Dataset Information

A common dataset for genomic analysis of livestock populations.

ABSTRACT: Although common datasets are an important resource for the scientific community and can be used to address important questions, genomic datasets of a meaningful size have not generally been available in livestock species. We describe a pig dataset that PIC (a Genus company) has made available for comparing genomic prediction methods. We also describe genomic evaluation of the data using methods that PIC considers best practice for predicting and validating genomic breeding values, and we discuss the impact of data structure on accuracy. The dataset contains 3534 individuals with high-density genotypes, phenotypes, and estimated breeding values for five traits. Genomic breeding values were calculated using BayesB, with phenotypes and de-regressed breeding values, and using a single-step genomic BLUP approach that combines information from genotyped and un-genotyped animals. The genomic breeding value accuracy increased with increased trait heritability and with increased relationship between training and validation. In nearly all cases, BayesB using de-regressed breeding values outperformed the other approaches, but the single-step evaluation performed only slightly worse. This dataset was useful for comparing methods for genomic prediction using real data. Our results indicate that validation approaches accounting for relatedness between populations can correct for potential overestimation of genomic breeding value accuracies, with implications for genotyping strategies to carry out genomic selection programs.

SUBMITTER: Cleveland MA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3337471 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A common dataset for genomic analysis of livestock populations.

Cleveland Matthew A MA Hickey John M JM Forni Selma S

G3 (Bethesda, Md.) 20120401 4

Although common datasets are an important resource for the scientific community and can be used to address important questions, genomic datasets of a meaningful size have not generally been available in livestock species. We describe a pig dataset that PIC (a Genus company) has made available for comparing genomic prediction methods. We also describe genomic evaluation of the data using methods that PIC considers best practice for predicting and validating genomic breeding values, and we discuss ...[more]

PMID: 22540034

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThis paper describes a combined heuristic and hidden Markov model (HMM) method to accurately impute missing genotypes in livestock datasets. Genomic selection in breeding programs requires high-density genotyping of many individuals, making algorithms that economically generate this information crucial. There are two common classes of imputation methods, heuristic methods and probabilistic methods, the latter being largely based on hidden Markov models. Heuristic methods are robust, but fail to impute markers in regions where the thresholds of heuristic rules are not met, or the pedigree is inconsistent. Hidden Markov models are probabilistic methods which typically do not require specific family structures or pedigree information, making them very flexible, but they are computationally expensive and, in some cases, less accurate.ResultsWe implemented a new hybrid imputation method that combined heuristic and HMM methods, AlphaImpute and MaCH, and compared the computation time and imputation accuracy of the three methods. AlphaImpute was the fastest, followed by the hybrid method and then the HMM. The computation time of the hybrid method and the HMM increased linearly with the number of iterations used in the hidden Markov model, however, the computation time of the hybrid method increased almost linearly and that of the HMM quadratically with the number of template haplotypes. The hybrid method was the most accurate imputation method for low-density panels when pedigree information was missing, especially if minor allele frequency was also low. The accuracy of the hybrid method and the HMM increased with the number of template haplotypes. The imputation accuracy of all three methods increased with the marker density of the low-density panels. Excluding the pedigree information reduced imputation accuracy for the hybrid method and AlphaImpute. Finally, the imputation accuracy of the three methods decreased with decreasing minor allele frequency.ConclusionsThe hybrid heuristic and probabilistic imputation method is able to impute all markers for all individuals in a population, as the HMM. The hybrid method is usually more accurate and never significantly less accurate than a purely heuristic method or a purely probabilistic method and is faster than a standard probabilistic method.

Project description:BackgroundHeritability partitioning approaches estimate the contribution of different functional classes, such as coding or regulatory variants, to the genetic variance. This information allows a better understanding of the genetic architecture of complex traits, including complex diseases, but can also help improve the accuracy of genomic selection in livestock species. However, methods have mainly been tested on human genomic data, whereas livestock populations have specific characteristics, such as high levels of relatedness, small effective population size or long-range levels of linkage disequilibrium.ResultsHere, we used data from 14,762 cows, imputed at the whole-genome sequence level for 11,537,240 variants, to simulate traits in a typical livestock population and evaluate the accuracy of two state-of-the-art heritability partitioning methods, GREML and a Bayesian mixture model. In simulations where a single functional class had increased contribution to heritability, we observed that the estimators were unbiased but had low precision. When causal variants were enriched in variants with low (< 0.05) or high (> 0.20) minor allele frequency or low (below 1st quartile) or high (above 3rd quartile) linkage disequilibrium scores, it was necessary to partition the genetic variance into multiple classes defined on the basis of allele frequencies or LD scores to obtain unbiased results. When multiple functional classes had variable contributions to heritability, estimators showed higher levels of variation and confounding between certain categories was observed. In addition, estimators from small categories were particularly imprecise. However, the estimates and their ranking were still informative about the contribution of the classes. We also demonstrated that using methods that estimate the contribution of a single category at a time, a commonly used approach, results in an overestimation. Finally, we applied the methods to phenotypes for muscular development and height and estimated that, on average, variants in open chromatin regions had a higher contribution to the genetic variance (> 45%), while variants in coding regions had the strongest individual effects (> 25-fold enrichment on average). Conversely, variants in intergenic or intronic regions showed lower levels of enrichment (0.2 and 0.6-fold on average, respectively).ConclusionsHeritability partitioning approaches should be used cautiously in livestock populations, in particular for small categories. Two-component approaches that fit only one functional category at a time lead to biased estimators and should not be used.

Dataset Information

A common dataset for genomic analysis of livestock populations.

Publications

A common dataset for genomic analysis of livestock populations.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets