Dataset Information

Assessing the knowledge of sudden unexpected death in the young among Canadian medical students and recent graduates: a cross-sectional study.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To determine the level of knowledge concerning Sudden Unexpected Death in the Young (SUDY) among Canadian medical students and recent graduates (?5 years after graduating).

Design

A cross-sectional study was conducted by distributing a standardised, multiple choice, online questionnaire which assessed basic knowledge of SUDY.

Setting

Canadian medical schools and residency training programmes.

Participants

614 Canadian medical students (in either their penultimate or final year) and recent graduates (?5 years after graduating) completed an anonymous online questionnaire.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

The level of knowledge regarding molecular aetiology, clinical presentation, pharmacological management and modes of inheritance of six of the commonest conditions causing SUDY, including hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), Brugada syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), long QT syndrome (LQT) and Wolff-Parkinson White syndrome (WPW), were compared between medical students and recent graduates. Questions were broken down into basic knowledge and advanced categories and analysed as a secondary outcome measure.

Results

Of 614 responses, approximately two-thirds were answered by recent graduates, who generally scored 10% higher on all subject categories than medical students. Overall, questions regarding HCM were best answered (40%), followed by WPW syndrome (32%), CPVT (30%), ARVC (23%), Brugada syndrome (21%) and LQT syndrome (17%). Questions categorised as basic knowledge were answered 30% and 39% correctly in medical student and recent graduate groups, respectively, and those in the advanced category were answered 20% and 25% correctly.

Conclusions

Survey respondents fared poorly when answering questions regarding SUDY, which may be a reflection of inadequate medical education regarding these disorders. Standardised teaching regarding SUDY needs to occupy a stronger focus in Canadian medical curricula in order to prevent more unnecessary deaths by these syndromes in the future.

SUBMITTER: Huisma FF

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3533023 | biostudies-literature | 2012

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Assessing the knowledge of sudden unexpected death in the young among Canadian medical students and recent graduates: a cross-sectional study.

Huisma Felicity F FF Potts James E JE Gibbs Karen A KA Sanatani Shubhayan S

BMJ open 20121214 6

<h4>Objective</h4>To determine the level of knowledge concerning Sudden Unexpected Death in the Young (SUDY) among Canadian medical students and recent graduates (≤5 years after graduating).<h4>Design</h4>A cross-sectional study was conducted by distributing a standardised, multiple choice, online questionnaire which assessed basic knowledge of SUDY.<h4>Setting</h4>Canadian medical schools and residency training programmes.<h4>Participants</h4>614 Canadian medical students (in either their penul ...[more]

PMID: 23242483

Similar Datasets

Project description:Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is a common cause of mortality in patients with the disease, but it is unknown how neurologists disclose this risk when counseling patients.This study aimed at examining SUDEP discussion practices of neurologists in the U.S. and Canada.An electronic, web-based survey was sent to 17,558 neurologists in the U.S. and Canada. Survey questions included frequency of SUDEP discussion, reasons for discussing/not discussing SUDEP, timing of SUDEP discussions, and perceived patient reactions. We examined factors that influence the frequency of SUDEP discussion and perceived patient response using multivariate logistic regression.The participants of this study were neurologists who completed postgraduate training and devoted >5% of their time to patient care.There was a response rate of 9.3%; 1200 respondents met eligibility criteria and completed surveys. Only 6.8% of the respondents discussed SUDEP with nearly all (>90% of the time) of their patients with epilepsy/caregivers, while 11.6% never discussed it. Factors that independently predicted whether SUDEP was discussed nearly all of the time were the following: number of patients with epilepsy seen annually (OR=2.01, 95% CI=1.20-3.37, p<0.01) and if the respondent had a SUDEP case in the past 24 months (OR=2.27, 95% CI=1.37-3.66, p<0.01). A majority of respondents (59.5%) reported that negative reactions were the most common response to a discussion of SUDEP. Having additional epilepsy/neurophysiology training was associated with an increased risk of a perceived negative response (OR=1.36, 95% CI=1.02-1.82, p=0.038), while years in practice (OR=0.85, 95% CI=0.77-0.95, p<0.005) and seeing both adults and children were associated with a decreased likelihood of negative response (OR=0.15, 95% CI=0.032-0.74, p=0.02).U.S. and Canadian neurologists rarely discuss SUDEP with all patients with epilepsy/caregivers though discussions are more likely among neurologists who frequently see patients with epilepsy or had a recent SUDEP in their practice. Perceived negative reactions to SUDEP discussions are common but not universal; more experienced neurologists may be less likely to encounter negative reactions, suggesting that there may be ways to frame the discussion that minimizes patient/caregiver distress.

Project description:BackgroundPhysicians in Argentina smoke at rates similar to the general population, and do not have a clear role in tobacco control strategies.ObjectiveTo describe the attitudes and knowledge of medical students and recent graduates towards smoking behavior in Argentina.DesignCross-sectional self-administered online survey conducted in 2011.ParticipantsMedical students and recent medical graduates from the University of Buenos Aires.Main measuresAttitudes and knowledge were evaluated by responses to 16 statements regarding the effects of smoking cigarettes and the role of physicians in tobacco control. Rates of agreement with a full ban on indoor smoking in different public settings were assessed.Key resultsThe sample included 1659 participants (response rate: 35.1 %), 453 of whom (27.3 %) were current smokers. Only 52 % of participants agreed that doctors should set an example for their patients by not smoking, 30.9 % thought that medical advice had little effect on patients' cessation behavior, and 19.4 % believed that physicians could decline to care for smoking patients who failed to quit. In adjusted logistic regression models, current smokers had less supportive attitudes about tobacco control and were less likely than non-smokers to agree with a full indoor smoking ban in hospitals (OR: 0.30; 95 % CI 0.16-0.58), universities (OR: 0.55; 95 % CI 0.41-0.73), workplaces (OR: 0.67; 95 % CI 0.50-0.88), restaurants (OR: 0.42; 95 % CI 0.33-0.53), cafes (OR: 0.41; 95 % CI 0.33-0.51), nightclubs (OR: 0.32; 95 % CI 0.25-0.40), and bars (0.35; 95 % CI 0.28-0.45). Recent medical graduates had more accurate knowledge about cessation and were more likely to agree with a full smoking ban in recreational venues.ConclusionsAlthough most participants reported a strong anti-tobacco attitude, a proportion still failed to recognize the importance of their role as physicians in tobacco control strategies. Current smokers and current students were less likely to support indoor smoking bans. Specific educational curricula could address these factors.

Dataset Information

Assessing the knowledge of sudden unexpected death in the young among Canadian medical students and recent graduates: a cross-sectional study.

Objective

Design

Setting

Participants

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Assessing the knowledge of sudden unexpected death in the young among Canadian medical students and recent graduates: a cross-sectional study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets