Dataset Information

A seven-marker signature and clinical outcome in malignant melanoma: a large-scale tissue-microarray study with two independent patient cohorts.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Current staging methods such as tumor thickness, ulceration and invasion of the sentinel node are known to be prognostic parameters in patients with malignant melanoma (MM). However, predictive molecular marker profiles for risk stratification and therapy optimization are not yet available for routine clinical assessment.

Methods and findings

Using tissue microarrays, we retrospectively analyzed samples from 364 patients with primary MM. We investigated a panel of 70 immunohistochemical (IHC) antibodies for cell cycle, apoptosis, DNA mismatch repair, differentiation, proliferation, cell adhesion, signaling and metabolism. A marker selection procedure based on univariate Cox regression and multiple testing correction was employed to correlate the IHC expression data with the clinical follow-up (overall and recurrence-free survival). The model was thoroughly evaluated with two different cross validation experiments, a permutation test and a multivariate Cox regression analysis. In addition, the predictive power of the identified marker signature was validated on a second independent external test cohort (n=225). A signature of seven biomarkers (Bax, Bcl-X, PTEN, COX-2, loss of β-Catenin, loss of MTAP, and presence of CD20 positive B-lymphocytes) was found to be an independent negative predictor for overall and recurrence-free survival in patients with MM. The seven-marker signature could also predict a high risk of disease recurrence in patients with localized primary MM stage pT1-2 (tumor thickness ≤2.00 mm). In particular, three of these markers (MTAP, COX-2, Bcl-X) were shown to offer direct therapeutic implications.

Conclusions

The seven-marker signature might serve as a prognostic tool enabling physicians to selectively triage, at the time of diagnosis, the subset of high recurrence risk stage I-II patients for adjuvant therapy. Selective treatment of those patients that are more likely to develop distant metastatic disease could potentially lower the burden of untreatable metastatic melanoma and revolutionize the therapeutic management of MM.

SUBMITTER: Meyer S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3369875 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Perturbations in microRNA (miRNA) expression profiles has been reported for cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM). With regards to a rapidly growing number of newly discovered miRNA sequences, the availability of up-to-date miRNA expression profiles for primary cutaneous malignant melanoma (PCMM), cutaneous malignant melanoma metastases (CMMM) and benign melanocytic naevi (BMN) is limited. Patients with PCMM (n=9), CMMM (n=4) and BMN (n=8) were included in the study. Specimens were obtained during surgery from the center of the tumors (lesional). An exploratory microarray analysis was performed by miRNA expression profiling based on miRBase V.16. Additionally, the expression levels of selected miRNA candidates were confirmed by TaqMan real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). New miRNA candidates previously not described to be associated with CMM were found to be potentially dysregulated in CMM. Nine patients with PCMM (PCMM1-PCMM9), four patients with CMMM (CMMM1-CMMM4) and eight patients with BMN (BMN1-BMN8) were enrolled in the present study. All cutaneous specimens were harvested in the operating room, immediately stored in RNAlater (Quiagen, Hilden, Germany) and kept at - 80 °C until RNA isolation. Total RNA including miRNAs was isolated using the miRNeasy Mini Kit (Quiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA concentration and purity was determined by NanoDrop ND-1000 spectral photometer (Peqlab, Erlangen, Germany). RNA integrity control (RIN) was determined by means of capillary electrophoresis with the 2100 Bioanalyzer and the RNA 6000 NanoLabCHip Kits (both Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA). To be further considered for Microarray analysis a RIN ≥ 7.0 indicating medium to good RNA quality was defined as inclusion criteria. For assessment of labeling and hybridization efficiencies total RNA samples were spiked with in-vitro synthesized oligonucleotides by using the MicroRNA Spike-In Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA). A total of 100 ng total RNA per sample were introduced into a labeling reaction. The spiked total RNA was treated with alkaline calf intestine phosphatase (CIP). The dephosphorylated RNA was labeled with the miRNA Complete Labeling and Hyb Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA) according to the manufacturer´s instructions using T4 RNA ligase, incorporating Cyanine 3-Cytidine biphosphate (pCp). The Cyanine-3-labeled miRNA samples were prepared for One-Color based hybridization with Complete miRNA Labeling and Hyb Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA) according to the manufacturer´s instructions. Labeled miRNA samples were hybridized at 55°C for 20 hrs on separate Human miRNA Microarrays Release 16.0 (8x60K format, (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA). Afterwards, microarrays were washed with increasing stringency using Gene Expression Wash Buffers (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA) followed by drying with acetonitrile (Sigma-Aldich, St.Louis, USA). Fluorescent signal intensities were detected with Scan Control A.8.4.1 Software (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA) on the Agilent DNA Microarray Scanner and extracted from the images using Feature Extraction 10.7.3.1 Software (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA). All the steps described were carried out according to the manufacturer´s instructions.

Project description:Background:Melanoma is defined as a highly mutational heterogeneous disease containing numerous alternations of the molecule. However, due to the phenotypically and genetically heterogeneity of malignant melanoma, conventional clinical characteristics remain restricted or limited in the ability to accurately predict individual outcomes and survival. This study aimed to establish an accurate gene expression signature to predict melanoma prognosis. Methods:In this study, we established an RNA sequencing-based 12-gene signature data of melanoma patients obtained from 2 independent databases: the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. We evaluated the quality of each gene to predict survival conditions in each database by employing univariate and multivariate regression models. A prognostic risk score based on a prognostic signature was determined. This prognostic gene signature further classified patients into low-risk and high-risk groups. Results:Based on a prognostic signature, a prognostic risk score was determined. This prognostic gene signature further divided the patients into low-risk and high-risk groups. In the chemotherapy and radiotherapy groups of the TCGA cohort and V-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) expression group in the GEO cohort, patients in the low-risk group had a longer survival duration compared to patients in the high-risk group. Nevertheless, the immunotherapy group in the TCGA database and neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog (NRAS) expression group in the GEO database had no significant differences in statistics. Moreover, this gene signature was associated with patient prognosis regardless of whether the Breslow depth was greater than or less than 3.75 mm. Stratified gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed that certain immune-related pathways, such as the T-cell signaling pathway, chemokine signaling pathway, and primary immunodeficiency, were significantly enriched in the low-risk group of both TCGA and GEO cohorts. This information implied the immune-related properties of the 12-gene signature. Conclusions:Our study emphasizes the significance of the gene expression signature in that it may be an indispensable prognostic predictor in melanoma and has great potential for application in personalized treatment.

Project description:Proteomic data provide a direct readout of protein function, thus constituting an information-rich resource for prognostic and predictive modeling. However, protein array data may not fully capture pathway activity due to the limited number of molecules and incomplete pathway coverage compared to other high-throughput technologies. For the present study, our aim was to improve clinical outcome prediction compared to published pathway-dependent prognostic signatures for The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohorts using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). RPPA data is particularly well-suited to the LASSO due to the relatively low number of predictors compared to larger genomic data matrices. Our approach selected predictors regardless of their pathway membership and optimally combined their RPPA measurements into a weighted risk score. Performance was assessed and compared to that of the published signatures using two unbiased approaches: 1) 10 iterations of threefold cross-validation for unbiased estimation of hazard ratio and difference in 5-year survival (by Kaplan-Meier method) between predictor-defined high and low risk groups; and 2) a permutation test to evaluate the statistical significance of the cross-validated log-rank statistic. Here, we demonstrate strong stratification of 445 renal clear cell carcinoma tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) into high and low risk groups using LASSO regression on RPPA data. Median cross-validated difference in 5-year overall survival was 32.8%, compared to 25.2% using a published receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) prognostic signature (median hazard ratios of 3.3 and 2.4, respectively). Applicability and performance of our approach was demonstrated in three additional TCGA cohorts: ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma (OVCA), sarcoma (SARC), and cutaneous melanoma (SKCM). The data-driven LASSO-based approach is versatile and well-suited for discovery of new protein/disease associations.