Dataset Information

Hydrogen-1 MR spectroscopy for measurement and diagnosis of hepatic steatosis.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:Hydrogen-1 MR spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) is gaining acceptance as a noninvasive technique for assessment of hepatic steatosis, and the findings have been found to correlate closely with histopathologic grade. The aims of this study were to validate (1)H-MRS performed with a 3-T MRI system for quantifying hepatic steatosis and to determine threshold values of (1)H-MRS proton density fat fraction corresponding to standard histopathologic grade in patients undergoing diagnostic liver biopsy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS:We conducted a prospective cross-sectional liver MRS study with 52 subjects undergoing diagnostic liver biopsy. The diagnostic accuracy of (1)H-MRS was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS:The diagnostic accuracy of (1)H-MRS for hepatic steatosis was high with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.88-1.0). Results were similar for three (1)H-MRS measurements obtained at different locations in the liver, for two independent pathologists, and whether fibrosis was present or absent. One third of participants had elevated transaminase concentrations of unknown cause, and (1)H-MRS estimates of steatosis had perfect agreement with histopathologic grade in this group. Calculated (1)H-MRS proton density fat fraction thresholds for histologic grades were less than 17% for grade 0 or trace steatosis, 17-38.6% for grade 1, and greater than 38.6% for grade 2 or higher. CONCLUSION:Hydrogen-1 MR spectroscopy is an effective, noninvasive technique that can be used to diagnose and quantify hepatic steatosis. Hydrogen-1 MR spectroscopy thresholds corresponded with histopathologic grades and may be useful in the workup of patients with elevated transaminase concentrations.

SUBMITTER: Georgoff P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3422734 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Hydrogen-1 MR spectroscopy for measurement and diagnosis of hepatic steatosis.

Georgoff Patrick P Thomasson David D Louie Adeline A Fleischman Estee E Dutcher Lauren L Mani Haresh H Kottilil Shyamasundaran S Morse Caryn C Dodd Lori L Kleiner David D Hadigan Colleen C

AJR. American journal of roentgenology 20120701 1

<h4>Objective</h4>Hydrogen-1 MR spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) is gaining acceptance as a noninvasive technique for assessment of hepatic steatosis, and the findings have been found to correlate closely with histopathologic grade. The aims of this study were to validate (1)H-MRS performed with a 3-T MRI system for quantifying hepatic steatosis and to determine threshold values of (1)H-MRS proton density fat fraction corresponding to standard histopathologic grade in patients undergoing diagnostic liver ...[more]

PMID: 22733887

Similar Datasets

Project description:To prospectively compare an investigational version of a complex-based chemical shift-based fat fraction magnetic resonance (MR) imaging method with MR spectroscopy for the quantification of hepatic steatosis.This study was approved by the institutional review board and was HIPAA compliant. Written informed consent was obtained before all studies. Fifty-five patients (31 women, 24 men; age range, 24-71 years) were prospectively imaged at 1.5 T with quantitative MR imaging and single-voxel MR spectroscopy, each within a single breath hold. The effects of T2 correction, spectral modeling of fat, and magnitude fitting for eddy current correction on fat quantification with MR imaging were investigated by reconstructing fat fraction images from the same source data with different combinations of error correction. Single-voxel T2-corrected MR spectroscopy was used to measure fat fraction and served as the reference standard. All MR spectroscopy data were postprocessed at a separate institution by an MR physicist who was blinded to MR imaging results. Fat fractions measured with MR imaging and MR spectroscopy were compared statistically to determine the correlation (r(2)), and the slope and intercept as measures of agreement between MR imaging and MR spectroscopy fat fraction measurements, to determine whether MR imaging can help quantify fat, and examine the importance of T2 correction, spectral modeling of fat, and eddy current correction. Two-sided t tests (significance level, P = .05) were used to determine whether estimated slopes and intercepts were significantly different from 1.0 and 0.0, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for the classification of clinically significant steatosis were evaluated.Overall, there was excellent correlation between MR imaging and MR spectroscopy for all reconstruction combinations. However, agreement was only achieved when T2 correction, spectral modeling of fat, and magnitude fitting for eddy current correction were used (r(2) = 0.99; slope ± standard deviation = 1.00 ± 0.01, P = .77; intercept ± standard deviation = 0.2% ± 0.1, P = .19).T1-independent chemical shift-based water-fat separation MR imaging methods can accurately quantify fat over the entire liver, by using MR spectroscopy as the reference standard, when T2 correction, spectral modeling of fat, and eddy current correction methods are used.

Project description:ObjectivesTo evaluate the relationship between biopsy-assessed hepatic steatosis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-assessed proton density fat fraction (PDFF), and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE)-assessed liver stiffness measurement (LSM), in patients with or at risk for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).MethodsA retrospective study was performed, encompassing 256 patients who had a liver biopsy and MRI/MRE examination performed within 1 year. Clinical and laboratory data were retrieved from the electronic medical record. Hepatic steatosis and fibrosis were assessed by histopathological grading/staging. First, we analyzed the diagnostic performance of PDFF for distinguishing hepatic steatosis with the receiver operating characteristic analyses. Second, variables influencing LSM were screened with univariant analyses, then identified with multivariable linear regression. Finally, the potential relationship between PDFF and LSM was assessed with linear regression after adjustment for other influencing factors, in patients with diagnosed steatosis (PDFF ≥ 5%).ResultsThe diagnostic accuracy of PDFF in distinguishing steatosis grades (S0-3) was above 0.82. No significant difference in LSM was found between patients with S1, S2, and S3 steatosis and between all steatosis grades after patients were grouped according to fibrosis stage. No statistically significant relationship was found between the LSM and PDFF (estimate = - 0.02, p = 0.065) after adjustment for fibrosis stage and age in patients with diagnosed steatosis (PDFF ≥ 5%).ConclusionsIn patients with NAFLD, the severity of hepatic steatosis has no significant influence on the liver stiffness measurement with magnetic resonance elastography.Key points• The MRI-based proton density fat fraction provides a quantitative assessment of hepatic steatosis with high accuracy. • No significant effect of hepatic steatosis on MRE-based liver stiffness measurement was found in patients with S1, S2, and S3 steatosis and between all steatosis grades after patients were grouped according to fibrosis stage. • After adjusting for fibrosis stage and age, there was no statistically significant relationship between liver stiffness and proton density fat fraction in patients with hepatic steatosis (p = 0.065).

Dataset Information

Hydrogen-1 MR spectroscopy for measurement and diagnosis of hepatic steatosis.

Publications

Hydrogen-1 MR spectroscopy for measurement and diagnosis of hepatic steatosis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets