Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

25 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

On the statistical properties of family-based association tests in datasets containing both pedigrees and unrelated case-control samples.

ABSTRACT: A common approach to genetic mapping of loci for complex diseases is to perform a genome-wide association study (GWAS) by analyzing a vast number of SNP markers in cohorts of unrelated cases and controls. A direct motivation for the case-control design is that unrelated, affected individuals can be easier to collect than large families with multiple affected persons in the Western world. Despite its higher potential power, investigators have not actively pursued family ascertainment in part because of a dearth of methods for analyzing such correlated data on a large scale. We examine the statistical properties of several commonly used family-based association tests, as to their performance using real-life mixtures of families and singletons taken from our own migraine and schizophrenia studies, as well as population-based data for a complex trait simulated with the evolutionary phenogenetic simulator, ForSim. In virtually every situation, the full likelihood-based methods in the PSEUDOMARKER program outperformed those implemented in FBAT, GENEHUNTER TDT, PLINK (family-based options), HRR/HHRR, QTDT, TRANSMIT, UNPHASED, MENDEL, and LAMP. We further show that GWAS is much more powerful when family samples are used rather than unrelateds, on a genotype-by-genotype basis.

SUBMITTER: Hiekkalinna T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3260916 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Statistical tests and identifiability conditions for pooling and analyzing multisite datasets.

Project description:When sample sizes are small, the ability to identify weak (but scientifically interesting) associations between a set of predictors and a response may be enhanced by pooling existing datasets. However, variations in acquisition methods and the distribution of participants or observations between datasets, especially due to the distributional shifts in some predictors, may obfuscate real effects when datasets are combined. We present a rigorous statistical treatment of this problem and identify conditions where we can correct the distributional shift. We also provide an algorithm for the situation where the correction is identifiable. We analyze various properties of the framework for testing model fit, constructing confidence intervals, and evaluating consistency characteristics. Our technical development is motivated by Alzheimer's disease (AD) studies, and we present empirical results showing that our framework enables harmonizing of protein biomarkers, even when the assays across sites differ. Our contribution may, in part, mitigate a bottleneck that researchers face in clinical research when pooling smaller sized datasets and may offer benefits when the subjects of interest are difficult to recruit or when resources prohibit large single-site studies.

| S-EPMC5816202 | biostudies-literature

Family-based tests applied to extended pedigrees identify rare variants related to hypertension.

Project description:The application of family-based tests to whole-genome sequenced data provides a new window on the role of rare variant alleles in the etiology of disease. By applying family-based tests to these data, we can now identify rare variants associated with disease. Approaches for common variants, by contrast, require large sample sizes for power, and are powerless when faced with rare variants. When we tested Yip et al's 2011 family-based association tests for rare variants on pedigrees from the Genetic Analysis Workshop 18, we found that weighted collapsing methods generally have more power than unweighted methods, but are more prone to type I errors. We then evaluated a sliding window modification of the weighted family-based association tests for rare variants method. Although this modification inflates the rate of false positives, it significantly increases the power of family-based association tests for rare variants to identify causal rare variants.

| S-EPMC4143699 | biostudies-literature

Optimal strategy for linkage of datasets containing a statistical linkage key and datasets with full personal identifiers.

Project description:BackgroundLinkage of aged care and hospitalisation data provides valuable information on patterns of health service utilisation among aged care service recipients. Many aged care datasets in Australia contain a Statistical Linkage Key (SLK-581) instead of full personal identifiers. We linked hospital and death records using a full probabilistic strategy, the SLK-581, and three combined strategies; and compared results for each strategy.MethodsLinkage of Admitted Patient Data for 2000-01 to 2008-09 and Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages death registration data for 2008-09 for New South Wales, Australia, was carried out using probabilistic methods and compared to links created using four strategies incorporating a SLK-581. The Basic SLK-581 strategy used the SLK-581 alone. The Most Recent SLK-581, Most Frequent SLK-581, and Any Match SLK-581 strategies leveraged probabilistic links between hospital records drawn from the Centre for Health Record Linkage Master Linkage Key. Rates of hospitalisations among people who died were calculated for each strategy and a range of health conditions.ResultsCompared to full probabilistic linkage, the basic SLK-581 strategy produced substantial rates of missed links that increased over the study period and produced underestimates of hospitalisation rates that varied by health condition. The Most Recent SLK-581, Most Frequent SLK-581, and Any Match SLK-581 strategies resulted in substantially lower rates of underestimation than the Basic SLK-581. The Any Match SLK-581 strategy gave results closest to full probabilistic linkage.ConclusionsHospitalisation rates prior to death are substantially underestimated by linkage using a SLK-581 alone. Linkage rates can be increased by combining deterministic methods with probabilistically created links across hospital records.

| S-EPMC4236530 | biostudies-literature

Datasets on the statistical and algebraic properties of primitive Pythagorean triples.

Project description:The data in this article was obtained from the algebraic and statistical analysis of the first 331 primitive Pythagorean triples. The ordered sample is a subset of the larger Pythagorean triples. A primitive Pythagorean triple consists of three integers a, b and c such that; [Formula: see text]. A primitive Pythagorean triple is one which the greatest common divisor (gcd), that is; [Formula: see text] or a, b and c are coprime, and pairwise coprime. The dataset describe the various algebraic and statistical manipulations of the integers a, b and c that constitute the primitive Pythagorean triples. The correlation between the integers at each analysis was included. The data analysis of the non-normal nature of the integers was also included in this article. The data is open to criticism, adaptation and detailed extended analysis.

| S-EPMC5596336 | biostudies-literature

Datasets on the statistical properties of the first 3000 squared positive integers.

Project description:The data in this article are as a result of a quest to uncover alternative research routes of deepening researchers' understanding of integers apart from the traditional number theory approach. Hence, the article contains the statistical properties of the digits sum of the first 3000 squared positive integers. The data describes the various statistical tools applied to reveal different statistical and random nature of the digits sum of the first 3000 squared positive integers. Digits sum here implies the sum of all the digits that make up the individual integer.

| S-EPMC5647521 | biostudies-literature

Statistical power to detect genetic (co)variance of complex traits using SNP data in unrelated samples.

Project description:We have recently developed analysis methods (GREML) to estimate the genetic variance of a complex trait/disease and the genetic correlation between two complex traits/diseases using genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data in unrelated individuals. Here we use analytical derivations and simulations to quantify the sampling variance of the estimate of the proportion of phenotypic variance captured by all SNPs for quantitative traits and case-control studies. We also derive the approximate sampling variance of the estimate of a genetic correlation in a bivariate analysis, when two complex traits are either measured on the same or different individuals. We show that the sampling variance is inversely proportional to the number of pairwise contrasts in the analysis and to the variance in SNP-derived genetic relationships. For bivariate analysis, the sampling variance of the genetic correlation additionally depends on the harmonic mean of the proportion of variance explained by the SNPs for the two traits and the genetic correlation between the traits, and depends on the phenotypic correlation when the traits are measured on the same individuals. We provide an online tool for calculating the power of detecting genetic (co)variation using genome-wide SNP data. The new theory and online tool will be helpful to plan experimental designs to estimate the missing heritability that has not yet been fully revealed through genome-wide association studies, and to estimate the genetic overlap between complex traits (diseases) in particular when the traits (diseases) are not measured on the same samples.

| S-EPMC3983037 | biostudies-literature

Genetic association tests in family samples for multi-category phenotypes.

Project description:BackgroundAdvancements in statistical methods and sequencing technology have led to numerous novel discoveries in human genetics in the past two decades. Among phenotypes of interest, most attention has been given to studying genetic associations with continuous or binary traits. Efficient statistical methods have been proposed and are available for both types of traits under different study designs. However, for multinomial categorical traits in related samples, there is a lack of efficient statistical methods and software.ResultsWe propose an efficient score test to analyze a multinomial trait in family samples, in the context of genome-wide association/sequencing studies. An alternative Wald statistic is also proposed. We also extend the methodology to be applicable to ordinal traits. We performed extensive simulation studies to evaluate the type-I error of the score test, Wald test compared to the multinomial logistic regression for unrelated samples, under different allele frequency and study designs. We also evaluate the power of these methods. Results show that both the score and Wald tests have a well-controlled type-I error rate, but the multinomial logistic regression has an inflated type-I error rate when applied to family samples. We illustrated the application of the score test with an application to the Framingham Heart Study to uncover genetic variants associated with diabesity, a multi-category phenotype.ConclusionBoth proposed tests have correct type-I error rate and similar power. However, because the Wald statistics rely on computer-intensive estimation, it is less efficient than the score test in terms of applications to large-scale genetic association studies. We provide computer implementation for both multinomial and ordinal traits.

| S-EPMC8642939 | biostudies-literature

A unified association analysis approach for family and unrelated samples correcting for stratification.

Project description:There are two common designs for association mapping of complex diseases: case-control and family-based designs. A case-control sample is more powerful to detect genetic effects than a family-based sample that contains the same numbers of affected and unaffected persons, although additional markers may be required to control for spurious association. When family and unrelated samples are available, statistical analyses are often performed in the family and unrelated samples separately, conditioning on parental information for the former, thus resulting in reduced power. In this report, we propose a unified approach that can incorporate both family and case-control samples and, provided the additional markers are available, at the same time corrects for population stratification. We apply the principal components of a marker matrix to adjust for the effect of population stratification. This unified approach makes it unnecessary to perform a conditional analysis of the family data and is more powerful than the separate analyses of unrelated and family samples, or a meta-analysis performed by combining the results of the usual separate analyses. This property is demonstrated in both a variety of simulation models and empirical data. The proposed approach can be equally applied to the analysis of both qualitative and quantitative traits.

| S-EPMC2427300 | biostudies-literature

Power in pairs: assessing the statistical value of paired samples in tests for differential expression.

Project description:BACKGROUND:When genomics researchers design a high-throughput study to test for differential expression, some biological systems and research questions provide opportunities to use paired samples from subjects, and researchers can plan for a certain proportion of subjects to have paired samples. We consider the effect of this paired samples proportion on the statistical power of the study, using characteristics of both count (RNA-Seq) and continuous (microarray) expression data from a colorectal cancer study. RESULTS:We demonstrate that a higher proportion of subjects with paired samples yields higher statistical power, for various total numbers of samples, and for various strengths of subject-level confounding factors. In the design scenarios considered, the statistical power in a fully-paired design is substantially (and in many cases several times) greater than in an unpaired design. CONCLUSIONS:For the many biological systems and research questions where paired samples are feasible and relevant, substantial statistical power gains can be achieved at the study design stage when genomics researchers plan on using paired samples from the largest possible proportion of subjects. Any cost savings in a study design with unpaired samples are likely accompanied by underpowered and possibly biased results.

| S-EPMC6302489 | biostudies-literature

A statistical framework to guide sequencing choices in pedigrees.

Project description:The use of large pedigrees is an effective design for identifying rare functional variants affecting heritable traits. Cost-effective studies using sequence data can be achieved via pedigree-based genotype imputation in which some subjects are sequenced and missing genotypes are inferred on the remaining subjects. Because of high cost, it is important to carefully prioritize subjects for sequencing. Here, we introduce a statistical framework that enables systematic comparison among subject-selection choices for sequencing. We introduce a metric "local coverage," which allows the use of inferred inheritance vectors to measure genotype-imputation ability specifically in a region of interest, such as one with prior evidence of linkage. In the absence of linkage information, we can instead use a "genome-wide coverage" metric computed with the pedigree structure. These metrics enable the development of a method that identifies efficient selection choices for sequencing. As implemented in GIGI-Pick, this method also flexibly allows initial manual selection of subjects and optimizes selections within the constraint that only some subjects might be available for sequencing. In the present study, we used simulations to compare GIGI-Pick with PRIMUS, ExomePicks, and common ad hoc methods of selecting subjects. In genotype imputation of both common and rare alleles, GIGI-Pick substantially outperformed all other methods considered and had the added advantage of incorporating prior linkage information. We also used a real pedigree to demonstrate the utility of our approach in identifying causal mutations. Our work enables prioritization of subjects for sequencing to facilitate dissection of the genetic basis of heritable traits.

| S-EPMC3928665 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data