Dataset Information

Insulin glargine: a reevaluation of rodent carcinogenicity findings.

ABSTRACT: The 1995 to 1997 lifetime carcinogenicity studies of insulin glargine in rats and mice were reanalyzed and reassessed for their validity according to current guidelines. In 2-year studies, 50 animals per sex and per group were used. Survival rates between weeks 80 and 90 in female mice and rats were greater than 20 animals in all groups, fulfilling current Food and Drug Administration requirements that enough animals lived long enough to provide adequate exposure to glargine and to be at risk of forming late-developing tumors. Exposure to 5 or 12.5 IU/kg glargine was similar to or 2 to 3 times greater than 5 IU/kg neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin, respectively. Using statistical methods recommended by current guidelines, no significant effect of glargine on mammary gland neoplastic lesions in female rodents was found, confirming earlier results. Thus, both studies can be considered valid according to contemporary standards. Insulin glargine does not present a carcinogenic risk.

SUBMITTER: Stammberger I

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3325594 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Insulin glargine: a reevaluation of rodent carcinogenicity findings.

Stammberger Ingo I Essermeant Luc L

International journal of toxicology 20120103 2

The 1995 to 1997 lifetime carcinogenicity studies of insulin glargine in rats and mice were reanalyzed and reassessed for their validity according to current guidelines. In 2-year studies, 50 animals per sex and per group were used. Survival rates between weeks 80 and 90 in female mice and rats were greater than 20 animals in all groups, fulfilling current Food and Drug Administration requirements that enough animals lived long enough to provide adequate exposure to glargine and to be at risk of ...[more]

PMID: 22215409

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundChronically elevated blood glucose levels are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Many diabetes patients will eventually require insulin treatment to maintain good glycaemic control. There are still uncertainties about the optimal insulin treatment regimens for type 2 diabetes, but the long-acting insulin analogues seem beneficial. Several reviews have compared either insulin detemir or insulin glargine to NPH insulin, but research directly comparing both insulin analogues is limited.ObjectivesTo assess the effects of insulin detemir and insulin glargine compared with each other in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.Search strategyWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, online registries of ongoing trials and abstract books. Date of last search was January 2011.Selection criteriaAll randomised controlled trials comparing insulin detemir with insulin glargine with a duration of 12 weeks or longer were included.Data collection and analysisTwo authors independently selected the studies and extracted the data. Pooling of studies by means of random-effects meta-analysis was performed.Main resultsThis review examined four trials lasting 24 to 52 weeks involving 2250 people randomised to either insulin detemir or glargine. Overall, risk of bias of the evaluated studies was high. Insulin glargine was dosed once-daily in the evening. Insulin detemir was initiated once-daily in the evening with the option of an additional dose in the morning in three studies and initiated twice-daily in one study. Of randomised patients 13.6% to 57.2% were injecting insulin detemir twice-daily at the end of trial.Glycaemic control, measured by glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and HbA1c equal to or less than 7% with or without hypoglycaemia, did not differ statistically significantly between treatment groups.The results showed no significant differences in overall, nocturnal and severe hypoglycaemia between treatment groups.Insulin detemir was associated with less weight gain. Treatment with insulin glargine resulted in a lower daily basal insulin dose and a lower number of injection site reactions.There was no significant difference in the variability of FPG or glucose values in 24-hour profiles between treatment groups. It was not possible to draw conclusions on quality of life, costs or mortality. Only one trial reported results on health-related quality of life and showed no significant differences between treatment groups.Authors' conclusionsOur analyses suggest that there is no clinically relevant difference in efficacy or safety between insulin detemir and insulin glargine for targeting hyperglycaemia. However, to achieve the same glycaemic control insulin detemir was often injected twice-daily in a higher dose but with less weight gain, while insulin glargine was injected once-daily, with somewhat fewer injection site reactions.

Dataset Information

Insulin glargine: a reevaluation of rodent carcinogenicity findings.

Publications

Insulin glargine: a reevaluation of rodent carcinogenicity findings.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets