Dataset Information

Intervention to reduce transmission of resistant bacteria in intensive care.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Intensive care units (ICUs) are high-risk settings for the transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE). METHODS:In a cluster-randomized trial, we evaluated the effect of surveillance for MRSA and VRE colonization and of the expanded use of barrier precautions (intervention) as compared with existing practice (control) on the incidence of MRSA or VRE colonization or infection in adult ICUs. Surveillance cultures were obtained from patients in all participating ICUs; the results were reported only to ICUs assigned to the intervention. In intervention ICUs, patients who were colonized or infected with MRSA or VRE were assigned to care with contact precautions; all the other patients were assigned to care with universal gloving until their discharge or until surveillance cultures obtained at admission were reported to be negative. RESULTS:During a 6-month intervention period, there were 5434 admissions to 10 intervention ICUs, and 3705 admissions to 8 control ICUs. Patients who were colonized or infected with MRSA or VRE were assigned to barrier precautions more frequently in intervention ICUs than in control ICUs (a median of 92% of ICU days with either contact precautions or universal gloving [51% with contact precautions and 43% with universal gloving] in intervention ICUs vs. a median of 38% of ICU days with contact precautions in control ICUs, P<0.001). In intervention ICUs, health care providers used clean gloves, gowns, and hand hygiene less frequently than required for contacts with patients assigned to barrier precautions; when contact precautions were specified, gloves were used for a median of 82% of contacts, gowns for 77% of contacts, and hand hygiene after 69% of contacts, and when universal gloving was specified, gloves were used for a median of 72% of contacts and hand hygiene after 62% of contacts. The mean (±SE) ICU-level incidence of events of colonization or infection with MRSA or VRE per 1000 patient-days at risk, adjusted for baseline incidence, did not differ significantly between the intervention and control ICUs (40.4±3.3 and 35.6±3.7 in the two groups, respectively; P=0.35). CONCLUSIONS:The intervention was not effective in reducing the transmission of MRSA or VRE, although the use of barrier precautions by providers was less than what was required. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; STAR*ICU ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00100386.).

SUBMITTER: Huskins WC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3410743 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Intervention to reduce transmission of resistant bacteria in intensive care.

Huskins W Charles WC Huckabee Charmaine M CM O'Grady Naomi P NP Murray Patrick P Kopetskie Heather H Zimmer Louise L Walker Mary Ellen ME Sinkowitz-Cochran Ronda L RL Jernigan John A JA Samore Matthew M Wallace Dennis D Goldmann Donald A DA

The New England journal of medicine 20110401 15

<h4>Background</h4>Intensive care units (ICUs) are high-risk settings for the transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE).<h4>Methods</h4>In a cluster-randomized trial, we evaluated the effect of surveillance for MRSA and VRE colonization and of the expanded use of barrier precautions (intervention) as compared with existing practice (control) on the incidence of MRSA or VRE colonization or infection in adult ICUs. Surveillance c ...[more]

PMID: 21488763

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIntensive care units (ICUs) are high-risk areas for transmission of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, but no controlled study has tested the effect of rapid screening and isolation of carriers on transmission in settings with best-standard precautions. We assessed interventions to reduce colonisation and transmission of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in European ICUs.MethodsWe did this study in three phases at 13 ICUs. After a 6 month baseline period (phase 1), we did an interrupted time series study of universal chlorhexidine body-washing combined with hand hygiene improvement for 6 months (phase 2), followed by a 12-15 month cluster randomised trial (phase 3). ICUs were randomly assigned by computer generated randomisation schedule to either conventional screening (chromogenic screening for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA] and vancomycin-resistant enterococci [VRE]) or rapid screening (PCR testing for MRSA and VRE and chromogenic screening for highly resistant Enterobacteriaceae [HRE]); with contact precautions for identified carriers. The primary outcome was acquisition of resistant bacteria per 100 patient-days at risk, for which we calculated step changes and changes in trends after the introduction of each intervention. We assessed acquisition by microbiological surveillance and analysed it with a multilevel Poisson segmented regression model. We compared screening groups with a likelihood ratio test that combined step changes and changes to trend. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00976638.FindingsSeven ICUs were assigned to rapid screening and six to conventional screening. Mean hand hygiene compliance improved from 52% in phase 1 to 69% in phase 2, and 77% in phase 3. Median proportions of patients receiving chlorhexidine body-washing increased from 0% to 100% at the start of phase 2. For trends in acquisition of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, weekly incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 0·976 (0·954-0·999) for phase 2 and 1·015 (0·998-1·032) for phase 3. For step changes, weekly IRR was 0·955 (0·676-1·348) for phase 2 and 0·634 (0·349-1·153) for phase 3. The decrease in trend in phase 2 was largely caused by changes in acquisition of MRSA (weekly IRR 0·925, 95% CI 0·890-0·962). Acquisition was lower in the conventional screening group than in the rapid screening group, but did not differ significantly (p=0·06).InterpretationImproved hand hygiene plus unit-wide chlorhexidine body-washing reduced acquisition of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, particularly MRSA. In the context of a sustained high level of compliance to hand hygiene and chlorhexidine bathings, screening and isolation of carriers do not reduce acquisition rates of multidrug-resistant bacteria, whether or not screening is done with rapid testing or conventional testing.FundingEuropean Commission.

Project description:BackgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) compromises the treatment of patients with serious infections in intensive care units (ICUs), and intensive care physicians are increasingly facing patients with bacterial infections with limited or no adequate therapeutic options. A survey was conducted to assess the intensive care physicians' perception of the AMR situation in the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA).MethodsBetween May and July 2017, physicians working in European ICUs were invited to complete an online questionnaire hosted by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. The survey included 20 questions on hospital and ICU characteristics, frequency of infections with multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria and relevance of AMR in the respondent's ICU, management of antimicrobial treatment as well as the use of last-line antibiotics in the six months preceding the survey. For the analysis of regional differences, EU/EEA countries were grouped into the four sub-regions of Eastern, Northern, Southern and Western Europe.ResultsOverall, 1062 responses from four European sub-regions were analysed. Infections with MDR bacteria in their ICU were rated as a major problem by 257 (24.2%), moderate problem by 360 (33.9%) and minor problem by 391 (36.8%) respondents. Third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae were the most frequently encountered MDR bacteria followed by, in order of decreasing frequency, meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Perception of the relevance of the AMR problem and the frequency of specific MDR bacteria varied by European sub-region. Bacteria resistant to all or almost all available antibiotics were encountered by 132 (12.4%) respondents. Many physicians reported not having access to specific last-line antibiotics.ConclusionsThe percentage of European ICU physicians perceiving AMR as a substantial problem in their ICU is high with variation by sub-region in line with epidemiological studies. The reports of bacteria resistant to almost all available antibiotics and the limited availability of last-line antibiotics in ICUs in the EU/EEA are of concern.

Project description:We conducted a 6-month prospective study in a newly opened ICU for high-resolution tracking of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) through environmental surveillance, patient screening, and genome sequencing. Among all ICU patients (n = 348) screened, 3.5% carried CRKP on admission and 16.3% acquired CRKP thereafter. CRKP was not detected in the environment until 10 weeks and was then isolated from 98 of 2,989 environmental samples (3.3%). The first CRKP isolate from rectal swabs (n = 37) and the first clinical isolate (n = 8) of each patient as well as the 98 isolates from environmental were subjected to whole-genome sequencing. The 143 CRKP isolates from patients and environment samples were assigned to four sequence types, with ST11 dominating (95.8%) and further divided into 14 clones, suggesting introduction of multiple clones. Subsequent CRKP transmission was complex and dynamic with 10 clones found in multiple patients and seven also detected in the environment. Two particular ST11 clones caused extensive (≥5 rooms) and persistent (≥10 weeks) environmental contamination. Both clones were associated with patients who carried CRKP throughout their prolonged ICU stay. Such "super-contaminators" are a priority for isolation and environmental surveillance. IMPORTANCE Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) is a global challenge for human health. In health care settings, patients have frequent interactions with other patients and the environment, rendering challenges for untangling the introduction and transmission of CRKP. We conducted a prospective surveillance study in a newly opened ICU for high-resolution tracking of CRKP. Our study demonstrated the dynamic, complicated transmission of CRKP and has important findings that may help to curb its spread in health care settings. First, compliance with basic measures such as routine environment cleaning and postdischarge terminal cleaning is needed to minimize the environmental contamination-driven spread. Second, active screening could demonstrate the scale of the problem, and room transfer of patients with CRKP should be prohibited whenever possible. Third, the priority for single-room isolation should be given to patients with prolonged carriage of CRKP, especially in resource-limited settings. Good infection control practice lays a foundation for tackling multidrug-resistant organisms like CRKP.

Dataset Information

Intervention to reduce transmission of resistant bacteria in intensive care.

Publications

Intervention to reduce transmission of resistant bacteria in intensive care.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets