Dataset Information

Design and diversity in bacterial chemotaxis: a comparative study in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis.

ABSTRACT: Comparable processes in different species often involve homologous genes. One question is whether the network structure, in particular the feedback control structure, is also conserved. The bacterial chemotaxis pathways in E. coli and B. subtilis both regulate the same task, namely, excitation and adaptation to environmental signals. Both pathways employ many orthologous genes. Yet how these orthologs contribute to network function in each organism is different. To investigate this problem, we propose what is to our knowledge the first computational model for B. subtilis chemotaxis and compare it to previously published models for chemotaxis in E. coli. The models reveal that the core control strategy for signal processing is the same in both organisms, though in B. subtilis there are two additional feedback loops that provide an additional layer of regulation and robustness. Furthermore, the network structures are different despite the similarity of the proteins in each organism. These results demonstrate the limitations of pathway inferences based solely on homology and suggest that the control strategy is an evolutionarily conserved property.

SUBMITTER: Rao CV

PROVIDER: S-EPMC340952 | biostudies-literature | 2004 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Design and diversity in bacterial chemotaxis: a comparative study in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis.

Rao Christopher V CV Kirby John R JR Arkin Adam P AP

PLoS biology 20040217 2

Comparable processes in different species often involve homologous genes. One question is whether the network structure, in particular the feedback control structure, is also conserved. The bacterial chemotaxis pathways in E. coli and B. subtilis both regulate the same task, namely, excitation and adaptation to environmental signals. Both pathways employ many orthologous genes. Yet how these orthologs contribute to network function in each organism is different. To investigate this problem, we p ...[more]

PMID: 14966542

Similar Datasets

Project description:RasP is a predicted intramembrane metalloprotease of Bacillus subtilis that has been proposed to cleave the stress response anti-sigma factors RsiW and RsiV, the cell division protein FtsL, and remnant signal peptides within their transmembrane segments. To provide evidence for direct effects of RasP on putative substrates, we developed a heterologous coexpression system. Since expression of catalytically inactive RasP E21A inhibited expression of other membrane proteins in Escherichia coli, we added extra transmembrane segments to RasP E21A, which allowed accumulation of most other membrane proteins. A corresponding active version of RasP appeared to promiscuously cleave coexpressed membrane proteins, except those with a large periplasmic domain. However, stable cleavage products were not observed, even in clpP mutant E. coli Fusions of transmembrane segment-containing parts of FtsL and RsiW to E. coli maltose-binding protein (MBP) also resulted in proteins that appeared to be RasP substrates upon coexpression in E. coli, including FtsL with a full-length C-terminal domain (suggesting that prior cleavage by a site 1 protease is unnecessary) and RsiW designed to mimic the PrsW site 1 cleavage product (suggesting that further trimming by extracytoplasmic protease is unnecessary). Purified RasP cleaved His6-MBP-RsiW(73-118) in vitro within the RsiW transmembrane segment based on mass spectrometry analysis, demonstrating that RasP is an intramembrane protease. Surprisingly, purified RasP failed to cleave His6-MBP-FtsL(23-117). We propose that the lack of α-helix-breaking residues in the FtsL transmembrane segment creates a requirement for the membrane environment and/or an additional protein(s) in order for RasP to cleave FtsL.IMPORTANCE Intramembrane proteases govern important signaling pathways in nearly all organisms. In bacteria, they function in stress responses, cell division, pathogenesis, and other processes. Their membrane-associated substrates are typically inferred from genetic studies in the native bacterium. Evidence for direct effects has come sometimes from coexpression of the enzyme and potential substrate in a heterologous host and rarely from biochemical reconstitution of cleavage in vitro We applied these two approaches to the B. subtilis enzyme RasP and its proposed substrates RsiW and FtsL. We discovered potential pitfalls and solutions in heterologous coexpression experiments in E. coli, providing evidence that both substrates are cleaved by RasP in vivo but, surprisingly, that only RsiW was cleaved in vitro, suggesting that FtsL has an additional requirement.

Dataset Information

Design and diversity in bacterial chemotaxis: a comparative study in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis.

Publications

Design and diversity in bacterial chemotaxis: a comparative study in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets