Dataset Information

CT interpretation in a telestroke network: agreement among a spoke radiologist, hub vascular neurologist, and hub neuroradiologist.

ABSTRACT: The American Stroke Association guidelines emphasized the need for further high-quality studies that assess agreement by radiologists and nonradiologists engaged in emergency telestroke assessments and decision-making. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the level of agreement of baseline brain CT scan interpretations of patients with acute stroke presenting to telestroke spoke hospitals between central reading committee neuroradiologists and each of 2 groups, spoke hospital radiologists and hub hospital vascular neurologists (telestrokologists).The Stroke Team Remote Evaluation Using a Digital Observation Camera Arizona trial was a prospective, urban single-hub, rural 2-spoke, randomized, blinded, controlled trial of a 2-way, site-independent, audiovisual telemedicine and teleradiology system designed for remote evaluation of adult patients with acute stroke versus telephone consultation to assess eligibility for treatment with intravenous thrombolysis. In the telemedicine arm, the subjects' CT scans were interpreted by the hub telestrokologist and in the telephone arm by the spoke radiologist. All subjects' CT scans were subsequently interpreted centrally, independently, and blindly by 2 hub neuroradiologists. The primary CT outcome was determination of a CT-based contraindication to thrombolytic treatment. Kappa statistics and exact agreement rates were used to analyze interobserver agreement.Fifty-four subjects underwent random assignment. The overall agreement for the presence of radiological contraindications to thrombolysis was excellent (0.91) and did not differ substantially between the hub telestrokologist to neuroradiologist and spoke radiologist to neuroradiologist (0.92 and 0.89, respectively).In the context of a telestroke network designed to assess patients with acute stroke syndromes, agreement over the presence or absence of radiological contraindications to thrombolysis was excellent whether the comparisons were between a telestrokologist and neuroradiologist or between spoke radiologist and neuroradiologist.URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00623350.

SUBMITTER: Demaerschalk BM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3502613 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

CT interpretation in a telestroke network: agreement among a spoke radiologist, hub vascular neurologist, and hub neuroradiologist.

Demaerschalk Bart M BM Bobrow Bentley J BJ Raman Rema R Ernstrom Karin K Hoxworth Joseph M JM Patel Ameet C AC Kiernan Terri-Ellen J TE Aguilar Maria I MI Ingall Timothy J TJ Dodick David W DW Meyer Brett C BC

Stroke 20120913 11

<h4>Background and purpose</h4>The American Stroke Association guidelines emphasized the need for further high-quality studies that assess agreement by radiologists and nonradiologists engaged in emergency telestroke assessments and decision-making. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the level of agreement of baseline brain CT scan interpretations of patients with acute stroke presenting to telestroke spoke hospitals between central reading committee neuroradiologists and ea ...[more]

PMID: 22984007

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Telestroke provides access to vascular neurology expertise for hospitals lacking stroke coverage, and its use has risen rapidly in the past decade. We aim to characterize consultations, spoke behavior, and the relationship between spoke telestroke utilization (number of telestroke consults per year) and spoke alteplase treatment metrics in an academic telestroke network. METHODS AND RESULTS:We analyzed prospectively collected data on all telestroke consults from 2003 to 2018. Trends in network performance and spoke characteristics were analyzed using generalized estimating equations and Kendall ?? nonparametric tests as appropriate. Unadjusted and adjusted linear regression models determined associations between telestroke utilization and treatment metrics. The network included 2 hubs and 43 spokes with 12 803 consults performed during the study period. Network growth overall was +1.8 spokes per year, and median duration of spoke participation was 7.9 years. The numbers of consults and alteplase-treated patients increased annually, even after adjusting for the number of spokes in the network (P<0.01 for both). Although times from last seen well to spoke emergency department arrival and to consult request increased, door-to-needle time, time from teleconsult request to callback, and time from teleconsult to alteplase administration all decreased (all P<0.01). With time, the network included more spokes without a Primary Stroke Center designation. In adjusted analyses, for every 10 telestroke consults requested by a spoke, the spoke door-to-needle decreased by 1.8 minutes (P=0.02), number of patients treated with alteplase was an additional 1.7 (P<0.01), and the percent of eligible patients treated with alteplase increased by 8% (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS:Telestroke network size and utilization increased over time. Increased use of teleconsults was associated with increased and timely use of alteplase. Over time, the delivery of timely emergency care has improved significantly among emergency departments participating in this telestroke network. Replication of these findings in other networks is warranted.

Dataset Information

CT interpretation in a telestroke network: agreement among a spoke radiologist, hub vascular neurologist, and hub neuroradiologist.

Publications

CT interpretation in a telestroke network: agreement among a spoke radiologist, hub vascular neurologist, and hub neuroradiologist.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure