Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Metagenomic analyses of drinking water receiving different disinfection treatments.


ABSTRACT: A metagenome-based approach was used to assess the taxonomic affiliation and function potential of microbial populations in free-chlorine-treated (CHL) and monochloramine-treated (CHM) drinking water (DW). In all, 362,640 (averaging 544 bp) and 155,593 (averaging 554 bp) pyrosequencing reads were analyzed for the CHL and CHM samples, respectively. Most annotated proteins were found to be of bacterial origin, although eukaryotic, archaeal, and viral proteins were also identified. Differences in community structure and function were noted. Most notably, Legionella-like genes were more abundant in the CHL samples while mycobacterial genes were more abundant in CHM samples. Genes associated with multiple disinfectant mechanisms were identified in both communities. Moreover, sequences linked to virulence factors, such as antibiotic resistance mechanisms, were observed in both microbial communities. This study provides new insights into the genetic network and potential biological processes associated with the molecular microbial ecology of DW microbial communities.

SUBMITTER: Gomez-Alvarez V 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3416622 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Metagenomic analyses of drinking water receiving different disinfection treatments.

Gomez-Alvarez Vicente V   Revetta Randy P RP   Santo Domingo Jorge W JW  

Applied and environmental microbiology 20120622 17


A metagenome-based approach was used to assess the taxonomic affiliation and function potential of microbial populations in free-chlorine-treated (CHL) and monochloramine-treated (CHM) drinking water (DW). In all, 362,640 (averaging 544 bp) and 155,593 (averaging 554 bp) pyrosequencing reads were analyzed for the CHL and CHM samples, respectively. Most annotated proteins were found to be of bacterial origin, although eukaryotic, archaeal, and viral proteins were also identified. Differences in c  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7136315 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7143765 | biostudies-literature
2009-04-08 | GSE15488 | GEO
| S-EPMC7085177 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4791037 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9261193 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4833019 | biostudies-literature
2013-08-11 | GSE49698 | GEO
| S-EPMC10104438 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10430769 | biostudies-literature