Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) in a Patient Affected by Metastatic Breast Cancer with Neuroendocrine Differentiation.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent cancer in European women with nearly 30% of the patients eventually developing metastases. Neuroendocrine differentiation is a rare event, but overexpression of somatostatin receptors in BC has been reported in many studies.Case report
A patient with liver metastases from BC was treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Computed tomography scan and biochemical examinations showed a clear response to radionuclide therapy.Conclusion
PRRT may be useful in metastatic BC patients.
SUBMITTER: Savelli G
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3518936 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Purpose177Lu-Dotatate is an emerging treatment modality for patients with unresectable or metastatic well-differentiated NETs. This study examines survival predictors in patients who received 177Lu-Dotatate.MethodsA retrospective single-center review was conducted, examining 47 individuals with progressive well-differentiated NETs treated with 177Lu-Dotatate (four induction cycles of 5.5 GBq at 10-week intervals followed by eight maintenance cycles of 3.7 GBq at 6-month intervals).ResultsMedian follow-up was 63.1 months with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 34.1 months. However, median overall survival (OS) was not reached at the time of analysis. The presence of ≥ 5 bone metastases (hazard ratio HR 4.33; p = 0.015), non-gastroenteropancreatic (non-GEP) NETs (HR 3.22; p = 0.025) and development of interim ascites (HR 3.15; p = 0.047) independently predicted a worse OS. Patients with chromogranin A of ≥ 4 × upper limit of normal (ULN) had shorter OS (p < 0.001) and PFS (p = 0.004). Similarly, those with pre-existing ascites demonstrated a worse OS (p = 0.009) and PFS (p = 0.026). Liver metastases involving greater than 50% liver volume and the existence of unusual metastatic locations had a negative impact on OS (p = 0.033) and PFS (p = 0.026), respectively.ConclusionHigh burden of skeletal and hepatic metastases, non-GEP-NETs, chromogranin A of ≥ 4 × ULN, unusual metastatic sites, pre-existing and interim ascites are predictors of poor outcomes in patients treated with 177Lu-Dotatate. These common indicators can be used for the risk stratification and identification of patients most likely to benefit from PRRT.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02236910, Retrospectively registered on September, 2014.
| S-EPMC8752529 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPatients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the gastroenteropancreatic tract (GEP-NET) were effectively treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with Lu-177-DOTATATE in the NETTER-1 trial. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of metastatic GEP-NET patients within a European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) certified center of excellence after this treatment.MethodsA total of 41 GEP-NET patients who received PRRT with Lu-177-DOTATATE between 2012 and 2017 at a single center were included in this analysis. Data on pre- and post-PRRT treatments [selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT), somatostatin analogue therapy (SSA), blood parameters, patient symptomatic burden and overall survival] was extracted from patient records.ResultsOverall, PRRT was well tolerated and did not increase patient symptomatic burden. Blood parameters were not significantly affected by PRRT (means before and after therapy: hemoglobin: 125.4 vs. 122.3 mg/L, P=0.201; creatinine: 73.8 vs. 77.7 µmol/L, P=0.146), while leukocytes (6.6 vs. 5.6 G/L, P<0.01) and platelets (269.9 vs. 216.7 G/L, P<0.001) were significantly decreased yet without clinical significance in our study. Seven of 9 patients with SIRT treatment prior to PRRT were deceased (mortality odds ratio =4.083). The mortality odds ratio of patients with a pancreatic tumor and SIRT was 1.33 compared to patients with a different tumor origin. 6 of 15 patients (40%) with post-PRRT SSA were deceased (mortality odds ratio =0.429 without SSA after PRRT).ConclusionsPatients with advanced GEP-NET might benefit from PRRT with Lu-177-DOTATATE as it can provide a valuable treatment modality in advanced disease stages. Safety profiles of PRRT were manageable without increasing the symptomatic burden. SIRT before PRRT or lack of SSA after PRRT seem to impair the response and reduce survival.
| S-EPMC10331769 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an approved treatment modality for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NETs), Although Phase III randomised clinical trial data is not available for NETs of other site of origin, in practice, PRRT is used more widely in clinical practice, based on its mechanism of targeting the somatostatin receptor. Use of PRRT for lung (bronchial) NET, specifically typical and atypical carcinoid (TC, AC), has been reported only in small retrospective case series. This multicentre study adds to the evidence regarding utility of PRRT for lung NETs. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A retrospective chart review of patients with TC and AC who received 177Lu-dotatate PRRT between January 2002 and June 2019 in six hospitals across Australia was undertaken. Data regarding demographics, efficacy and toxicity was evaluated at each site by the treating clinician. RESULTS:Forty-eight patients (32 AC, 15 TC, 1 unclassified) received a median of four 177Lu-dotatate treatments. There was a median of one prior line of systemic treatment (range: 0-3). The response rate to 177Lu-dotatate was 33%, with a median overall survival of 49 months (range of 3-91), at a median follow up of 33 months. This compares favourably with GEP NET. Overall toxicity was recorded as modest. CONCLUSIONS:177Lu-dotatate PRRT in patients with lung NETs is used in real world practice, where it appears well-tolerated with some efficacy. Further evidence could be obtained through a global prospective clinical or registry trial.
| S-EPMC7343632 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Since its approval in 2018 by the US Food and Drug Administration, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has become a mainstay in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Lutetium-177-DOTATATE, the only approved agent, is indicated for the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumors. Although patient selection appears straightforward with somatostatin receptor-positron emission tomography, there is considerable complexity when deciding which patients to treat and when to start PRRT. Herein, we review the many factors that affect patient selection, focusing on the optimal patients to treat. Although significant effort has been expended to determine which patients benefit the most from PRRT, a validated predictive biomarker remains elusive. Although PRRT has been used for more than 2 decades in Europe and standards of care exist for safe treatment, there remain numerous questions regarding when PRRT should be used relative to other treatments. It is important to remember that multidisciplinary discussions are essential. Currently, there are a number of ongoing studies looking to assess the efficacy of PRRT compared with other treatment options and to optimize treatment through combination therapy, different dosing strategies, or use of different radionuclides and radioligands.
| S-EPMC9390818 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Purpose To evaluate the predictive value of 7-week apparent diffusion coefficient change from baseline (ADCratio7w) at whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI (WB-DWI MRI) after one peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) cycle to predict outcome in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumor (mNET). Materials and Methods From April 2009 to May 2012, participants in a prospective clinical trial investigating yttrium 90-DOTA Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide (DOTATOC) treatment for mNET (EudraCT no. 2008-007965-22) underwent WB-DWI MRI and gallium 68 (68Ga)-DOTATOC PET/CT before and 7 weeks after one PRRT cycle. ADCratio7w response was compared with the 7-week Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 and 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT quantitative responses to predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with Cox regression analysis. Results Forty participants were analyzed (mean age, 60 years ± 11 [SD]; 21 men). Median PFS and OS were 10.5 months (range, 2-36 months) and 18 months (range, 3-81 months), respectively. Survival analysis showed significantly positive effects on PFS by age (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.96, P = .007), tumor grade (HR = 2.84, P = .006), Ki-67 index (HR = 1.05, P = .01), ADCratio7w of the least-responding lesion (ADCratio7w-least) (HR = 0.94, P < .001), and baseline mean standardized uptake values (SUVmean) (HR = 0.89, P = .02), with ADCratio7w-least and SUVmean remaining significant in multivariable analysis (P < .001, P = .02, respectively). There were significantly positive effects on OS by pretreatment lesion volume (HR = 1.004, P = .004), tumor grade (HR = 2.14, P = .04), Ki-67 index (HR = 1.05, P = .01), and ADCratio7w-least (HR = 0.97, P < .001), with pretreatment volume and ADCratio7w-least remaining significant at multivariable analysis (P = .005, P = .002, respectively). Conclusion The ADCratio7w after start of PRRT for mNET was an independent predictor of patient outcome. Keywords: MR-Diffusion-Weighted Imaging, Radionuclide Therapy, Whole-Body Imaging, Metastases, Tumor Response, Treatment Effects EudraCT no. 2008-007965-22 © RSNA, 2022.
| S-EPMC9152691 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are described by the World Health Organization (WHO) classification by grade (1-3) and degree of differentiation. Grade 1 and 2; well differentiated PNETs are often characterized as relatively "indolent" tumors for which locoregional therapies have been shown to be effective for palliation of symptom control and prolongation of survival even in the setting of advanced disease. The treatment of liver metastases includes surgical and non-surgical modalities with varying degrees of invasiveness; efficacy; and risk. Most of these modalities have not been prospectively compared. This paper reviews literature that has been published on treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine liver metastases using surgery; liver directed embolization and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Surgery is associated with the longest survival in patients with resectable disease burden. Liver-directed (hepatic artery) therapies can sometimes convert patients with borderline disease into candidates for surgery. Among the three embolization modalities; the preponderance of data suggests chemoembolization offers superior radiographic response compared to bland embolization and radioembolization; but all have similar survival. PRRT was initially approved as salvage therapy in patients with advanced disease that was not amenable to resection or embolization; though the role of PRRT is evolving rapidly.
| S-EPMC9599940 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Opinion statementThe treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) liver metastases involves a multidisciplinary approach that includes liver-directed therapies (LDT) and systemic treatments, such as peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). LDT has demonstrated efficacy in rapidly reducing tumor bulk, improving symptoms, and delaying disease progression. Interventional radiologists should be consulted prior to switching therapy for patients with progressive or symptomatic neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases. Long-term follow-up data on the safety of Yttrium-90 radioembolization before and after PRRT remain limited. Therefore, a more conservative approach may be to preferentially employ transarterial embolization (TAE) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients' somatostatin receptor-avid disease who may be future candidates for PRRT. Notable exceptions where radioembolization may be a preferred treatment strategy may be patients with history of biliary tract instrumentation, asymmetric unilobar disease distribution, and rapidly progressive diffuse liver involvement. Selection of local treatment modality, sequencing, and combination of LDT with systemic therapy require further investigation.
| S-EPMC10781814 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a paradigm shifting approach to the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Although there are no prospective randomized trials directly studying PRRT in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs), there are data to suggest benefit in this patient population. Collectively, the data, consisting of two prospective and six retrospective studies, show a median PFS ranging from 20 to 39 months and a median OS ranging from 37 to 79 months. There are ongoing (and upcoming) prospective, randomized trials of PRRT in panNETs, which will provide further evidence to support this approach.
| S-EPMC7205451 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a well-established treatment in somatostatin receptor-expressing neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). The safety and efficacy of PRRT in >79 years old patients (EP) have not been systematically investigated. All patients with inoperable/metastatic/progressive G1/G2 NET, >79 years (EP), treated with PRRT at the University Hospital of Basel between 2006 and 2018, were enrolled in this retrospective matched cohort study. Each patient was manually matched with ≥1 younger patient (YP = 60-70 years). The primary endpoint was toxicity. Toxicity (subacute, long-term) was graded according to the criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v5.0. All toxicity grades ≥ 3, or whose delta (Δ) to baseline were ≥2, were considered significant. The odds ratio (OR) for developing toxicity was tested for non-inferiority of EP vs. YP. Clinical response to PRRT and overall survival (OS) were assessed as secondary outcome measures. Forty-eight EP and 68 YP were enrolled. Both cohorts were balanced regarding median time since diagnosis, tumour location, grading, treatment scheme, and baseline biochemical parameters, except for eGFR (EP: 61 ± 16 vs. YP: 78 ± 19; mL/min/1.73 m2). Twenty-two grade ≥ 3 or Δ ≥ 2 subacute hematotoxicities occurred in 10 EP (10.3% of cycles) and 37 in 19 YP (11.6% of cycles; p = NS). Long-term grade ≥ 3 renal toxicity occurred in 7 EP and 2 YP (p = NS). The median OS was 3.4 years (EP) vs. 6.0 years (YP), HR: 1.50 [0.75, 2.98], p = NS. PRRT is a valid therapeutic option in elderly NET patients with similar toxicity and non-inferior survival compared to matched younger patients.
| S-EPMC8699207 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPeptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs is an innovative treatment for advanced somatostatin-positive neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). PRRT cannot be performed in Japan because there is no approval or insurance cover so far.MethodsWe relied on foreign institutions to perform PRRT for Japanese patients with NETs. We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of PRRT. The inclusion criteria were pathologically confirmed well-differentiated NET and visible tumor uptake on pre-therapeutic somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. 177 Lu-DOTA-TOC was used as the standard treatment, and patients received three infusions every 8 weeks. Until the end of 2017, combination treatment with 90 Y and 177 Lu-DOTA-TOC was performed using the same protocol.ResultsThirty-five patients were evaluated, and the primary lesions were pancreas, rectum, small intestine, stomach, and other locations. The partial response rate was 42.9%. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.8 months and overall survival was 42.8 months. There was no significant difference in PFS between front-line and late-line PRRT (11.0 months vs 28.0 months; P = .383). Severe adverse events included lymphocytopenia (20.0%) and thrombocytopenia (5.7%). Myelodysplastic syndrome occurred in one case.ConclusionPRRT was effective and safe for Japanese patients with advanced NETs. PRRT was equally effective as front-line and late-line treatment.
| S-EPMC9292713 | biostudies-literature