A randomized controlled trial of a goals-of-care video for elderly patients admitted to skilled nursing facilities.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: To determine the impact of a video on preferences for the primary goal of care.Consecutive subjects 65 years of age or older (n=101) admitted to two skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) were randomized to a verbal narrative (control) or a video (intervention) describing goals-of-care options. Options included: life-prolonging (i.e., cardiopulmonary resuscitation), limited (i.e., hospitalization but no cardiopulmonary resuscitation), or comfort care (i.e., symptom relief).Primary outcome was patients' preferences for comfort versus other options. Concordance of preferences with documentation in the medical record was also examined.Fifty-one subjects were randomized to the verbal arm and 50 to the video arm. In the verbal arm, preferences were: comfort, n=29 (57%); limited, n=4 (8%); life-prolonging, n=17 (33%); and uncertain, n=1 (2%). In the video arm, preferences were: comfort, n=40 (80%); limited, n=4 (8%); and life-prolonging, n=6 (12%). Randomization to the video was associated with greater likelihood of opting for comfort (unadjusted rate ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.9, p=0.02). Among subjects in the verbal arm who chose comfort, 29% had a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order (? statistic 0.18; 95% CI-0.02 to 0.37); 33% of subjects in the video arm choosing comfort had a DNR order (? statistic 0.06; 95% CI-0.09 to 0.22).Subjects admitted to SNFs who viewed a video were more likely than those exposed to a verbal narrative to opt for comfort. Concordance between a preference for comfort and a DNR order was low. These findings suggest a need to improve ascertainment of patients' preferences.Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01233973.
SUBMITTER: Volandes AE
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3387760 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA