Dataset Information

Propofol vs midazolam plus fentanyl for upper gastrointestinal endomicroscopy: a randomized trial.

ABSTRACT:

Aim

To compare the endomicroscopic image quality of integrated confocal laser endomicroscopy (iCLE) and sedation efficacy of propofol vs midazolam plus fentanyl (M/F).

Methods

Consecutive outpatients undergoing iCLE were prospectively recruited and randomized to the propofol group (P group) or M/F group. The patient, performing endoscopist and endoscopic assistant were blinded to the randomization. The quality of endomicroscopic images and anesthetic efficacy outcomes were blindly evaluated after iCLE examination.

Results

There were significantly more good quality endomicroscopic images in the propofol group than in the M/F group (72.75% vs 52.89%, P < 0.001). The diagnostic accuracy for upper gastrointestinal mucosal lesions using confocal laser endomicroscopy favors the P group, although this did not reach statistical significance. Adverse events and patient assessment were not significantly different for M/F vs propofol except for more frequent intraprocedural recall with M/F. Procedure duration and sedation times were significantly longer in the M/F group, while the scores of endoscopist, anesthetist and assistant assessment were all significantly better in the P group.

Conclusion

Sedation with propofol might increase the proportion of good quality endomicroscopic images, and may result in improved procedural efficacy and diagnostic accuracy during iCLE examination.

SUBMITTER: Zuo XL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3332296 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Propofol vs midazolam plus fentanyl for upper gastrointestinal endomicroscopy: a randomized trial.

Zuo Xiu-Li XL Li Zhen Z Liu Xiao-Ping XP Li Chang-Qing CQ Ji Rui R Wang Peng P Zhou Cheng-Jun CJ Liu Han H Li Yan-Qing YQ

World journal of gastroenterology 20120401 15

<h4>Aim</h4>To compare the endomicroscopic image quality of integrated confocal laser endomicroscopy (iCLE) and sedation efficacy of propofol vs midazolam plus fentanyl (M/F).<h4>Methods</h4>Consecutive outpatients undergoing iCLE were prospectively recruited and randomized to the propofol group (P group) or M/F group. The patient, performing endoscopist and endoscopic assistant were blinded to the randomization. The quality of endomicroscopic images and anesthetic efficacy outcomes were blindly ...[more]

PMID: 22553407

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPatients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are often under stress and fail to cooperate well with invasive treatments. Analgesia and sedation are of great significance for reducing the suffering of patients and ensuring the application and effectiveness of treatment. For better clinical choice, we aimed to explore the effect of the combination of propofol + fentanyl or midazolam + fentanyl on the short-term prognosis of hospitalized patients in the ICU.MethodsAccording to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we retrospectively included patients in the MIMIC-IV database receiving midazolam + fentanyl or propofol + fentanyl analgesic and sedative treatment using Structured Query Language (SQL) to extract clinical data from the MIMIC-IV database. The primary endpoint was the death rate within 28 days after the patient was admitted to the ICU. Doubly robust estimation was used to infer the relationship between sedation and analgesia and 28 days outcome. The gradient boosted model (GBM) was used to estimate the propensity score (PS) of the patient's sedation and analgesia program, PS was used as the weight, and the inverse probabilities weighting (IPW) model was used to generate a weighted cohort.ResultsIn total, 4,188 cases were included, with 2,174 (51.9%) in the propofol group and 2,014 (48.1%) in the midazolam group. In the PS score matching cohort, the 28-day mortality of patients in the midazolam group was 30.8%, and the 28-day mortality of patients in the propofol group was 25.5%. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) value was 1.421 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.118-1.806, P<0.001]. Patients in the propofol group did not use vasoactive drugs for a longer period of time than the midazolam group, and patients in the propofol group received significantly more fluids than those in the midazolam group in the first three days after admission to the ICU.ConclusionsCompared with midazolam combined with fentanyl, propofol combined with fentanyl for sedation and analgesia can reduce the risk of short-term death in ICU patients.

Dataset Information

Propofol vs midazolam plus fentanyl for upper gastrointestinal endomicroscopy: a randomized trial.

Aim

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Propofol vs midazolam plus fentanyl for upper gastrointestinal endomicroscopy: a randomized trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets