Dataset Information

Effect of diindolylmethane supplementation on low-grade cervical cytological abnormalities: double-blind, randomised, controlled trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Cervical screening identifies many women with low-grade abnormalities. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that diindolylmethane (DIM) could potentially halt (cervical) carcinogenesis. We report on a randomised controlled trial of the effect of DIM in women with low-grade cervical cytological abnormalities.

Methods

We conducted a pragmatic double-blind, randomised controlled trial of 150 mg DIM (from BioResponse DIM) or placebo daily for 6 months in women with newly diagnosed, low-grade cytological abnormalities. Randomisation was in the ratio 2 (DIM) to 1 (placebo). All women were invited for colposcopy at 6 months with biopsy of any abnormality.

Results

Of the 551 randomised women available for analysis, 9% on DIM and 12% on placebo had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia-2 (CIN2) or worse after 6-month supplementation (risk ratio (RR) 0.7 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4-1.2)), whereas 4.6% and 5.1%, respectively, had CIN3 or worse (RR 0.9 (95% CI: 0.4-2.0)). A total of 27.3% of women on DIM and 34.3% on placebo had no sign of disease (negative cytology, colposcopy and human papilloma virus (HPV) tests) at 6 months (RR 0.8 (95% CI: 0.6-1.0)). Of those HPV-positive at baseline, 69% (114 out of 166) of the DIM group were positive at 6 months compared with 61% (43 out of 71) of the placebo group: RR 1.1 (95% CI: 0.9-1.4). Diindolylmethane supplementation was well tolerated.

Conclusion

The results suggest that short-term DIM supplementation (150 mg day(-1)) is well tolerated, but is unlikely to have an effect on cytology or HPV infection. Uncertainty remains regarding its effect on CIN2+.

SUBMITTER: Castanon A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3251847 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Large numbers of women who participate in cervical screening require follow-up for minor cytological abnormalities. Little is known about the psychological consequences of alternative management policies for these women. We compared, over 30-months, psychosocial outcomes of two policies: cytological surveillance (repeat cervical cytology tests in primary care) and a hospital-based colposcopy examination.Women attending for a routine cytology test within the UK NHS Cervical Screening Programmes were eligible to participate. 3399 women, aged 20-59 years, with low-grade abnormal cytology, were randomised to cytological surveillance (six-monthly tests; n = 1703) or initial colposcopy with biopsies and/or subsequent treatment based on colposcopic and histological findings (n = 1696). At 12, 18, 24 and 30-months post-recruitment, women completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). A subgroup (n = 2354) completed the Impact of Event Scale (IES) six weeks after the colposcopy episode or first surveillance cytology test. Primary outcomes were percentages over the entire follow-up period of significant depression (? 8) and significant anxiety (? 11; "30-month percentages"). Secondary outcomes were point prevalences of significant depression, significant anxiety and procedure-related distress (? 9). Outcomes were compared between arms by calculating fully-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for initial colposcopy versus cytological surveillance.There was no significant difference in 30-month percentages of significant depression (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.80-1.21) or anxiety (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.81-1.16) between arms. At the six-week assessment, anxiety and distress, but not depression, were significantly less common in the initial colposcopy arm (anxiety: 7.9% vs 13.4%; OR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.38-0.81; distress: 30.6% vs 39.3%, OR = 0.67 95% CI 0.54-0.84). Neither anxiety nor depression differed between arms at subsequent time-points.There was no difference in the longer-term psychosocial impact of management policies based on cytological surveillance or initial colposcopy. Policy-makers, clinicians, and women themselves can be reassured that neither management policy has a significantly greater psychosocial cost.Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN 34841617.

Project description:AimsThe burden and health costs of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus continue to increase globally and prevention strategies in at-risk people need to be explored. Previous work, in both animal models and humans, supports the role of zinc in improving glucose homeostasis. We, therefore, aimed to test the effectiveness of zinc supplementation on glycaemic control in pre-diabetic adults.MethodsWe conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial across 10 General Practitioner (GP) practices in NSW, Australia. The trial is known as Zinc in Preventing the Progression of pre-Diabetes (ZIPPeD)Study. Pre-diabetic (haemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] 5.7-6.4%, 39-46 mmol/mol) men and women (N = 98) were all assigned to a free state government telephone health coaching service (New South Wales Get Healthy Information and Coaching Service) and then randomised to either daily 30 mg zinc gluconate or placebo. Blood tests were collected at baseline, 1, 6 and 12 months for the primary outcomes (HbA1c, fasting blood glucose (FBG)); secondary outcomes included Homeostasis Model Assessment 2 (HOMA 2) parameters, lipids, body weight, height, waist circumference, blood pressure and pulse.ResultsThe baseline-adjusted mean group difference at 6 months, expressed as treatment-placebo, (95% CI) was -0.02 (-0.14, 0.11, p = 0.78) for HbA1c and 0.17 (-0.07, 0.42; p = 0.17) for FBG, neither of which were statistically significant. There were also no significant differences between groups in any of the secondary outcomes. Zinc was well tolerated, and compliance was high (88%).ConclusionWe believe our results are consistent with other Western clinical trial studies and do not support the use of supplemental zinc in populations with a Western diet. There may still be a role for supplemental zinc in the developing world where diets may be zinc deficient.Trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12618001120268. Registered on 6 July 2018.

Project description:Cervical cancer is a leading cause of death among women worldwide, particularly in Indonesia. The main treatment of advanced-stage cervical cancer is radiation; however, the outcomes do not meet the required expectations. [1,7-Bis(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-1,6-heptadiene-3,5dione] has been reported in several studies for its potency in cancer therapy. This study aims to investigate the clinical and molecular [(malondialdehyde (MDA) and NF-κB levels] effects, apoptotic index, and safety of Biocurcumin (BCM-95) as a radiosensitiser in cervical cancer. In this double-blind placebo randomised-controlled trial, we randomised 121 patients into 2 groups (BCM-95 or placebo). MDA and their NF-κB levels and apoptotic index were measured before and after administering 24 Gy of radiation. MDA was identified using Wills' method, whereas NF-κB was identified via ELISA. The apoptotic index was identified using TUNEL and DAPI staining. The clinical response was classified based on the RECIST. MDA levels before radiation were similar between both groups in per protocol and intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses (p = 0.53 and p = 0.16, respectively). After radiation, MDA levels increased in both groups with no significant differences in per protocol and ITT analyses (p = 0.52 and p = 0.18, respectively). NF-κB levels before radiation were similar between the two groups in per protocol and ITT analyses (p = 0.92 and p = 0.98, respectively). After radiation, the BCM-95 group showed an increase in the NF-κB levels compared with the placebo group in per protocol analysis but not in ITT analysis (p = 0.018 and p = 0.42, respectively). The BCM-95 group had a higher apoptotic index before radiation in per protocol analysis but not in ITT analysis (p = 0.01 and p = 0.61, respectively). After radiation, the apoptotic index remained higher in the BCM-95 group in per protocol analysis but not in ITT analysis (p = 0.04 and p = 0.91, respectively). There was no significant difference in complete response between the groups (per protocol, p = 0.61; ITT analysis, p = 0.90). Although BCM-95 can regulate ROS, NF-κB, and apoptosis in human cervical cancer, it is not significant. Therefore, BCM-95 does not improve clinical response to radiation treatment.