Dataset Information

The sub-pial resection technique for intrinsic tumor surgery.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The technique of sub-pial resection, first described in the early 1900s, was later refined by Penfield and Jasper for removal of supratentorial epileptic cortex. This technique has not been widely adopted for intrinsic tumor resection, for which the most widely used technique involves piecemeal aspiration of the tumor. This technique of "staying within the tumor" results in persistent bleeding, with obscuration of the tumor/brain interface, potentially yielding less than satisfactory results. In our experience, the sub-pial technique is useful for resections of supratentorial intrinsic tumor. We report the use of sub-pial resection technique and present illustrative cases.

Methods

The sub-pial resection technique is described along with important clinical decision-making guidelines. Representative cases are presented to discuss application of the sub-pial technique and to demonstrate surgical results.

Results

The sub-pial technique preserves the pia during cortical resections and makes it easier to protect and identify normal anatomy, including sulci, gyri, cranial nerves, and major vascular structures. This reduces bleeding, making surgery safer and more efficient. In most cases, an en bloc resection can be accomplished, permitting more accurate histopathology and more extensive tissue acquisition for research purposes.

Conclusion

The sub-pial technique can be incorporated into strategies for supratentorial intrinsic tumor resections, including temporal, frontal, occipital, and insular tumors, at para-Sylvian or para-insular-sulcus locations.

SUBMITTER: Hebb AO

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3267372 | biostudies-literature | 2011

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The sub-pial resection technique for intrinsic tumor surgery.

Hebb Adam O AO Yang Tong T Silbergeld Daniel L DL

Surgical neurology international 20111213

<h4>Background</h4>The technique of sub-pial resection, first described in the early 1900s, was later refined by Penfield and Jasper for removal of supratentorial epileptic cortex. This technique has not been widely adopted for intrinsic tumor resection, for which the most widely used technique involves piecemeal aspiration of the tumor. This technique of "staying within the tumor" results in persistent bleeding, with obscuration of the tumor/brain interface, potentially yielding less than satis ...[more]

PMID: 22368786

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAdequate margins are technically difficult to achieve for malignant tumors involving the sacroiliac joint due to limited accessibility and viewing window. In order to address the technical difficulties faced in iliosacral tumor resection, we proposed a technique for precise osteotomy, which involved the use of canulated screws and Gigli saw (CSGS) that facilitated directional control, anteroposterior linkage of resection points and adequate surgical margins. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate whether CSGS technique facilitated sagittal osteotomy at sacral side, and were adequate surgical margins achieved? Also functional and oncological outcomes was determined along with the noteworthy complications.MethodsFrom April 2018 to November 2019, we retrospectively reviewed 15 patients who underwent resections for primary tumors of pelvis or sacrum necessitating iliosacral joint removal using the proposed CSGS technique. Chondrosarcoma was the most common diagnosis. The osteotomy site within sacrum was at ipsilateral ventral sacral foramina in 8 cases, midline of sacrum in 5 cases, and contralateral ventral sacral foramina and sacral ala with 1 case each. The average intraoperative blood loss was 3640 mL (range, 1200 and 6000 mL) with a mean operation duration of 7.4 hours (range, 5 to 12 hours). The mean follow-up was 23.0 months (range, 18 and 39 months) for alive patients.ResultsSurgical margins were wide in 12 patients (80%), wide-contaminated in 1 patient (6.7%), and marginal in 2 patients (13.3%). R0 resection was achieved in 12 (80%) patients and R1 resection in 3 patients. There were three local recurrences (20%) occurred at a mean time of 11 months postoperatively. No local recurrence was observed at sacral osteotomy. The overall one-year and three-year survival rate was 86.7% and 72.7% respectively.Complications occurred in three patients.ConclusionsThe current study demonstrated that CSGS technique for tumor resection within the sacrum and pelvis was feasible and can achieve ideal resection accuracies. The use of CSGS was associated with high likelihood of negative margin resections in the current series. Intraoperative use of CSGS appeared to be technically straightforward and allowed achievement of planned surgical margins. It is worthwhile to consider the use of CSGS technique in resection of pelvic tumors with sacral invasion and iliosacral tumors, however further follow-up at mid to long-term is warranted to observe local recurrence rate.

Dataset Information

The sub-pial resection technique for intrinsic tumor surgery.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

The sub-pial resection technique for intrinsic tumor surgery.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure