Dataset Information

Autologous mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: an open-label phase 2a proof-of-concept study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

More than half of patients with multiple sclerosis have progressive disease characterised by accumulating disability. The absence of treatments for progressive multiple sclerosis represents a major unmet clinical need. On the basis of evidence that mesenchymal stem cells have a beneficial effect in acute and chronic animal models of multiple sclerosis, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of these cells as a potential neuroprotective treatment for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

Methods

Patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis involving the visual pathways (expanded disability status score 5·5-6·5) were recruited from the East Anglia and north London regions of the UK. Participants received intravenous infusion of autologous bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in this open-label study. Our primary objective was to assess feasibility and safety; we compared adverse events from up to 20 months before treatment until up to 10 months after the infusion. As a secondary objective, we chose efficacy outcomes to assess the anterior visual pathway as a model of wider disease. Masked endpoint analyses was used for electrophysiological and selected imaging outcomes. We used piecewise linear mixed models to assess the change in gradients over time at the point of intervention. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00395200.

Findings

We isolated, expanded, characterised, and administered mesenchymal stem cells in ten patients. The mean dose was 1·6×10(6) cells per kg bodyweight (range 1·1-2·0). One patient developed a transient rash shortly after treatment; two patients had self-limiting bacterial infections 3-4 weeks after treatment. We did not identify any serious adverse events. We noted improvement after treatment in visual acuity (difference in monthly rates of change -0·02 logMAR units, 95% CI -0·03 to -0·01; p=0·003) and visual evoked response latency (-1·33 ms, -2·44 to -0·21; p=0·020), with an increase in optic nerve area (difference in monthly rates of change 0·13 mm(2), 0·04 to 0·22; p=0·006). We did not identify any significant effects on colour vision, visual fields, macular volume, retinal nerve fibre layer thickness, or optic nerve magnetisation transfer ratio.

Interpretation

Autologous mesenchymal stem cells were safely given to patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis in our study. The evidence of structural, functional, and physiological improvement after treatment in some visual endpoints is suggestive of neuroprotection.

Funding

Medical Research Council, Multiple Sclerosis Society of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Evelyn Trust, NHS National Institute for Health Research, Cambridge and UCLH Biomedical Research Centres, Wellcome Trust, Raymond and Beverly Sackler Foundation, and Sir David and Isobel Walker Trust.

SUBMITTER: Connick P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3279697 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:The underlying pathophysiology in intellectual disability (ID) involves abnormalities in dendritic branching and connectivity of the neuronal network. This limits the ability of the brain to process information. Conceptually, cellular therapy through its neurorestorative and neuroregenerative properties can counteract these pathogenetic mechanisms and improve neuronal connectivity. This improved networking should exhibit as clinical efficacy in patients with ID. METHODS:To assess the safety and efficacy of cellular therapy in patients with ID, we conducted an open-label proof-of-concept study from October 2011 to December 2015. Patients were divided into two groups: intervention group (n?=?29) and rehabilitation group (n?=?29). The intervention group underwent cellular transplantation consisting of intrathecal administration of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells and standard neurorehabilitation. The rehabilitation group underwent only standard neurorehabilitation. The results of the symptomatic outcomes were compared between the two groups. In the intervention group analysis, the outcome measures used were the intelligence quotient (IQ) and the Wee Functional Independence Measure (Wee-FIM). To compare the pre-intervention and post-intervention results, statistical analysis was done using Wilcoxon's matched-pairs test for Wee-FIM scores and McNemar's test for symptomatic improvements and IQ. The effect of age and severity of the disorder were assessed for their impact on the outcome of intervention. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) brain scan was used as a monitoring tool to study effects of the intervention. Adverse events were monitored for the safety of cellular therapy. RESULTS:On symptomatic analysis, greater improvements were seen in the intervention group as compared to the rehabilitation group. In the intervention group, the symptomatic improvements, IQ and Wee-FIM were statistically significant. A significantly better outcome of the intervention was found in the paediatric age group (<18 years) and patients with milder severity of ID. Repeat PET-CT scan in three patients of the intervention group showed improved metabolism in the frontal, parietal cortex, thalamus, mesial temporal structures and cerebellum. No major adverse events were witnessed. CONCLUSIONS:Cellular transplantation with neurorehabilitation is safe and effective for the treatment of underlying brain deficits in ID. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02245724. Registered 12 September 2014.

Project description:BackgroundWorldwide, although predominantly in low-income countries in the Middle East and Africa, up to 13% of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are caused by HCV genotype 4. For patients with HCV genotype 1, the combination of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir has been shown to cure high proportions of patients with excellent tolerability, but this regimen has not been assessed for the treatment of HCV genotype 4. We assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 12 weeks of combination therapy with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for patients with chronic HCV genotype 4 infections.MethodsIn this single-centre, open-label cohort, phase 2a trial, patients with HCV genotype 4 who were treatment naive or interferon treatment experienced (HIV-negative) were sequentially enrolled at the Clinical Center of the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. We gave patients 12 weeks of ledipasvir (90 mg) and sofosbuvir (400 mg) as a single combination tablet once per day. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained viral response at 12 weeks (SVR12), as measured by the proportion of patients with HCV RNA concentrations less than the lower limit of quantification (COBAS TaqMan HCV test, version 1.0, 43 IU/mL). The primary safety endpoint was the frequency and severity of adverse events. We did our analyses on an intention-to-treat basis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01805882.FindingsBetween Sept 16, 2013, and Nov 2, 2014, we recruited 21 patients. 20 (95%) of 21 patients completed 12 weeks of treatment and achieved SVR12 (95% CI 76-100), including seven patients with cirrhosis. One patient was non-adherent to study drugs and withdrew from the study, but was included in the intention-to-treat analysis. No patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events and no grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred that were related to study medications. The most common adverse events were diarrhoea (two patients), fatigue (three patients), nausea (two patients), and upper respiratory infections (two patients).InterpretationLedipasvir and sofosbuvir treatment for 12 weeks was well tolerated by patients with HCV genotype 4 and resulted in 100% SVR for all patients who received all 12 weeks of study drugs, irrespective of previous treatment status and underlying liver fibrosis. This is the first report of a single-pill, all-oral, interferon-free, ribavirin-free treatment for patients with HCV genotype 4.FundingNIAID, National Cancer Institute and Clinical Center Intramural Program. The study was also supported in part by a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement between NIH and Gilead Sciences.

Project description:Background: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic autoimmune disease. We tested the safety of a single intravenous injection of intrafamilial allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSC) to treat severe SSc. Methods: We conducted the first prospective, monocentric, dose-escalation, phase I/II clinical trial investigating the feasibility and safety of a single allogeneic BM-MSC infusion in 20 severe SSc patients who were refractory or had a contraindication to conventional immunosuppressive therapy or autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Patients were assigned to an infusion of either 1x10^6 BM-MSC/kg or 3x10^6 BM-MSC/kg obtained from 20 independent intrafamilial donors. Primary endpoint was the rate of grade ≥ 3 Severe Adverse Events (SAE; NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v5.0)) in the first 10 days post-BM-MSC infusion. Secondary endpoints included adequacy of BM-MSC production, medium-term SAE, as well as clinical and immunological response. Findings: No Grade 3 ≥ SAE occurred in the first 10 days following MSC infusion in the 20 SSc patients. A significant improvement in modified Rodnan Skin Score (p<0.0001) was observed after BM-MSC infusion, which peaked at 3 months and was sustained for 1 year. No changes in health-related quality of life or pulmonary function were observed. CD8pos T-Cell and NK cell counts slightly increased after infusion (p<0.05) and two patients developed de novo donor-specific anti-HLA. Circulating TGF-β level at baseline was significantly higher in non-responder compared to responder patients (p<0.05). A pattern of low IDO activity, CCL2 production, and HLA-DR expression in BM-MSC batches under in vitro stimulation by IFN-beta was associated with a lack of clinical response in recipient SSc patients. Interpretation: A single infusion of allogeneic BM-MSC transplant was safe in severe SSc patients and triggered short-term disease modifying effects. Clinical response was associated with both the recipients biological features and the functional properties of infused BM-MSC.

Project description:SummaryBackgroundGout flares are driven by interleukin (IL)-1β. Dapansutrile inhibits the NLRP3 inflammasome and subsequent activation of IL-1β. In this study we aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of orally administered dapansutrile in patients with a gout flare.MethodsIn this open-label, proof-of-concept, phase 2a trial, adult patients (aged 18-80 years) with a monoarticular monosodium urate crystal-proven gout flare were enrolled at an outpatient clinic in the Netherlands and sequentially assigned using a dose-adaptive design to receive 100 mg/day, 300 mg/day, 1000 mg/day, or 2000 mg/day oral dapansutrile for 8 days. The coprimary outcomes were change in patient-reported target joint pain from baseline to day 3 and from baseline to day 7, assessed in the per-protocol population (all patients who received at least 80% of the study drug and had no major protocol deviations). Safety was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT 2016-000943-14, and is completed.FindingsBetween May 18, 2017, and Jan 21, 2019, 144 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 34 were enrolled and 29 were included in the per-protocol population (three patients were excluded due to receiving <80% of study drug and two had major protocol deviations): eight patients received 100 mg/day, seven received 300 mg/day, six received 1000 mg/day, and eight received 2000 mg/day. Between baseline and day 3, there was a mean reduction in patient-reported target joint pain of 52·4% (SD 32·94; p=0∙016) for the 100 mg/day group, 68·4% (34·29; p=0∙016) for the 300 mg/day group, 55·8% (44·90; p=0∙063) for the 1000 mg/day group, and 57·6% (38·72; p=0∙016) for the 2000 mg/day group. At day 7, there was a mean reduction of 82·1% (22·68; p=0∙031) for the 100 mg/day group, 84·2% (16·33; p=0∙016) for the 300 mg/day group, 68·9% (34·89; p=0∙031) for the 1000 mg/day group, and 83·9% (15·44; p=0∙008) for the 2000 mg/day group, compared to baseline. 25 (73·5%) of 34 patients reported a total of 45 treatment-emergent adverse events, most of which were metabolism and nutrition disorders (17 [37·8%]) and gastrointestinal disorders (ten [22·2%]). Two serious adverse events occurred during the study, admission to hospital because of worsening of gout flare at day 3, and admission to hospital because of coronary stenosis 18 days after the patient received their last dose; these were considered moderate in severity and unrelated to the study drug.InterpretationDapansutrile is a specific NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor with a satisfactory safety profile and efficacy in the reduction of target joint pain in this study. Future studies are needed to confirm the clinical potential of dapansutrile.