Dataset Information

Professional language interpretation and inpatient length of stay and readmission rates.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The population of persons seeking medical care is linguistically diverse in the United States. Language barriers can adversely affect a patient's ability to explain their symptoms. Among hospitalized patients, these barriers may lead to higher readmission rates and longer hospitalizations. Trained interpreters help overcome communication barriers; however, interpreter usage among patients is suboptimal.

Objective

To investigate differences among patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) in their length of stay (LOS) and 30-day readmission rate associated with their receiving professional interpretation at admission or discharge.

Design

We analyzed the rates of interpretation at admission and discharge of all LEP patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital over a three-year period. We calculated length of stay in days and as log of LOS. We also examined 30-day readmission. Using multivariable regression models, we explored differences among patients who received interpretation at admission, discharge, or both, controlling for patient characteristics, including age, illness severity, language, and gender.

Participants

All LEP patients admitted between May 1, 2004 and April 30, 2007.

Main measures

Length of hospital stay as related to use of professional interpreters; readmission to the hospital within 30 days.

Key results

Of the 3071 patients included in the study, 39 % received language interpretation on both admission and discharge date. Patients who did not receive professional interpretation at admission or both admission/discharge had an increase in their LOS of between 0.75 and 1.47 days, compared to patients who had an interpreter on both day of admission and discharge (P<0.02). Patients receiving interpretation at admission and/or discharge were less likely than patients receiving no interpretation to be readmitted with 30 days.

Conclusions

The length of a hospital stay for LEP patients was significantly longer when professional interpreters were not used at admission or both admission/discharge.

SUBMITTER: Lindholm M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3445680 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Professional language interpretation and inpatient length of stay and readmission rates.

Lindholm Mary M Hargraves J Lee JL Ferguson Warren J WJ Reed George G

Journal of general internal medicine 20120418 10

<h4>Background</h4>The population of persons seeking medical care is linguistically diverse in the United States. Language barriers can adversely affect a patient's ability to explain their symptoms. Among hospitalized patients, these barriers may lead to higher readmission rates and longer hospitalizations. Trained interpreters help overcome communication barriers; however, interpreter usage among patients is suboptimal.<h4>Objective</h4>To investigate differences among patients with limited En ...[more]

PMID: 22528618

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceIn 2012, hospital reimbursement in Switzerland changed from a fee-for-service per diem system to a diagnosis-related group (SwissDRG) system. Whether this change in reimbursement is associated with harmful implications for quality of care and patient outcomes remains unclear.ObjectiveTo examine the association of the SwissDRG implementation with length of hospital stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, and 30-day readmission rates in the overall adult inpatient population and stratified by 5 individual diagnoses.Design, setting, and participantsThis cohort study used administrative data from the Swiss Federal Statistical Office to investigate medical hospitalizations in Switzerland from January 1, 2009, through December 31, 2015. All hospitalizations for adult medical inpatients were included in the main analysis. Patients who presented with 1 of the 5 common medical diagnoses were included in the subanalyses: community-acquired pneumonia, exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, and pulmonary embolism. An interrupted time series model was used to determine changes in time trends for risk-adjusted LOS, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day readmission after the implementation of SwissDRG in 2012. Analyses were performed from March 1, 2018, to June 30, 2018, and from November 1, 2018, to December 18, 2018.Main outcomes and measuresMonthly patient-level data for LOS, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day readmission rates.ResultsThe sample included a total of 2 426 722 hospitalized adult patients. Of this total, 1 018 404 patients (41.9%; 531 226 [52.2%] male, median [interquartile range (IQR)] age of 69 [55-80] years) composed the before-SwissDRG period; 1 408 318 patients (58.0%; 730 228 [51.9%] male, median [IQR] age of 70 [56-81] years) composed the after-SwissDRG period. The overall LOS gradually decreased from unadjusted mean (SD) 8.0 (12.7) days in 2009 to 7.2 (17.3) days in 2015. This reduction in LOS, however, was not substantially greater with the implementation of SwissDRG in 2012 (risk-adjusted slope, -0.0166 days; 95% CI, -0.0223 to -0.0110 days), with an adjusted difference in slopes of 0.0000 days (95% CI, -0.0072 to 0.0072 days). Risk-adjusted all-cause in-hospital mortality declined from 4.9% in 2009 to 4.6% in 2015, with a substantially greater decline after implementation of SwissDRG (difference between monthly slopes before and after implementation, -0.0115%; 95% CI, -0.0190% to -0.0039%). In the same period, risk-adjusted 30-day readmission rates increased from 14.4% in 2009 to 15.0% in 2015, with a greater increase after SwissDRG implementation (change in monthly slope, 0.0339%; 95% CI, 0.0254%-0.0423%). Patients with acute myocardial infarction were found to have a substantially greater increase after SwissDRG implementation in 30-day readmission rates (adjusted difference in slopes, 0.1144%; 95% CI, 0.0617%-0.1671%).Conclusions and relevanceAmong medical hospitalizations in Switzerland, SwissDRG implementation appeared to be associated with an increase in readmission rates and a decrease in in-hospital mortality but not with the gradual decrease in LOS observed in the historical control period.

Project description:BackgroundHospital length of stays (LOS) for incident of hip fracture are decreasing, but it is unknown if these changes have negative impacts on vulnerable older patient populations, like those with Alzheimer's disease (AD). We aimed to assess if persons with and without AD have different hospital LOS for hip fracture, and is the LOS associated with hospital readmissions.MethodsUtilizing register-based data for a matched cohort study nested in the Medication use and Alzheimer's disease study (MEDALZ), we collected all community-dwelling persons in Finland diagnosed with AD during 2005-2012, had incident of first hip fracture between 2005 and 2015 after AD diagnosis, and were discharged alive from an acute care hospital. Hospital LOS and hospital readmissions within 30-days and 90-days were compared between those with and without AD and risk of readmission was assessed using binary logistic regression analysis.ResultsIn this matched cohort study of 12,532 persons (mean age 84.6 years (95% CI: 84.5-84.7), 76.8% women), the median LOS in an acute care hospital was 1 day shorter for those with AD (median 4 days, IQR 3-7) than those without AD (median 5 days, IQR 3-7) (P < 0.001). However, the AD cohort had respectively 6 days and 5 days longer median LOS in a community hospital, and total hospital stay compared to the non-AD cohort (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Those with AD had fewer readmissions within 30-days (10.7%) and 90-days (16.9%) compared to those without AD (13.3% 30-days and 20.7% 90-days) (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Both cohorts had a reduced readmission risk within 30-days when the LOS in an acute care hospital was 4-14 days, compared to a LOS less than 4 days.ConclusionsPersons with AD had shorter acute care hospital LOS, but had longer LOS in a community hospital setting compared to those without AD, which is similar to other findings when comparing total hospital LOS. These findings imply that short LOS in acute care hospitals may be associated with poor health outcomes for vulnerable older populations after hip fracture.

Project description:Objective: How hospital length of stay after delivery for women with preeclampsia is associated with risk for readmission is unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate risk for 60-day hypertension-related postpartum readmission based on length of stay after delivery.Methods: The 2014 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's (HCUP) Nationwide Readmissions Database was used to analyze risk for readmission for a hypertension-related diagnosis within 60 days from cesarean delivery hospitalization for women with preeclampsia who underwent cesarean delivery. Risk for readmission was evaluated based on postoperative length of stay as well as demographic, hospital, and other obstetric factors. Population weights were applied to create national estimates. Multivariable analyses were performed with adjusted risk ratios (aRR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals as measures of effect. Mean and median hospital charges based upon postoperative length of stay were also evaluated. Time from delivery hospitalization to readmission was calculated.Results: In 2014, 65 401 women with preeclampsia underwent cesarean delivery. Of these, 1016 women (1.6%) were readmitted for a hypertension-related diagnosis. 921 of the 1016 readmissions occurred within 10 days of discharge (90.6%). In adjusted analyses, postoperative LOS 5-7 days and >7 days compared to LOS <3 days were associated with decreased risk of 60-day hypertension-related readmission (aRR 0.59 95% CI 0.45, 0.78; aRR 0.53 95% CI 0.29, 1.00, respectively). When the cohort was restricted to women with severe preeclampsia or eclampsia, LOS 5-7 days was associated with decreased risk of 60-day hypertension-related readmission in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses compared to LOS <3 days (risk ratios (RR) 0.34, 95% CI 0.18, 0.65; aRR 0.29, 95% 0.18, 0.46, respectively). Median delivery hospitalization charges were $26 512. Compared to LOS <3 days, mean and median charges increased significantly for patients with LOS 4, 5-7, and >7 days.Conclusion: Longer postoperative length of stay during cesarean delivery hospitalizations was associated with decreased risk for postpartum hypertension-related readmission. Most readmissions occurred soon after discharge. These findings support that post-delivery management may play a role in likelihood of women requiring subsequent readmission for complications related to preeclampsia after discharge.

Dataset Information

Professional language interpretation and inpatient length of stay and readmission rates.

Background

Objective

Design

Participants

Main measures

Key results

Conclusions

Publications

Professional language interpretation and inpatient length of stay and readmission rates.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets