Dataset Information

Neurogenic changes in the upper airway of patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

ABSTRACT:

Rationale

Controversy persists regarding the presence and importance of hypoglossal nerve dysfunction in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

Objectives

We assessed quantitative parameters related to motor unit potential (MUP) morphology derived from electromyographic (EMG) signals in patients with OSA versus control subjects and hypothesized that signs of neurogenic remodeling would be present in the patients with OSA.

Methods

Participants underwent diagnostic sleep studies to obtain apnea-hypopnea indices. Muscle activity was detected with 50-mm concentric needle electrodes. The concentric needle was positioned at more than 10 independent sites per subject, after the local anatomy of the upper airway musculature was examined by ultrasonography. All activity was quantified with subjects awake, during supine eupneic breathing while wearing a nasal mask connected to a pneumotachograph. Genioglossus EMG signals were analyzed offline by automated software (DQEMG), which extracted motor unit potential trains (MUPTs) contributed by individual motor units from the composite EMG signals. Quantitative measurements of MUP templates, including duration, peak-to-peak amplitude, area, area-to-amplitude ratio, and size index, were compared between the untreated patients with OSA and healthy control subjects.

Measurements and main results

A total of 1,655 MUPTs from patients with OSA (n = 17; AHI, 55 ± 6/h) and control subjects (n = 14; AHI, 4 ± 1/h) were extracted from the genioglossus muscle EMG signals. MUP peak-to-peak amplitudes in the patients with OSA were not different compared with the control subjects (397.5 ± 9.0 vs. 382.5 ± 10.0 μV). However, the MUPs of the patients with OSA were longer in duration (11.5 ± 0.1 vs. 10.3 ± 0.1 ms; P < 0.001) and had a larger size index (4.09 ± 0.02 vs. 3.92 ± 0.02; P < 0.001) compared with control subjects.

Conclusions

These results confirm and quantify the extent and existence of structural neural remodeling in OSA.

SUBMITTER: Saboisky JP

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3297112 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Study objectivesUpper airway stimulation (UAS) is an alternative treatment for obstructive sleep apnea that must be activated nightly. Although the implanted device offsets the mask- or pressure-related side effects often associated with continuous positive airway pressure therapy, some UAS recipients do not use the therapy consistently. This study qualitatively explored factors associated with UAS usage in obstructive sleep apnea patients.MethodsSemistructured interviews were conducted with 24 obstructive sleep apnea patients who received UAS treatment. Twelve patients were categorized as high users with mean usage of ≥ 4 hours/night and 12 were categorized as low users with < 4 hours/night or nonuse. Interviews explored patients' experiences regarding barriers and facilitators to UAS use and their advice for new UAS recipients. Demographic and clinical data including the Insomnia Severity Index and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale were collected.ResultsCompared to high users, low users had higher levels of insomnia (mean Insomnia Severity Index: 3.6 vs 15.2, respectively) and anxiety (mean Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale: 3.4 vs 6.9). High users reported more positive experiences with UAS treatment, such as improvements in symptoms and convenience of treatment, as facilitators of use. Low users tended to focus on the negative aspects of treatment, particularly stimulation-related discomfort and associated sleep disturbance.ConclusionsInsomnia with or without anxiety contributes to differing patient-reported experiences in high vs low user groups, with increased insomnia symptoms among low users. Improved understanding of the specific barrier and facilitators of UAS adherence may drive better long-term use and more personalized management strategies, including concomitant insomnia treatment.Clinical trials registrationRegistry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Stimulation Therapy for Apnea: Reporting Thoughts (START); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04768543; Identifier: NCT04768543.CitationLuyster FS, Ni Q, Lee K, et al. Factors affecting obstructive sleep apnea patients' use of upper airway stimulation treatment. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(9):2207-2215.

Project description:Importance:Adenotonsillar hypertrophy is an important cause of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children. However, residual OSA and abnormal polysomnographic findings have been reported in up to 75% of cases after adenotonsillectomy. Other anatomical and functional factors that influence upper airway structures, including the lateral pharyngeal wall, have rarely been studied in children with OSA. Objective:To determine whether the upper airway structures can be evaluated using head and neck ultrasonography and if there is an association between the ultrasonographic measurements for these structures and severity of OSA seen on polysomnography in children. Design, Setting, and Participants:Prospective, single-center, observational study of 82 children younger than 18 years with a diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing (20 with primary snoring, 62 with OSA, as determined by the apnea-hypopnea index) and admitted to a tertiary teaching hospital for adenotonsillectomy. Exposures:Ultrasonography and polysomnography. Main Outcomes and Measures:Ultrasonographic measurements of upper airway structures. Results:Of the 82 children studied, 62 (76%) were boys; mean (SD) age, 7.7 (6.2). There was no significant difference found in tonsillar dimensions or volume between the children with OSA and those with primary snoring. However, the mean (SD) total lateral pharyngeal wall and the total neck thicknesses at the retropalatal level were both greater in children with OSA than in those with primary snoring at rest (24.9 [4.4] mm vs 21.3 [2.6] mm; difference, 3.61 mm; 95% CI of difference, 1.48-5.74 mm for lateral pharyngeal wall; and 59.9 [14.4] mm vs 49.9 [11.2] mm; difference, 10.9 mm, 95% CI of difference, 3.8-17.9 mm for the total neck). Conclusions and Relevance:Estimated tonsillar volume measured using ultrasonography had no relationship with the apnea-hypopnea index in childhood sleep-disordered breathing. However, the lateral pharyngeal wall was significantly thicker in children with OSA than in those with primary snoring at rest.