Dataset Information

Pathogenetic mechanisms and cardiovascular risk: differences between HbA(1c) and oral glucose tolerance test for the diagnosis of glucose tolerance.

ABSTRACT: To ascertain to which extent the use of HbA(1c) and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for diagnosis of glucose tolerance could identify individuals with different pathogenetic mechanisms and cardiovascular risk profile.A total of 844 subjects (44% men; age 49.5 ± 11 years; BMI 29 ± 5 kg/m(2)) participated in this study. Parameters of ?-cell function were derived from deconvolution of the plasma C-peptide concentration after a 75-g OGTT and insulin sensitivity assessed by homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (IR). Cardiovascular risk profile was based on determination of plasma lipids and measurements of body weight, waist circumference, and blood pressure. Glucose regulation categories by OGTT and HbA(1c) were compared with respect to insulin action, insulin secretion, and cardiovascular risk profile.OGTT results showed 42% of the subjects had prediabetes and 15% had type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), whereas the corresponding figures based on HbA(1c) were 38 and 11%, with a respective concordance rate of 54 and 44%. Subjects meeting both diagnostic criteria for prediabetes presented greater IR and impairment of insulin secretion and had a worse cardiovascular risk profile than those with normal glucose tolerance at both diagnostic methods. In a logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, and BMI, prediabetic subjects, and even more T2DM subjects by OGTT, had greater chance to have IR and impaired insulin secretion.HbA(1c) identifies a smaller proportion of prediabetic individuals and even a smaller proportion of T2DM individuals than OGTT, with no difference in IR, insulin secretion, and cardiovascular risk profile. Subjects fulfilling both diagnostic methods for prediabetes or T2DM are characterized by a worse metabolic profile.

SUBMITTER: Bianchi C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3507559 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Pathogenetic mechanisms and cardiovascular risk: differences between HbA(1c) and oral glucose tolerance test for the diagnosis of glucose tolerance.

Bianchi Cristina C Miccoli Roberto R Bonadonna Riccardo C RC Giorgino Francesco F Frontoni Simona S Faloia Emanuela E Marchesini Giulio G Dolci Maria A MA Cavalot Franco F Cavallo Gisella M GM Leonetti Frida F Del Prato Stefano S

Diabetes care 20120821 12

<h4>Objective</h4>To ascertain to which extent the use of HbA(1c) and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for diagnosis of glucose tolerance could identify individuals with different pathogenetic mechanisms and cardiovascular risk profile.<h4>Research design and methods</h4>A total of 844 subjects (44% men; age 49.5 ± 11 years; BMI 29 ± 5 kg/m(2)) participated in this study. Parameters of β-cell function were derived from deconvolution of the plasma C-peptide concentration after a 75-g OGTT and i ...[more]

PMID: 22912427

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundEarly-onset GDM often requires pharmacological treatment and is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, but data is insufficient regarding the best methods to identify high-risk women requiring early GDM screening. The aim of this study was to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of HbA1c in the prediction of (1) plasma glucose concentrations > 90th percentile in an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 12-16 weeks' gestation; and (2) pharmacologically treated early- or late-onset GDM.MethodsHbA1c was measured at 8-14 weeks' gestation in a population-based cohort of 1394 Finnish women recruited for the Early Diagnosis of Diabetes in Pregnancy (EDDIE) study between 3/2013 and 12/2016. Information on maternal risk factors were collected at recruitment. Subsequently, a 2-hour 75 g OGTT was performed at 12-16 weeks' gestation (OGTT1), and if normal, repeated at 24-28 weeks' gestation (OGTT2). Early- and late-onset GDM were diagnosed using the same nationally endorsed cut-offs for fasting, 1 h- and 2 h-plasma glucose: ≥5.3, ≥ 10.0mmol/l, and/or ≥ 8.6mmol/l, respectively. In total, 52/1394 (3.7%) women required metformin or insulin treatment for GDM, including 39 women with early-onset GDM diagnosed at OGTT1 and 13 women with late-onset GDM diagnosed at OGTT2.ResultsMaternal early-pregnancy HbA1c ≥ 35mmol/mol (≥ 5.4%) was the best cut-off to predict fasting or post-load plasma glucose > 90th percentile in OGTT1, but its diagnostic accuracy was low [AUC (95% CI) 0.65 (0.62 to 0.69), sensitivity 0.55 (0.49 to 0.60) and specificity 0.67 (0.64 to 0.70)] both alone and in combination with other maternal risk factors. However, HbA1c ≥ 35mmol/mol correlated positively with plasma glucose concentrations at all time points of OGTT1 and predicted pharmacologically treated GDM diagnosed at OGTT1 or OGTT2; AUC (95% CI) 0.75 (0.68 to 0.81), sensitivity 0.75 (0.61 to 0.86), specificity 0.64 (0.61 to 0.66).ConclusionsIn our population-based cohort, early-pregnancy HbA1c ≥ 35mmol/mol was positively associated with fasting and post-load plasma glucose concentrations in an OGTT at 12-16 weeks' gestation and predicted pharmacologically-treated early- and late-onset GDM, suggesting potential utility in first-trimester identification of women at high risk of severe GDM subtypes.

Project description:AimsWe contrasted impaired glucose regulation (prediabetes) prevalence, defined according to oral glucose tolerance test or HbA1c values, and studied cross-sectional associations between prediabetes and subclinical/clinical cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a cohort of European and South Asian origin.MethodsFor 682 European and 520 South Asian men and women, aged 58-85 years, glycaemic status was determined by oral glucose tolerance test or HbA1c thresholds. Questionnaires, record review, coronary artery calcification scores and cerebral magnetic resonance imaging established clinical plus subclinical coronary heart and cerebrovascular disease.ResultsPrediabetes was more prevalent in South Asian participants when defined by HbA1c rather than by oral glucose tolerance test criteria. Accounting for age, sex, smoking, systolic blood pressure, triglycerides and waist-hip ratio, prediabetes was associated with coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease in European participants, most obviously when defined by HbA1c rather than by oral glucose tolerance test [odds ratios for HbA1c -defined prediabetes 1.60 (95% CI 1.07, 2.39) for coronary heart disease and 1.57 (95% CI 1.00, 2.51) for cerebrovascular disease]. By contrast, non-significant associations were present between oral glucose tolerance test-defined prediabetes only and coronary heart disease [odds ratio 1.41 (95% CI 0.84, 2.36)] and HbA1c -defined prediabetes only and cerebrovascular disease [odds ratio 1.39 (95% CI 0.69, 2.78)] in South Asian participants. Prediabetes defined by HbA1c or oral glucose tolerance test criteria was associated with cardiovascular disease (defined as coronary heart and/or cerebrovascular disease) in Europeans [odds ratio 1.95 (95% CI 1.31, 2.91) for HbA1c prediabetes criteria] but not in South Asian participants [odds ratio 1.00 (95% CI 0.62, 2.66); ethnicity interaction P = 0.04].ConclusionsPrediabetes appeared to be less associated with cardiovascular disease in the South Asian than in the European group. These findings have implications for screening, and early cardiovascular prevention strategies in South Asian populations.

Dataset Information

Pathogenetic mechanisms and cardiovascular risk: differences between HbA(1c) and oral glucose tolerance test for the diagnosis of glucose tolerance.

Publications

Pathogenetic mechanisms and cardiovascular risk: differences between HbA(1c) and oral glucose tolerance test for the diagnosis of glucose tolerance.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets