Dataset Information

Analyzing illumina gene expression microarray data from different tissues: methodological aspects of data analysis in the metaxpress consortium.

ABSTRACT: Microarray profiling of gene expression is widely applied in molecular biology and functional genomics. Experimental and technical variations make meta-analysis of different studies challenging. In a total of 3358 samples, all from German population-based cohorts, we investigated the effect of data preprocessing and the variability due to sample processing in whole blood cell and blood monocyte gene expression data, measured on the Illumina HumanHT-12 v3 BeadChip array.Gene expression signal intensities were similar after applying the log(2) or the variance-stabilizing transformation. In all cohorts, the first principal component (PC) explained more than 95% of the total variation. Technical factors substantially influenced signal intensity values, especially the Illumina chip assignment (33-48% of the variance), the RNA amplification batch (12-24%), the RNA isolation batch (16%), and the sample storage time, in particular the time between blood donation and RNA isolation for the whole blood cell samples (2-3%), and the time between RNA isolation and amplification for the monocyte samples (2%). White blood cell composition parameters were the strongest biological factors influencing the expression signal intensities in the whole blood cell samples (3%), followed by sex (1-2%) in both sample types. Known single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were located in 38% of the analyzed probe sequences and 4% of them included common SNPs (minor allele frequency >5%). Out of the tested SNPs, 1.4% significantly modified the probe-specific expression signals (Bonferroni corrected p-value<0.05), but in almost half of these events the signal intensities were even increased despite the occurrence of the mismatch. Thus, the vast majority of SNPs within probes had no significant effect on hybridization efficiency.In summary, adjustment for a few selected technical factors greatly improved reliability of gene expression analyses. Such adjustments are particularly required for meta-analyses.

SUBMITTER: Schurmann C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3517598 | biostudies-literature | 2012

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Analyzing illumina gene expression microarray data from different tissues: methodological aspects of data analysis in the metaxpress consortium.

Schurmann Claudia C Heim Katharina K Schillert Arne A Blankenberg Stefan S Carstensen Maren M Dörr Marcus M Endlich Karlhans K Felix Stephan B SB Gieger Christian C Grallert Harald H Herder Christian C Hoffmann Wolfgang W Homuth Georg G Illig Thomas T Kruppa Jochen J Meitinger Thomas T Müller Christian C Nauck Matthias M Peters Annette A Rettig Rainer R Roden Michael M Strauch Konstantin K Völker Uwe U Völzke Henry H Wahl Simone S Wallaschofski Henri H Wild Philipp S PS Zeller Tanja T Teumer Alexander A Prokisch Holger H Ziegler Andreas A

PloS one 20121207 12

Microarray profiling of gene expression is widely applied in molecular biology and functional genomics. Experimental and technical variations make meta-analysis of different studies challenging. In a total of 3358 samples, all from German population-based cohorts, we investigated the effect of data preprocessing and the variability due to sample processing in whole blood cell and blood monocyte gene expression data, measured on the Illumina HumanHT-12 v3 BeadChip array.Gene expression signal int ...[more]

PMID: 23236413

Similar Datasets

Project description:STUDY QUESTION:Which methodological approaches are most appropriate for analyzing IVF data with multiple cycles in the context of a binary outcome? SUMMARY ANSWER:Both mixed effect models and generalized estimating equation (GEE) modeling approaches can account for multiple IVF cycles and may reduce bias over first-cycle only approaches, but CIs were narrowest with cluster-weighted generalized estimating equation models (CWGEE). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY:There is a lack of consensus among investigators regarding how to best incorporate data from multiple cycles and whether to present odds or risks in the analysis of IVF data. Failure to account for correlated outcomes within individuals and informative cluster size may lead to invalid CIs and biased estimates. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION:The Environment and Reproductive Health (EARTH) Study is an ongoing prospective cohort study of subfertile couples conducted at an academic medical center. This cohort was established in 2004 and follows couples seeking treatment for infertility throughout the course of their treatment and pregnancy. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS:Women aged 18-46 years enrolled in the EARTH Study from 2004 to 2017 who initiated at least one IVF cycle were eligible. Cycle initiation was defined as beginning ovulation induction with the intent to progress through an IVF or ICSI cycle. This analysis included 442 women undergoing 642 cycles who met the study inclusion criteria. We compared the results and interpretations of log-binomial and logistic models restricting to the first cycle, as well as mixed effects models, unweighted GEE models, and CWGEE models including all cycles. This analysis was conducted for two distinct exposures: maternal age at cycle initiation, and maternal preconception urinary concentrations of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) metabolites (previously reported to be associated with a decreased probability of live birth). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE:In general, the CIs were widest for mixed effects models and narrowest for CWGEE models. Further, in models evaluating the sum of urinary concentrations of DEHP metabolites (∑DEHP, available for 91% of women), the point estimates were surprisingly different between the first-cycle and multiple-cycle models. We observed significant associations between maternal age and live birth in all models. However, we observed no associations between ∑DEHP and live birth. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION:This analysis was limited to an example dataset in which the true effect of any exposure is unknown. While this allows us to observe model performance in the context of real data, future analyses should be conducted within simulated datasets under various assumptions to further evaluate the appropriateness of each approach. In addition, we did not address differential loss to follow-up in our statistical approaches. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS:The use of CWGEE models should be more widely considered in the analysis of IVF data with multiple cycles per woman. The CWGEE approach is computationally simple, addresses non-ignorable (informative) cluster size, and is robust against mis-specification of the underlying covariance structure. Among the methods compared in this analysis, CWGEE models generally yielded the narrowest CIs, possibly indicating the most precise estimates. We also stress the importance of estimating risks rather than odds in the analysis of IVF data. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S):The project was funded by Grants (R01ES022955, R01ES009718, and P30ES000002) from the National Institutes of Health. None of the authors has any conflicts of interest to declare.

Project description:Sampling the concentration of insulin in human skin using microdialysis is challenging because of low intracutaneous concentrations and low recovery, presumably due to adsorption of insulin to the microdialysis system. In this study, we aimed to (1) measure how the concentration of insulin varies in three different tissue compartments (intracutaneous, subcutaneous and intravenous) and (2) to study how much insulin is adsorbed to the microdialysis catheter membranes and tubing during a typical microdialysis experiment, both in vivo and in vitro. We hypothesized that (1) the concentration of insulin decreases from the intravenous compartment to the intracutaneous and subcutaneous tissue, and that (2) adsorption of insulin to the microdialysis membrane and tubing impairs the recovery of insulin from the tissue. In this experimental study, microdialysis catheters were inserted intracutaneously, subcutaneously and intravenously in 11 healthy subjects. Systemic endogenous hyperinsulinemia was induced by intake of an oral glucose load. Insulin concentration was measured in the dialysate and in the extracted samples from the catheter membrane and tubings. In vitro microdialysis was performed to investigate the temporal resolution of the adsorption. After an oral glucose load insulin concentration increased intravenously, but not in the intracutaneous or subcutaneous compartments, while glucose, lactate and pyruvate concentrations increased in all compartments. The adsorption of insulin to the microdialysis membrane in vivo was highest in the intravenous compartment (p = 0.01), compared to the intracutaneous and subcutaneous compartments. In vitro, the adsorption to the microdialysis membrane was highest one hour after sampling, then the concentration gradually decreased after three and five hours of sampling. The concentration of insulin in peripheral tissues is low, probably due to decreasing tissue vascularity. Adsorption of insulin to the microdialysis membrane is modest but time-dependent. This finding highlights the importance of a stabilization time for the microdialysis system before sampling tissue analytes.

Dataset Information

Analyzing illumina gene expression microarray data from different tissues: methodological aspects of data analysis in the metaxpress consortium.

Publications

Analyzing illumina gene expression microarray data from different tissues: methodological aspects of data analysis in the metaxpress consortium.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets