Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Dealing with varying detection probability, unequal sample sizes and clumped distributions in count data.


ABSTRACT: Temporal variation in the detectability of a species can bias estimates of relative abundance if not handled correctly. For example, when effort varies in space and/or time it becomes necessary to take variation in detectability into account when data are analyzed. We demonstrate the importance of incorporating seasonality into the analysis of data with unequal sample sizes due to lost traps at a particular density of a species. A case study of count data was simulated using a spring-active carabid beetle. Traps were 'lost' randomly during high beetle activity in high abundance sites and during low beetle activity in low abundance sites. Five different models were fitted to datasets with different levels of loss. If sample sizes were unequal and a seasonality variable was not included in models that assumed the number of individuals was log-normally distributed, the models severely under- or overestimated the true effect size. Results did not improve when seasonality and number of trapping days were included in these models as offset terms, but only performed well when the response variable was specified as following a negative binomial distribution. Finally, if seasonal variation of a species is unknown, which is often the case, seasonality can be added as a free factor, resulting in well-performing negative binomial models. Based on these results we recommend (a) add sampling effort (number of trapping days in our example) to the models as an offset term, (b) if precise information is available on seasonal variation in detectability of a study object, add seasonality to the models as an offset term; (c) if information on seasonal variation in detectability is inadequate, add seasonality as a free factor; and (d) specify the response variable of count data as following a negative binomial or over-dispersed Poisson distribution.

SUBMITTER: Kotze DJ 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3401226 | biostudies-literature | 2012

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Dealing with varying detection probability, unequal sample sizes and clumped distributions in count data.

Kotze D Johan DJ   O'Hara Robert B RB   Lehvävirta Susanna S  

PloS one 20120720 7


Temporal variation in the detectability of a species can bias estimates of relative abundance if not handled correctly. For example, when effort varies in space and/or time it becomes necessary to take variation in detectability into account when data are analyzed. We demonstrate the importance of incorporating seasonality into the analysis of data with unequal sample sizes due to lost traps at a particular density of a species. A case study of count data was simulated using a spring-active cara  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8215919 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8320970 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6051584 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8026893 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5695383 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6466917 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7612173 | biostudies-literature