Dataset Information

Self-perceived video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy proficiency by recent graduates of North American thoracic residencies.

ABSTRACT: Minimally invasive surgical techniques offer several advantages over traditional open procedures, yet the pathway to minimally invasive proficiency can be difficult to navigate. As a part of an effort of the Joint Council of Thoracic Surgical Education to increase access to this skill set in the general thoracic community, recent graduates of thoracic residencies were surveyed to determine the self-reported achievement of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy proficiency and the merits of various educational opportunities. The objective of this study was to estimate the comfort level of recent graduates with the minimally invasive approach, as this demographic not only reflects the current status of training, but represents the future of the specialty. Surgeons graduating North American thoracic residencies between 2006 and 2008 identifying themselves as practitioners of general thoracic surgery were surveyed. A total of 271 surgeons completed training between 2006 and 2008 and indicated general thoracic to be a part of their practice (84 dedicated thoracic and 187 mixed). One hundred and forty-six surgeons completed the survey (54%) including 74 of 84 (88%) dedicated thoracic surgeons. Overall, 58% of recent graduates who perform general thoracic procedures consider themselves proficient in VATS lobectomies (86% of dedicated thoracic surgeons and 28% of surgeons with a mixed practice, P < 0.0001). Of surgeons considering themselves to be proficient at VATS lobectomies, 66% felt thoracic residency was critical or very important to achieving proficiency. Fellowships after completing board residency, animal labs, and follow-up VATS courses put on by experts were much less consistently beneficial. The vast majority of the 25 dedicated general thoracic surgeons who graduate each year consider themselves proficient in VATS lobectomies, largely due to training in their thoracic residencies. On the other hand, the minority of surgeons performing general thoracic procedures as a part of a mixed practice consider themselves proficient in VATS lobectomies. Further study is warranted to enhance the VATS lobectomy experience of mixed practice surgeons particularly during their thoracic residencies.

SUBMITTER: Boffa DJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3352699 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Self-perceived video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy proficiency by recent graduates of North American thoracic residencies.

Boffa Daniel J DJ Gangadharan Sidharta S Kent Michael M Kerendi Faraz F Onaitis Mark M Verrier Edward E Roselli Eric E

Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery 20120301 6

Minimally invasive surgical techniques offer several advantages over traditional open procedures, yet the pathway to minimally invasive proficiency can be difficult to navigate. As a part of an effort of the Joint Council of Thoracic Surgical Education to increase access to this skill set in the general thoracic community, recent graduates of thoracic residencies were surveyed to determine the self-reported achievement of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy proficiency and the merit ...[more]

PMID: 22381653

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThere are no standard guidelines regarding the number and size of chest tubes that should be selected after thoracic surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of adopting a drainage strategy with bi-pigtail catheters (BPCs) on patients undergoing lobectomy by uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).MethodsA retrospective study was performed of patients undergoing uniportal lobectomy at the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the Cancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology between August 2021 and August 2022. The patients were divided into the following two groups according to the drainage strategy adopted: (I) a traditional chest tube (TCT) group; and (II) a BPC group. The outcomes measured included postoperative complications, as measured by the Clavien-Dindo method, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores of the patients after surgery.ResultsIn total, 868 patients underwent lung resection during the study period, after exclusion, the data of 470 patients who underwent uniport lobectomy were reviewed (235 in the TCT group, and 235 in the BPC group). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of baseline data (P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications (7.7% vs. 19.1%) and postoperative VAS pain scores at 7-24 hours (3.3±1.0 vs. 3.7±1.5) and 25-48 hours (3.1±0.8 vs. 3.6±1.5) were significantly lower in the BPC group than the TCT group (all P<0.001). Additionally, the postoperative length of stay (4.6±1.5 vs. 5.4±4.5 days) and the collapse rate of the residual lung (19.2%±9.1% vs. 20.9%±9.6%) of the BPC group were better than those of the TCT group (P<0.05). The results of univariable and multivariable analyses showed that a drainage strategy with a TCT was an independent risk factor for decreased postoperative complications, and reduced moderate or severe pain scores at 7-24 and 25-48 hours after surgery.ConclusionsOur drainage strategy with BPCs decreased the incidence of postoperative complications and alleviated the postoperative pain of patients undergoing lobectomy by uniportal VATS and is safe and feasible.

Project description:BackgroundIt remains no clear conclusion about which is better between robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the short-term and long-term efficacy between RATS and VATS for NSCLC.MethodsPubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Medline, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched for studies published before December 2020. The quality of the articles was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the data analyzed using the Review Manager 5.3 software. Fixed or random effect models were applied according to heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted.ResultsA total of 18 studies including 11,247 patients were included in the meta-analyses, of which 5114 patients were in the RATS group and 6133 in the VATS group. Compared with VATS, RATS was associated with less blood loss (WMD = - 50.40, 95% CI -90.32 ~ - 10.48, P = 0.010), lower conversion rate (OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.43 ~ 0.60, P < 0.001), more harvested lymph nodes (WMD = 1.72, 95% CI 0.63 ~ 2.81, P = 0.002) and stations (WMD = 0.51, 95% CI 0.15 ~ 0.86, P = 0.005), shorter duration of postoperative chest tube drainage (WMD = - 0.61, 95% CI -0.78 ~ - 0.44, P < 0.001) and hospital stay (WMD = - 1.12, 95% CI -1.58 ~ - 0.66, P < 0.001), lower overall complication rate (OR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.83 ~ 0.99, P = 0.020), lower recurrence rate (OR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.36 ~ 0.72, P < 0.001), and higher cost (WMD = 3909.87 USD, 95% CI 3706.90 ~ 4112.84, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between RATS and VATS in operative time, mortality, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Sensitivity analysis showed that no significant differences were found between the two techniques in conversion rate, number of harvested lymph nodes and stations, and overall complication.ConclusionsThe results revealed that RATS is a feasible and safe technique compared with VATS in terms of short-term and long-term outcomes. Moreover, more randomized controlled trials comparing the two techniques with rigorous study designs are still essential to evaluate the value of robotic surgery for NSCLC.

Dataset Information

Self-perceived video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy proficiency by recent graduates of North American thoracic residencies.

Publications

Self-perceived video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy proficiency by recent graduates of North American thoracic residencies.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets