either a resurfacing (R) hip arthroplasty (n = 38) or a conventional metal-on-metal (C) hip arthroplasty (n = 33). Functional outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at 6, 12, and 24 months. Cobalt and chromium blood levels were analyzed preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS: All functional outcome scores improved for both groups. At 12 and 24 months, the median UCLA activity score was 8 in the R patients and 7 in the C patients (p < 0.05). At 24 months, OHS was median 16 in C patients and 13 in R patients (p < 0.05). However, in spite of randomization, UCLA scores also appeared to be higher in R patients at baseline. Satisfaction was similar in both groups at 24 months. Cobalt concentrations were statistically significantly higher for R patients only at 3 and 6 months. Chromium levels remained significantly higher for R patients until 24 months. No pseudotumors were encountered in either group. One R patient was revised for early aseptic loosening and in 2 C patients a cup insert was exchanged for recurrent dislocation. INTERPRETATION: R patients scored higher on UCLA, OHS, and satisfaction at some time points; however, as for the UCLA, preoperative levels were already in favor of R. The differences, although statistically significant, were of minor clinical importance. Chromium blood levels were statistically significantly higher for R patients at all follow-up measurements, whereas for cobalt this was only observed up to 6 months. The true value of resurfacing hip arthroplasty over conventional metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty will be determined by longer follow-up and a possible shift of balance between their respective (dis)advantages.

SUBMITTER: Smolders JM 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3242952 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Metal ion levels and functional results after either resurfacing hip arthroplasty or conventional metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.

Smolders José M H JM   Hol Annemiek A   Rijnberg Willard J WJ   van Susante Job L C JL  

Acta orthopaedica 20111001 5


<h4>Background</h4>Modern metal-on-metal hip resurfacing was introduced as a bone-preserving method of joint reconstruction for young and active patients; however, the large diameter of the bearing surfaces is of concern for potentially increased metal ion release.<h4>Patients and methods</h4>71 patients (< 65 years old) were randomly assigned to receive either a resurfacing (R) hip arthroplasty (n = 38) or a conventional metal-on-metal (C) hip arthroplasty (n = 33). Functional outcomes were ass  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3216077 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3639332 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5264575 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4105764 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5525522 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC2505207 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC8113959 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9376798 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6844433 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6718187 | biostudies-literature