Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

6 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Horning SJ, Juweid ME, Schoder H, et al. Interim positron emission tomography scans in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: an independent expert nuclear medicine evaluation of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group E3404 study. Blood. 2010;115(4):775–777.

ABSTRACT:

SUBMITTER:

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3370674 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Interim positron emission tomography scans in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: an independent expert nuclear medicine evaluation of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group E3404 study.

Project description:Positive interim positron emission tomography (PET) scans are thought to be associated with inferior outcomes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. In the E3404 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma study, PET scans at baseline and after 3 cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone were centrally reviewed by a single reader. To determine the reproducibility of interim PET interpretation, an expert panel of 3 external nuclear medicine physicians visually scored baseline and interim PET scans independently and were blinded to clinical information. The binary Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study criteria were based on modifications of the Harmonization Criteria; the London criteria were also applied. Of 38 interim scans, agreement was complete in 68% and 71% by ECOG and London criteria, respectively. The range of PET(+) interim scans was 16% to 34% (P = not significant) by reviewer. Moderate consistency of reviews was observed: kappa statistic = 0.445 using ECOG criteria, and kappa statistic = 0.502 using London criteria. These data, showing only moderate reproducibility among nuclear medicine experts, indicate the need to standardize PET interpretation in research and practice. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00274924 [corrected].

| S-EPMC2815514 | biostudies-literature

Reply to Soman et al, Alffenaar et al, Metcalfe et al, and Raoult.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC4696596 | biostudies-literature

Cryobiopsy Compared with Surgical Lung Biopsy in ILD: Reply to Maldonado et al., Froidure et al., Bendstrup et al., Agarwal et al., Richeldi et al., Rajchgot et al., and Quadrelli et al.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC6812448 | biostudies-literature

Reply to Topeli et al. and to Akinosoglou et al.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7328319 | biostudies-literature

Reply to Gueret et al. and to Hammond et al.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7193864 | biostudies-literature

Reply to Turnbull et al. and to Hulme et al.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7068835 | biostudies-literature

S080_BrCaRes_Schneeweiss et al.

Project description:In patients with primary breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin plus pemetrexed followed by docetaxel (AP-D) is associated with a pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of 16.5%, and doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (AC-D) is associated with a pCR rate of 20.2%. Our primary objective was to identify single predictive genetic markers for achievement of pCR following either AP-D or AC-D treatment. Our main secondary objective was to detect treatment-group specific, pCR-predictive gene signatures.

2014-02-01 | E-TABM-1186 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Brezillon et al.

Project description:Comparison of EPC (Endothelial progenitor) versus MSC (Mensenchymal stem) at the transcriptomics level

2013-01-16 | E-MEXP-3071 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Roerr et al CGH data

Project description:Comparative genomic hybridization experiments comparing DNA from experimentally evolved yeast strains to DNA from a euploid control.

2022-12-08 | GSE220549 | GEO

Reply by Xu et al. to Haouzi et al.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7427385 | biostudies-literature