Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Propofol vs midazolam plus fentanyl for upper gastrointestinal endomicroscopy: a randomized trial.


ABSTRACT: To compare the endomicroscopic image quality of integrated confocal laser endomicroscopy (iCLE) and sedation efficacy of propofol vs midazolam plus fentanyl (M/F).Consecutive outpatients undergoing iCLE were prospectively recruited and randomized to the propofol group (P group) or M/F group. The patient, performing endoscopist and endoscopic assistant were blinded to the randomization. The quality of endomicroscopic images and anesthetic efficacy outcomes were blindly evaluated after iCLE examination.There were significantly more good quality endomicroscopic images in the propofol group than in the M/F group (72.75% vs 52.89%, P < 0.001). The diagnostic accuracy for upper gastrointestinal mucosal lesions using confocal laser endomicroscopy favors the P group, although this did not reach statistical significance. Adverse events and patient assessment were not significantly different for M/F vs propofol except for more frequent intraprocedural recall with M/F. Procedure duration and sedation times were significantly longer in the M/F group, while the scores of endoscopist, anesthetist and assistant assessment were all significantly better in the P group.Sedation with propofol might increase the proportion of good quality endomicroscopic images, and may result in improved procedural efficacy and diagnostic accuracy during iCLE examination.

SUBMITTER: Zuo XL 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3332296 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Propofol vs midazolam plus fentanyl for upper gastrointestinal endomicroscopy: a randomized trial.

Zuo Xiu-Li XL   Li Zhen Z   Liu Xiao-Ping XP   Li Chang-Qing CQ   Ji Rui R   Wang Peng P   Zhou Cheng-Jun CJ   Liu Han H   Li Yan-Qing YQ  

World journal of gastroenterology 20120401 15


<h4>Aim</h4>To compare the endomicroscopic image quality of integrated confocal laser endomicroscopy (iCLE) and sedation efficacy of propofol vs midazolam plus fentanyl (M/F).<h4>Methods</h4>Consecutive outpatients undergoing iCLE were prospectively recruited and randomized to the propofol group (P group) or M/F group. The patient, performing endoscopist and endoscopic assistant were blinded to the randomization. The quality of endomicroscopic images and anesthetic efficacy outcomes were blindly  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5634622 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4315567 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5134819 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8908132 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4667140 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9373339 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5389664 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10399878 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8995981 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5767812 | biostudies-literature