Dataset Information

Source cancellation profiles of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography.

ABSTRACT: Recorded electric potentials and magnetic fields due to cortical electrical activity have spatial spread even if their underlying brain sources are focal. Consequently, as a result of source cancellation, loss in signal amplitude and reduction in the effective signal-to-noise ratio can be expected when distributed sources are active simultaneously. Here we investigate the cancellation effects of EEG and MEG through the use of an anatomically correct forward model based on structural MRI acquired from 7 healthy adults. A boundary element model (BEM) with four compartments (brain, cerebrospinal fluid, skull and scalp) and highly accurate cortical meshes (~300,000 vertices) were generated. Distributed source activations were simulated using contiguous patches of active dipoles. To investigate cancellation effects in both EEG and MEG, quantitative indices were defined (source enhancement, cortical orientation disparity) and computed for varying values of the patch radius as well as for automatically parcellated gyri and sulci. Results were calculated for each cortical location, averaged over all subjects using a probabilistic atlas, and quantitatively compared between MEG and EEG. As expected, MEG sensors were found to be maximally sensitive to signals due to sources tangential to the scalp, and minimally sensitive to radial sources. Compared to EEG, however, MEG was found to be much more sensitive to signals generated antero-medially, notably in the anterior cingulate gyrus. Given that sources of activation cancel each other according to the orientation disparity of the cortex, this study provides useful methods and results for quantifying the effect of source orientation disparity upon source cancellation.

SUBMITTER: Irimia A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3254784 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Source cancellation profiles of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography.

Irimia Andrei A Van Horn John Darrell JD Halgren Eric E

NeuroImage 20110918 3

Recorded electric potentials and magnetic fields due to cortical electrical activity have spatial spread even if their underlying brain sources are focal. Consequently, as a result of source cancellation, loss in signal amplitude and reduction in the effective signal-to-noise ratio can be expected when distributed sources are active simultaneously. Here we investigate the cancellation effects of EEG and MEG through the use of an anatomically correct forward model based on structural MRI acquired ...[more]

PMID: 21959078

Similar Datasets

Project description:Both magnetoencephalography and stereo-electroencephalography are used in presurgical epilepsy assessment, with contrasting advantages and limitations. It is not known whether simultaneous stereo-electroencephalography-magnetoencephalography recording confers an advantage over both individual modalities, in particular whether magnetoencephalography can provide spatial context to epileptiform activity seen on stereo-electroencephalography. Twenty-four adult and paediatric patients who underwent stereo-electroencephalography study for pre-surgical evaluation of drug-resistant focal epilepsy, were recorded using simultaneous stereo-electroencephalography-magnetoencephalography, of which 14 had abnormal interictal activity during recording. The 14 patients were divided into two groups; those with detected superficial (n = 7) and deep (n = 7) brain interictal activity. Interictal spikes were independently identified in stereo-electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography. Magnetoencephalography dipoles were derived using a distributed inverse method. There was no significant difference between stereo-electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography in detecting superficial spikes (P = 0.135) and stereo-electroencephalography was significantly better at detecting deep spikes (P = 0.002). Mean distance across patients between stereo-electroencephalography channel with highest average spike amplitude and magnetoencephalography dipole was 20.7 ± 4.4 mm. for superficial sources, and 17.8 ± 3.7 mm. for deep sources, even though for some of the latter (n = 4) no magnetoencephalography spikes were detected and magnetoencephalography dipole was fitted to a stereo-electroencephalography interictal activity triggered average. Removal of magnetoencephalography dipole was associated with 1 year seizure freedom in 6/7 patients with superficial source, and 5/6 patients with deep source. Although stereo-electroencephalography has greater sensitivity in identifying interictal activity from deeper sources, a magnetoencephalography source can be localized using stereo-electroencephalography information, thereby providing useful whole brain context to stereo-electroencephalography and potential role in epilepsy surgery planning.

Dataset Information

Source cancellation profiles of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography.

Publications

Source cancellation profiles of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure