Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Applying propensity scores estimated in a full cohort to adjust for confounding in subgroup analyses.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: A correctly specified propensity score (PS) estimated in a cohort ("cohort PS") should, in expectation, remain valid in a subgroup population. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether using a cohort PS can be validly applied to subgroup analyses and, thus, add efficiency to studies with many subgroups or restricted data. METHODS: In each of three cohort studies, we estimated a cohort PS, defined five subgroups, and then estimated subgroup-specific PSs. We compared difference in treatment effect estimates for subgroup analyses adjusted by cohort PSs versus subgroup-specific PSs. Then, over 10 million times, we simulated a population with known characteristics of confounding, subgroup size, treatment interactions, and treatment effect and again assessed difference in point estimates. RESULTS: We observed that point estimates in most subgroups were substantially similar with the two methods of adjustment. In simulations, the effect estimates differed by a median of 3.4% (interquartile (IQ) range 1.3-10.0%). The IQ range exceeded 10% only in cases where the subgroup had

SUBMITTER: Rassen JA 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3383902 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Applying propensity scores estimated in a full cohort to adjust for confounding in subgroup analyses.

Rassen Jeremy A JA   Glynn Robert J RJ   Rothman Kenneth J KJ   Setoguchi Soko S   Schneeweiss Sebastian S  

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety 20111208 7


BACKGROUND: A correctly specified propensity score (PS) estimated in a cohort ("cohort PS") should, in expectation, remain valid in a subgroup population. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether using a cohort PS can be validly applied to subgroup analyses and, thus, add efficiency to studies with many subgroups or restricted data. METHODS: In each of three cohort studies, we estimated a cohort PS, defined five subgroups, and then estimated subgroup-specific PSs. We compared difference in trea  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8210692 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5860046 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5071383 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8664844 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8779003 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3202161 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4341990 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8360075 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8960330 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3725536 | biostudies-other