Dataset Information

Biofuels: network analysis of the literature reveals key environmental and economic unknowns.

ABSTRACT: Despite rapid growth in biofuel production worldwide, it is uncertain whether decision-makers possess sufficient information to fully evaluate the impacts of the industry and avoid unintended consequences. Doing so requires rigorous peer-reviewed data and analyses across the entire range of direct and indirect effects. To assess the coverage of scientific research, we analyzed over 1600 peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2009 that addressed 23 biofuels-related topics within four thematic areas: environment and human well-being, economics, technology, and geography. Greenhouse gases, fuel production, and feedstock production were well-represented in the literature, while trade, biodiversity, and human health were not. Gaps were especially striking across topics in the Southern Hemisphere, where the greatest potential socio-economic benefits, as well as environmental damages, may co-occur. There was strong asymmetry in the connectedness of research topics; greenhouse gases articles were twice as often connected to other topics as biodiversity articles. This could undermine the ability of scientific and economic analyses to adequately evaluate impacts and avoid significant unintended consequences. At the least, our review suggests caution in this developing industry and the need to pursue more interdisciplinary research to assess complex trade-offs and feedbacks inherent to an industry with wide-reaching potential impacts.

SUBMITTER: Ridley CE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3280622 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Biofuels: network analysis of the literature reveals key environmental and economic unknowns.

Ridley Caroline E CE Clark Christopher M CM Leduc Stephen D SD Bierwagen Britta G BG Lin Brenda B BB Mehl Adrea A Tobias David A DA

Environmental science & technology 20120109 3

Despite rapid growth in biofuel production worldwide, it is uncertain whether decision-makers possess sufficient information to fully evaluate the impacts of the industry and avoid unintended consequences. Doing so requires rigorous peer-reviewed data and analyses across the entire range of direct and indirect effects. To assess the coverage of scientific research, we analyzed over 1600 peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2009 that addressed 23 biofuels-related topics within four t ...[more]

PMID: 22229835

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundTumor invasiveness reflects numerous biological changes, including tumorigenesis, progression, and metastasis. To decipher the role of transcriptional regulators (TR) involved in tumor invasiveness, we performed a systematic network-based pan-cancer assessment of master regulators of cancer invasiveness.Materials and methodsWe stratified patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) into invasiveness high (INV-H) and low (INV-L) groups using consensus clustering based on an established robust 24-gene signature to determine the prognostic association of invasiveness with overall survival (OS) across 32 different cancers. We devise a network-based protocol to identify TRs as master regulators (MRs) unique to INV-H and INV-L phenotypes. We validated the activity of MRs coherently associated with INV-H phenotype and worse OS across cancers in TCGA on a series of additional datasets in the Prediction of Clinical Outcomes from the Genomic Profiles (PRECOG) repository.ResultsBased on the 24-gene signature, we defined the invasiveness score for each patient sample and stratified patients into INV-H and INV-L clusters. We observed that invasiveness was associated with worse survival outcomes in almost all cancers and had a significant association with OS in ten out of 32 cancers. Our network-based framework identified common invasiveness-associated MRs specific to INV-H and INV-L groups across the ten prognostic cancers, including COL1A1, which is also part of the 24-gene signature, thus acting as a positive control. Downstream pathway analysis of MRs specific to INV-H phenotype resulted in the identification of several enriched pathways, including Epithelial into Mesenchymal Transition, TGF-β signaling pathway, regulation of Toll-like receptors, cytokines, and inflammatory response, and selective expression of chemokine receptors during T-cell polarization. Most of these pathways have connotations of inflammatory immune response and feasibility for metastasis.ConclusionOur pan-cancer study provides a comprehensive master regulator analysis of tumor invasiveness and can suggest more precise therapeutic strategies by targeting the identified MRs and downstream enriched pathways for patients across multiple cancers.

Project description:BackgroundScientific discovery progresses by exploring new and uncharted territory. More specifically, it advances by a process of transforming unknown unknowns first into known unknowns, and then into knowns. Over the last few decades, researchers have developed many knowledge bases to capture and connect the knowns, which has enabled topic exploration and contextualization of experimental results. But recognizing the unknowns is also critical for finding the most pertinent questions and their answers. Prior work on known unknowns has sought to understand them, annotate them, and automate their identification. However, no knowledge-bases yet exist to capture these unknowns, and little work has focused on how scientists might use them to trace a given topic or experimental result in search of open questions and new avenues for exploration. We show here that a knowledge base of unknowns can be connected to ontologically grounded biomedical knowledge to accelerate research in the field of prenatal nutrition.ResultsWe present the first ignorance-base, a knowledge-base created by combining classifiers to recognize ignorance statements (statements of missing or incomplete knowledge that imply a goal for knowledge) and biomedical concepts over the prenatal nutrition literature. This knowledge-base places biomedical concepts mentioned in the literature in context with the ignorance statements authors have made about them. Using our system, researchers interested in the topic of vitamin D and prenatal health were able to uncover three new avenues for exploration (immune system, respiratory system, and brain development) by searching for concepts enriched in ignorance statements. These were buried among the many standard enriched concepts. Additionally, we used the ignorance-base to enrich concepts connected to a gene list associated with vitamin D and spontaneous preterm birth and found an emerging topic of study (brain development) in an implied field (neuroscience). The researchers could look to the field of neuroscience for potential answers to the ignorance statements.ConclusionOur goal is to help students, researchers, funders, and publishers better understand the state of our collective scientific ignorance (known unknowns) in order to help accelerate research through the continued illumination of and focus on the known unknowns and their respective goals for scientific knowledge.

Project description:BackgroundScientists have been trying to understand the molecular mechanisms of diseases to design preventive and therapeutic strategies for a long time. For some diseases, it has become evident that it is not enough to obtain a catalogue of the disease-related genes but to uncover how disruptions of molecular networks in the cell give rise to disease phenotypes. Moreover, with the unprecedented wealth of information available, even obtaining such catalogue is extremely difficult.Principal findingsWe developed a comprehensive gene-disease association database by integrating associations from several sources that cover different biomedical aspects of diseases. In particular, we focus on the current knowledge of human genetic diseases including mendelian, complex and environmental diseases. To assess the concept of modularity of human diseases, we performed a systematic study of the emergent properties of human gene-disease networks by means of network topology and functional annotation analysis. The results indicate a highly shared genetic origin of human diseases and show that for most diseases, including mendelian, complex and environmental diseases, functional modules exist. Moreover, a core set of biological pathways is found to be associated with most human diseases. We obtained similar results when studying clusters of diseases, suggesting that related diseases might arise due to dysfunction of common biological processes in the cell.ConclusionsFor the first time, we include mendelian, complex and environmental diseases in an integrated gene-disease association database and show that the concept of modularity applies for all of them. We furthermore provide a functional analysis of disease-related modules providing important new biological insights, which might not be discovered when considering each of the gene-disease association repositories independently. Hence, we present a suitable framework for the study of how genetic and environmental factors, such as drugs, contribute to diseases.AvailabilityThe gene-disease networks used in this study and part of the analysis are available at http://ibi.imim.es/DisGeNET/DisGeNETweb.html#Download.

Dataset Information

Biofuels: network analysis of the literature reveals key environmental and economic unknowns.

Publications

Biofuels: network analysis of the literature reveals key environmental and economic unknowns.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets