Dataset Information

Evaluation of gene association methods for coexpression network construction and biological knowledge discovery.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Constructing coexpression networks and performing network analysis using large-scale gene expression data sets is an effective way to uncover new biological knowledge; however, the methods used for gene association in constructing these coexpression networks have not been thoroughly evaluated. Since different methods lead to structurally different coexpression networks and provide different information, selecting the optimal gene association method is critical.

Methods and results

In this study, we compared eight gene association methods - Spearman rank correlation, Weighted Rank Correlation, Kendall, Hoeffding's D measure, Theil-Sen, Rank Theil-Sen, Distance Covariance, and Pearson - and focused on their true knowledge discovery rates in associating pathway genes and construction coordination networks of regulatory genes. We also examined the behaviors of different methods to microarray data with different properties, and whether the biological processes affect the efficiency of different methods.

Conclusions

We found that the Spearman, Hoeffding and Kendall methods are effective in identifying coexpressed pathway genes, whereas the Theil-sen, Rank Theil-Sen, Spearman, and Weighted Rank methods perform well in identifying coordinated transcription factors that control the same biological processes and traits. Surprisingly, the widely used Pearson method is generally less efficient, and so is the Distance Covariance method that can find gene pairs of multiple relationships. Some analyses we did clearly show Pearson and Distance Covariance methods have distinct behaviors as compared to all other six methods. The efficiencies of different methods vary with the data properties to some degree and are largely contingent upon the biological processes, which necessitates the pre-analysis to identify the best performing method for gene association and coexpression network construction.

SUBMITTER: Kumari S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3511551 | biostudies-literature | 2012

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evaluation of gene association methods for coexpression network construction and biological knowledge discovery.

Kumari Sapna S Nie Jeff J Chen Huann-Sheng HS Ma Hao H Stewart Ron R Li Xiang X Lu Meng-Zhu MZ Taylor William M WM Wei Hairong H

PloS one 20121130 11

<h4>Background</h4>Constructing coexpression networks and performing network analysis using large-scale gene expression data sets is an effective way to uncover new biological knowledge; however, the methods used for gene association in constructing these coexpression networks have not been thoroughly evaluated. Since different methods lead to structurally different coexpression networks and provide different information, selecting the optimal gene association method is critical.<h4>Methods and ...[more]

PMID: 23226279

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundEwing sarcoma (ES) is the second most common pediatric bone tumor with a high rate of metastasis, high recurrence, and low survival rate. Therefore, the identification of new biomarkers which can improve the prognosis of ES patients is urgently needed.MethodsHere, GSE17679 dataset was downloaded from GEO databases. WGCNA method was used to identify one module associating with OVS (overall vital survival) and event. cytoHubba was used to screen out 50 hub genes from the module genes. Then, GSE17679 dataset was randomly divided into train cohort and test cohort. Next, univariate Cox analysis, LASSO regression analysis, and multivariate Cox analysis were conducted on 50 hub genes combined with train cohort data to select pivotal genes. Finally, an optimal 7-gene-based risk assessment model was established, which was verified by test cohort, entire GSE17679, and two independent datasets (GSE63157 and TCGA-SARC).ResultsThe results of the functional enrichment analysis revealed that the OVS and event-associated module were mainly enriched in the protein transcription, cell proliferation, and cell-cycle control. And the train cohort was divided into high-risk and low-risk subgroups based on the median risk score; the results showed that the survival of the low-risk subgroup was significantly longer than high-risk. ROC analysis revealed that AUC values of 1, 3, and 5-year survival were 0.85, 0.94, and 0.88, and Kaplan-Meier analysis also revealed that P value < 0.0001, indicating that this model was accurate, which was also verified in the test, entire cohort, and two independent datasets (GSE63157 and TCGA-SARC). Then, we performed a comprehensive analysis (differential expression analysis, correlation analysis and survival analysis) of seven pivotal genes, and found that four genes (NCAPG, KIF4A, NUF2 and CDC20) plays a more crucial role in the prognosis of ES.ConclusionTaken together, this study established an optimal 7-gene-based risk assessment model and identified 4 potential therapeutic targets, to improve the prognosis of ES patients.

Project description:BackgroundTo date, vascular dementia (VaD) lacks effective treatment in clinical practice. There is also growing evidence that VaD may be closely related to the immune response. The development of high-throughput technology, and the recently discovered group of new mediators called competitive endogenous RNAs (ceRNA), provides a unique opportunity to study the immunomodulation of VaD.MethodsIn this study, we used gene expression profiles in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database to obtain immune-related gene coexpression modules through a weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA) and gene enrichment analysis. We extracted and merged long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) and microRNA (miRNA) expressions from the GEO database and mapped them with related databases. Subsequently, we used Cytoscape to construct a lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA network, and then we performed an enrichment analysis on the mRNAs in the network to determine their regulatory function. Subsequently, we used an ImmuCellAI immune infiltration analysis and constructed a ceRNA sub-network of related immune cells. Finally, we conducted a gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) to determine the potential regulatory pathways of the key factors.ResultsAs a result, we identified the blue module as the key module of immunity and constructed the related CeRNA network. Immune infiltration analysis showed that natural killer T (NKT) cells may be the key immune cells of VaD. Using a Pearson correlation analysis, we identified that B4GALT1, PPP1R3B, MICB, HHAT, DSC2, DNA2, SCARA3, and lncRNA NEAT1 may be the key factors of VaD. Our subsequent GSEA analysis showed that lncRNA NEAT1 may be regulated by NK cells and toll-like receptors.ConclusionsOur research provides new therapeutic targets for vascular dementia from the immunological perspective for the first time, including B4GALT1, PPP1R3B, MICB, HHAT, DSC2, DNA2, SCARA3, and lncRNA NEAT1, and our research hopes to provide new treatment options for VaD.

Project description:THE MERGING OF NETWORK THEORY AND MICROARRAY DATA ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES HAS SPAWNED A NEW FIELD: gene coexpression network analysis. While network methods are increasingly used in biology, the network vocabulary of computational biologists tends to be far more limited than that of, say, social network theorists. Here we review and propose several potentially useful network concepts. We take advantage of the relationship between network theory and the field of microarray data analysis to clarify the meaning of and the relationship among network concepts in gene coexpression networks. Network theory offers a wealth of intuitive concepts for describing the pairwise relationships among genes, which are depicted in cluster trees and heat maps. Conversely, microarray data analysis techniques (singular value decomposition, tests of differential expression) can also be used to address difficult problems in network theory. We describe conditions when a close relationship exists between network analysis and microarray data analysis techniques, and provide a rough dictionary for translating between the two fields. Using the angular interpretation of correlations, we provide a geometric interpretation of network theoretic concepts and derive unexpected relationships among them. We use the singular value decomposition of module expression data to characterize approximately factorizable gene coexpression networks, i.e., adjacency matrices that factor into node specific contributions. High and low level views of coexpression networks allow us to study the relationships among modules and among module genes, respectively. We characterize coexpression networks where hub genes are significant with respect to a microarray sample trait and show that the network concept of intramodular connectivity can be interpreted as a fuzzy measure of module membership. We illustrate our results using human, mouse, and yeast microarray gene expression data. The unification of coexpression network methods with traditional data mining methods can inform the application and development of systems biologic methods.

Dataset Information

Evaluation of gene association methods for coexpression network construction and biological knowledge discovery.

Background

Methods and results

Conclusions

Publications

Evaluation of gene association methods for coexpression network construction and biological knowledge discovery.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets