Dataset Information

Docking and scoring with ICM: the benchmarking results and strategies for improvement.

ABSTRACT: Flexible docking and scoring using the internal coordinate mechanics software (ICM) was benchmarked for ligand binding mode prediction against the 85 co-crystal structures in the modified Astex data set. The ICM virtual ligand screening was tested against the 40 DUD target benchmarks and 11-target WOMBAT sets. The self-docking accuracy was evaluated for the top 1 and top 3 scoring poses at each ligand binding site with near native conformations below 2 Å RMSD found in 91 and 95% of the predictions, respectively. The virtual ligand screening using single rigid pocket conformations provided the median area under the ROC curves equal to 69.4 with 22.0% true positives recovered at 2% false positive rate. Significant improvements up to ROC AUC = 82.2 and ROC((2%)) = 45.2 were achieved following our best practices for flexible pocket refinement and out-of-pocket binding rescore. The virtual screening can be further improved by considering multiple conformations of the target.

SUBMITTER: Neves MA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3398187 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Docking and scoring with ICM: the benchmarking results and strategies for improvement.

Neves Marco A C MA Totrov Maxim M Abagyan Ruben R

Journal of computer-aided molecular design 20120509 6

Flexible docking and scoring using the internal coordinate mechanics software (ICM) was benchmarked for ligand binding mode prediction against the 85 co-crystal structures in the modified Astex data set. The ICM virtual ligand screening was tested against the 40 DUD target benchmarks and 11-target WOMBAT sets. The self-docking accuracy was evaluated for the top 1 and top 3 scoring poses at each ligand binding site with near native conformations below 2 Å RMSD found in 91 and 95% of the predictio ...[more]

PMID: 22569591

Similar Datasets

Project description:In recent years machine learning has transformed many aspects of the drug discovery process including small molecule design for which the prediction of the bioactivity is an integral part. Leveraging structural information about the interactions between a small molecule and its protein target has great potential for downstream machine learning scoring approaches, but is fundamentally limited by the accuracy with which protein:ligand complex structures can be predicted in a reliable and automated fashion. With the goal of finding practical approaches to generating useful kinase:inhibitor complex geometries for downstream machine learning scoring approaches, we present a kinase-centric docking benchmark assessing the performance of different classes of docking and pose selection strategies to assess how well experimentally observed binding modes are recapitulated in a realistic cross-docking scenario. The assembled benchmark data set focuses on the well-studied protein kinase family and comprises a subset of 589 protein structures co-crystallized with 423 ATP-competitive ligands. We find that the docking methods biased by the co-crystallized ligand-utilizing shape overlap with or without maximum common substructure matching-are more successful in recovering binding poses than standard physics-based docking alone. Also, docking into multiple structures significantly increases the chance to generate a low RMSD docking pose. Docking utilizing an approach that combines all three methods (Posit) into structures with the most similar co-crystallized ligands according to shape and electrostatics proofed to be the most efficient way to reproduce binding poses achieving a success rate of 66.9 % across all included systems. The studied docking and pose selection strategies-which utilize the OpenEye Toolkit-were implemented into pipelines of the KinoML framework allowing automated and reliable protein:ligand complex generation for future downstream machine learning tasks. Although focused on protein kinases, we believe the general findings can also be transferred to other protein families.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Molecular docking studies on protein-peptide interactions are a challenging and time-consuming task because peptides are generally more flexible than proteins and tend to adopt numerous conformations. There are several benchmarking studies on protein-protein, protein-ligand and nucleic acid-ligand docking interactions. However, a series of docking methods is not rigorously validated for protein-peptide complexes in the literature. Considering the importance and wide application of peptide docking, we describe benchmarking of 6 docking methods on 133 protein-peptide complexes having peptide length between 9 to 15 residues. The performance of docking methods was evaluated using CAPRI parameters like FNAT, I-RMSD, L-RMSD. RESULT:Firstly, we performed blind docking and evaluate the performance of the top docking pose of each method. It was observed that FRODOCK performed better than other methods with average L-RMSD of 12.46 Å. The performance of all methods improved significantly for their best docking pose and achieved highest average L-RMSD of 3.72 Å in case of FRODOCK. Similarly, we performed re-docking and evaluated the performance of the top and best docking pose of each method. We achieved the best performance in case of ZDOCK with average L-RMSD 8.60 Å and 2.88 Å for the top and best docking pose respectively. Methods were also evaluated on 40 protein-peptide complexes used in the previous benchmarking study, where peptide have length up to 5 residues. In case of best docking pose, we achieved the highest average L-RMSD of 4.45 Å and 2.09 Å for the blind docking using FRODOCK and re-docking using AutoDock Vina respectively. CONCLUSION:The study shows that FRODOCK performed best in case of blind docking and ZDOCK in case of re-docking. There is a need to improve the ranking of docking pose generated by different methods, as the present ranking scheme is not satisfactory. To facilitate the scientific community for calculating CAPRI parameters between native and docked complexes, we developed a web-based service named PPDbench ( http://webs.iiitd.edu.in/raghava/ppdbench/ ).

Dataset Information

Docking and scoring with ICM: the benchmarking results and strategies for improvement.

Publications

Docking and scoring with ICM: the benchmarking results and strategies for improvement.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets