Dataset Information

Likelihood of starting dialysis after incident fistula creation.

ABSTRACT: Guidelines promote early fistula creation to avoid central venous catheter use. This practice may lead to fistula creations in patients who never receive dialysis. The objective of this study was to estimate the risk of fistula nonuse with long-term follow-up.Administrative health data identified 1929 predialysis adults who had their first fistula creation between April of 2002 and March of 2006. Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years or until they began dialysis, received a kidney transplant, or died.The median follow-up times in patients who started dialysis, died without receiving dialysis, and remained in predialysis were 6.1, 11.5, and 38.7 months, respectively. Eighty-one percent of patients initiated dialysis; 9% of patients died without receiving dialysis, and 10% of patients remained predialysis. Forty percent of patients had their first fistula creation 3-12 months before initiating dialysis (the recommended window). Thirty percent were created within 90 days of starting dialysis; 30% were created more than 1 year before starting dialysis, and 10% were created more than 2 years before starting dialysis. Older patients, females, and patients with less comorbidity were not as likely to initiate dialysis after incident fistula creation.Most patients who underwent fistula creation before starting dialysis eventually received dialysis with extended follow-up, but the risk was significantly modified by age, sex, and comorbidity. Many patients had fistula creations earlier or later than recommended.

SUBMITTER: Oliver MJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3302676 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Likelihood of starting dialysis after incident fistula creation.

Oliver Matthew J MJ Quinn Robert R RR Garg Amit X AX Kim S Joseph SJ Wald Ron R Paterson J Michael JM

Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN 20120216 3

<h4>Background and objectives</h4>Guidelines promote early fistula creation to avoid central venous catheter use. This practice may lead to fistula creations in patients who never receive dialysis. The objective of this study was to estimate the risk of fistula nonuse with long-term follow-up.<h4>Design, setting, participants, & measurements</h4>Administrative health data identified 1929 predialysis adults who had their first fistula creation between April of 2002 and March of 2006. Patients wer ...[more]

PMID: 22344512

Similar Datasets

Project description:Rationale & objectiveComparisons of outcomes between in-center hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) are confounded by selection bias because PD patients are typically younger and healthier and may have received longer predialysis care. We compared first-year survival between what we hypothesized were clinically equivalent groups; namely, patients who initiate maintenance HD using an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and those selecting PD as their initial modality.Study designObservational, registry-based, retrospective cohort study.Setting & participantsUS Renal Data System data for 5 annual cohorts (2010-2014; n = 130,324) of incident HD with an AVF and incident PD patients.Exposures and predictorsExposure was more than 1 day receiving PD or more than 1 day receiving HD with an AVF. Time at risk for both cohorts was determined for 12 consecutive 30-day segments, censoring for transplantation, loss to follow-up, or end of time. Predictors included patient-level characteristics obtained from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 2728 Form and other data sources.OutcomesPatient survival.Analytical approachUnadjusted and multivariable risk-adjusted HRs for death of HD versus PD patients, averaged over 2010 to 2014, were calculated.ResultsThe HD cohort's average unadjusted mortality rate was consistently higher than for the PD cohort. The HR of HD versus PD was 1.25 (95% CI, 1.20-1.30) in the unadjusted model and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.80-0.87) in the adjusted model. However, multivariable risk-adjusted analyses showed the HR of HD versus PD for the first 90 days was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.98-1.14), decreasing to 0.74 (95% CI, 0.68-0.80) in the 270- to 360-day period.LimitationsResidual confounding due to selection bias inherent in dialysis modality choice and the observational study design. Form 2728 provides baseline data at dialysis incidence alone, but not over time.ConclusionsUS patients receiving HD with an AVF appear to have a survival advantage over PD patients after 90 days of dialysis initiation after accounting for patient characteristics. These findings have implications in the choice of initial dialysis modality and vascular access for patients.

Project description:BackgroundIn North America, most people start hemodialysis via a central venous catheter ("catheter"). These patients are counseled to undergo arteriovenous fistula ("fistula") creation within weeks of starting hemodialysis because fistulas are associated with improved survival.ObjectivesTo determine whether attempting to create a fistula in patients who start hemodialysis via a catheter is associated with improved mortality. We also sought to determine whether differences in baseline patient characteristics, vascular procedures for access-related complications, or days in hospital may confound or mediate the relationship between attempted fistula creation and mortality.DesignMulticenter, retrospective cohort study.SettingSix dialysis programs located in Ontario, Alberta, and Manitoba.PatientsPatients aged ≥18 years who initiated hemodialysis via a catheter between January 1, 2004, and May 31, 2012, who had not had a previous attempt at fistula creation. We excluded those who had a life expectancy less than 1 year, who transitioned to peritoneal dialysis within 6 months of starting dialysis, and people who started hemodialysis via a graft.MeasurementsAttempted fistula creation, all-cause mortality, patient characteristics and comorbidities, vascular procedures for access-related complications, and days spent in hospital.MethodsWe used survival methods, including marginal structural models, to account for immortal time bias and time-varying confounding.ResultsIn total, 1832 patients initiated hemodialysis via a catheter during the study period and met inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 565 (31%) underwent an attempt at fistula creation following hemodialysis start. As compared to those who did not receive a fistula attempt, these people were younger, had fewer comorbidities, and were more likely to have started dialysis as an outpatient and to have received pre-dialysis care. In a marginal structural model controlling for baseline characteristics and comorbidities, attempted fistula creation was associated with a significantly lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.43-0.66). This effect did not appear to be confounded or mediated by differences in the number of days spent in hospital or vascular procedures for access-related complications. It also remained similar in analyses restricted to patients who survived at least 6 months (HR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.47-0.77) and to patients who started hemodialysis as an outpatient (HR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.33-0.68).LimitationsThere is likely residual confounding and treatment selection bias.ConclusionsIn this multicenter cohort study, attempting fistula creation in people who started hemodialysis via a catheter was associated with significantly reduced mortality. This reduction in mortality could not be explained by differences in patient characteristics or comorbidities, days spent in hospital, or vascular procedures for access-related complications. Residual confounding or selection bias may explain the observed benefits of fistulas for hemodialysis access.Trial registrationNot applicable (cohort study).

Project description:Current guidelines suggest that arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is associated with survival advantage over arteriovenous graft (AVG). However, AVFs often require months to become functional, increasing tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC) use, which can erode the benefit of an AVF. We sought to compare survival in patients with end-stage renal disease after creation of an AVF or AVG in patients starting hemodialysis (HD) with a TDC and to identify patient populations that may benefit from preferential use of AVG over AVF.Using U.S. Renal Data System databases, we identified incident HD patients in 2005 through 2008 and observed them through 2008. Initial access type and clinical variables including albumin levels were assessed using U.S. Renal Data System data collection forms. Attempts at AVF and AVG creation in patients who started HD through a TDC were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. We accounted for the effect of changes in access type by truncating follow-up when an additional AVF or AVG was performed. Survival curves were then constructed, and log-rank tests were used for pairwise survival comparisons, stratified by age. Multivariate analysis was performed with Cox proportional hazards regressions; variables were chosen using stepwise elimination. An interaction of access type and albumin level was detected, and Cox models using differing thresholds for albumin level were constructed. The primary outcome was survival.Among the 138,245 patients who started with a TDC and had complete records amenable for analysis, 22.8% underwent AVF creation (mean age ± standard deviation, 68.9 ± 12.5 years; 27.8% mortality at 1 year) and 7.6% underwent AVG placement (70.2 ± 12.0 years; 28.2% mortality) within 3 months of HD initiation; 69.6% remained with a TDC (63.2 ± 15.4 years; 33.8% mortality). In adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression, AVF creation is equivalent to AVG placement in terms of survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-1.02; P = .349). AVG placement is superior to continued TDC use (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.48-1.61; P < .001). In patients older than 80 years with albumin levels >4.0 g/dL, AVF creation is associated with higher mortality hazard compared with AVG creation (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.04-1.43; P = .013).For patients who start HD through a TDC, placement of an AVF and AVG is associated with similar mortality hazard. Further study is necessary to determine the ideal access for patients in whom the survival advantage of an AVF over an AVG is uncertain.

Project description:An endovascular arteriovenous fistula is a recent technological advancement in hemodialysis vascular access. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of endovascular arteriovenous fistula (eAVF) creation compared with surgical arteriovenous fistula (sAVF) creation among patients with chronic kidney disease. We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Clinical Trials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform until May 2021 to perform meta-analyses using random-effects models. Pre-specified primary outcomes were fistula maturation, procedure-related complications, and patient satisfaction. Secondary outcomes were procedural technical success, procedure time, all adverse events, and medical expenditure. The risk of bias in non-randomized studies of the interventions assessment tool, and the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach were used to assess the quality of individual studies and the body of evidence, respectively. In seven studies including 860 patients, endovascular arteriovenous fistula creation had little to no effect on fistula maturation (odds ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence intervals, 0.05 to 6.91). Meta-analysis could not be performed for procedure-related complications and patient satisfaction due to insufficient data. For secondary outcomes, endovascular arteriovenous fistula resulted in a slight to no difference in procedural technical success (odds ratio, 0.69: 95% confidence intervals, 0.04 to 11.98) and all adverse events (odds ratio, 6.31; 95% confidence intervals, 0.64 to 62.22). Endovascular fistula creation incurred less medical expenditure than sAVF (mean difference, USD 12760; 95% confidence intervals, -19710 to -5820). Meta-analysis for procedure time was not performed because one of the studies had a critical risk of bias. All of these outcomes were of low certainty of evidence or very low certainty of evidence. There was limited evidence for supporting endovascular arteriovenous fistula creation over conventional surgical arteriovenous fistula creation for patients with chronic kidney disease. Multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of eAVFs in selected populations.

Dataset Information

Likelihood of starting dialysis after incident fistula creation.

Publications

Likelihood of starting dialysis after incident fistula creation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets