Dataset Information

Association between TGFBR1 polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 35 case-control studies.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Numerous epidemiological studies have evaluated the association between TGFBR1 polymorphisms and the risk of cancer, however, the results remain inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relation, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of all available case-control studies relating the TGFBR1*6A and IVS7+24G>A polymorphisms of the TGFBR1 gene to the risk of cancer.

Methods

Eligible studies were identified by search of electronic databases. Overall and subgroup analyses were performed. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were applied to assess the associations between TGFBR1*6A and IVS7+24G>A polymorphisms and cancer risk.

Results

A total of 35 studies were identified, 32 with 19,767 cases and 18,516 controls for TGFBR1*6A polymorphism and 12 with 4,195 cases and 4,383 controls for IVS7+24G>A polymorphism. For TGFBR1*6A, significantly elevated cancer risk was found in all genetic models (dominant OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.04~1.18; recessive: OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.11~1.66; additive: OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.05~1.20). In subgroup analysis based on cancer type, increased cancer risk was found in ovarian and breast cancer. For IVS7+24G>A, significant correlation with overall cancer risk (dominant: OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.15~1.67; recessive: OR = 2.23, 95% CI = 1.26~3.92; additive: OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.14~1.80) was found, especially in Asian population. In the subgroup analysis stratified by cancer type, significant association was found in breast and colorectal cancer.

Conclusions

Our investigations demonstrate that TGFBR1*6A and IVS7+24G>A polymorphisms of TGFBR1 are associated with the susceptibility of cancer, and further functional research should be performed to explain the inconsistent results in different ethnicities and cancer types.

SUBMITTER: Wang YQ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3414489 | biostudies-literature | 2012

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Association between TGFBR1 polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 35 case-control studies.

Wang Yong-qiang YQ Qi Xiao-wei XW Wang Fan F Jiang Jun J Guo Qiao-nan QN

PloS one 20120808 8

<h4>Background</h4>Numerous epidemiological studies have evaluated the association between TGFBR1 polymorphisms and the risk of cancer, however, the results remain inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relation, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of all available case-control studies relating the TGFBR1*6A and IVS7+24G>A polymorphisms of the TGFBR1 gene to the risk of cancer.<h4>Methods</h4>Eligible studies were identified by search of electronic databases. Overall and ...[more]

PMID: 22905183

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundX-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) is one of the DNA repair genes encoding a scaffolding protein that participate in base excision repair (BER) pathway. However, studies on the association between polymorphisms in this gene and glioma have yielded conflicting results. This meta-analysis was performed to derive a more precise estimation between XRCC1 polymorphisms (Arg399Gln, Arg194Trp, and Arg280His) and glioma risk.MethodsData were collected from several electronic databases, with the last search up to November 28, 2012. Meta-analysis was performed by critically reviewing 9 studies for Arg399Gln polymorphism (3146 cases and 4296 controls), 4 studies for Arg194Trp polymorphism (2557 cases and 4347 controls), and 4 studies for Arg280His polymorphism (1936 cases and 2895 controls). All of the statistical analyses were performed using the software programs STATA (version 11.0).ResultsThe combined results showed that Arg399Gln polymorphism was significantly associated with glioma risk (Gln/Gln versus Arg/Arg: OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.03-2.23; recessive model: OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.01-1.73; additive model: OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.00-1.47), whereas Arg194Trp/Arg280His polymorphisms were all not significantly associated with glioma risk. As for ethnicity, Arg399Gln polymorphism was associated with increased risk of glioma among Asians (Gln/Gln versus Arg/Arg: OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.29-2.47; Arg/Gln versus Arg/Arg: OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.05-1.56; recessive model: OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.16-2.17; dominant model: OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.13-1.65; additive model: OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.15-1.52), but not among Caucasians. Stratified analyses by histological subtype indicated that the Gln allele of Arg399Gln polymorphism showed borderline association with the risk of glioblastoma among Caucasians. However, no evidence was observed in subgroup analyses for Arg194Trp/Arg280His polymorphisms.ConclusionsOur meta-analysis suggested that Arg399Gln polymorphism was associated with increased risk of glioma among Asians and borderline increased risk for glioblastoma among Caucasians, whereas Arg194Trp/Arg280His polymorphisms might have no influence on the susceptibility of glioma in different ethnicities.

Project description:ObjectiveCyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is an inducible enzyme converting arachidonic acid to prostaglandins and playing important roles in inflammatory diseases as well as tumor development. Previous studies investigating the association between COX-2 polymorphisms and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk reported conflicting results. We performed a meta-analysis of all available studies to explore this association.MethodsAll studies published up to October 2013 on the association between COX-2 polymorphisms and CRC risk were identified by searching electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library. The association between COX-2 polymorphisms and CRC risk was assessed by odds ratios (ORs) together with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsTen studies with 6,774 cases and 9,772 controls were included for -1195A>G polymorphism, 13 studies including 6,807 cases and 10,052 controls were available for -765G>C polymorphism, and 8 studies containing 5,121 cases and 7,487 controls were included for 8473T>C polymorphism. With respect to -765G>C polymorphism, we did not find a significant association with CRC risk when all eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis. However, in subgroup analyses by ethnicity and cancer location, with a Bonferroni corrected alpha of 0.05/2, statistical significant increased CRC risk was found in the Asian populations (dominant model CC+CG vs. GG: OR = 1.399, 95%CI: 1.113-1.760, P = 0.004) and rectum cancer patients (CC vs. GG: OR = 2.270, 95%CI: 1.295-3.980, P = 0.004; Recessive model CC vs. CG+GG: OR = 2.269, 95%CI: 1.297-3.970, P = 0.004). In subgroup analysis according to source of control, no significant association was detected. With respect to -1195A>G and 8473T>C polymorphisms, no significant association with CRC risk was demonstrated in the overall and subgroup analyses.ConclusionsThe present meta-analysis suggests that the COX-2 -765G>C polymorphism may be a risk factor for CRC in Asians and rectum cancer patients. Further large and well-designed studies are needed to confirm this association.

Dataset Information

Association between TGFBR1 polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 35 case-control studies.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Association between TGFBR1 polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 35 case-control studies.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets