Dataset Information

Pharmacokinetics of different dosing strategies of oral posaconazole in patients with compromised gastrointestinal function and who are at high risk for invasive fungal infection.

ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to assess different dosing strategies that may result in increased posaconazole bioavailability in patients with compromised gastrointestinal function and at high risk for invasive fungal infections. Patients undergoing chemotherapy and at risk for compromised gastrointestinal function received open-label posaconazole at 200 mg three times daily (TID) on days 1 to 8. Patients were randomized to one of three open-label dosing regimens of posaconazole on days 9 to 15: 200 mg TID, 400 mg twice daily (BID), or 400 mg TID. The plasma concentrations of interest on days 8 and 15 were 500 and 700 ng/ml, respectively; day 2 plasma concentrations of 250 and 350 ng/ml were chosen as levels that might result in steady-state concentrations of >500 and >700 ng/ml, respectively. A total of 75 patients enrolled; 52/75 (69%) completed the study, and 49/75 were included in the pharmacokinetic analyses. Mean plasma concentrations were 230, 346, and 637 ng/ml on days 2, 3, and 8, respectively. The day 15 values were 660, 930, and 671 ng/ml for 200 mg TID, 400 mg BID, and 400 mg TID, respectively. In 12 patients with a day 8 posaconazole concentration of <250 ng/ml, an overall benefit of the higher two doses was not apparent, suggesting that a subset of patients has low steady-state plasma concentrations. A change in dosing regimen on day 9 did not lead to higher exposures in these "poor absorbers" on day 15. Poor absorption may be enhanced with a high-fat meal, a nutritional supplement, or acidification.

SUBMITTER: Cornely OA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3346642 | biostudies-literature | 2012 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Pharmacokinetics of different dosing strategies of oral posaconazole in patients with compromised gastrointestinal function and who are at high risk for invasive fungal infection.

Cornely Oliver A OA Helfgott David D Langston Amelia A Heinz Werner W Vehreschild Jörg-Janne JJ Vehreschild Maria J G T MJ Krishna Gopal G Ma Lei L Huyck Susan S McCarthy Michael C MC

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 20120130 5

The aim of this study was to assess different dosing strategies that may result in increased posaconazole bioavailability in patients with compromised gastrointestinal function and at high risk for invasive fungal infections. Patients undergoing chemotherapy and at risk for compromised gastrointestinal function received open-label posaconazole at 200 mg three times daily (TID) on days 1 to 8. Patients were randomized to one of three open-label dosing regimens of posaconazole on days 9 to 15: 200 ...[more]

PMID: 22290953

Similar Datasets

Project description:Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are associated with high mortality rates and large economic burdens. Triazole prophylaxis is used for at-risk patients with hematological malignancies or stem cell transplants. We evaluated both the efficacy and the cost-effectiveness of triazole prophylaxis. A network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating fluconazole, itraconazole capsule and solution, posaconazole, and voriconazole was conducted. The outcomes of interest included the incidences of IFIs and deaths. This was coupled with a cost-effectiveness analysis from patient perspective over a lifetime horizon. Probabilities of transitions between health states were derived from the NMA. Resource use and costs were obtained from the Singapore health care institution. Data on 5,505 participants in 21 RCTs were included. Other than itraconazole capsule, all triazole antifungals were effective in reducing IFIs. Posaconazole was better than fluconazole (odds ratio [OR], 0.35 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.73]) and itraconazole capsule (OR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.97]), but not voriconazole (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.43 to 4.01]), in preventing IFIs. Posaconazole significantly reduced all-cause deaths, compared to placebo, fluconazole, and itraconazole solution (OR, 0.49 to 0.54 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.88]). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for itraconazole solution was lower than that for posaconazole (Singapore dollars [SGD] 12,546 versus SGD 26,817 per IFI avoided and SGD 5,844 versus SGD 12,423 per LY saved) for transplant patients. For leukemia patients, itraconazole solution was the dominant strategy. Voriconazole was dominated by posaconazole. All triazole antifungals except itraconazole capsule were effective in preventing IFIs. Posaconazole was more efficacious in reducing IFIs and all-cause deaths than were fluconazole and itraconazole. Both itraconazole solution and posaconazole were cost-effective in the Singapore health care setting.

Dataset Information

Pharmacokinetics of different dosing strategies of oral posaconazole in patients with compromised gastrointestinal function and who are at high risk for invasive fungal infection.

Publications

Pharmacokinetics of different dosing strategies of oral posaconazole in patients with compromised gastrointestinal function and who are at high risk for invasive fungal infection.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets