Project description:We present an evidence-based approach to optimize the biologic incorporation of osteochondral allografts: (1) The donor graft is gradually rewarmed to room temperature to reverse the metabolic suppression from cold storage. (2) The graft is harvested while submerged in saline to limit thermal necrosis. (3) Subchondral bone depth is preferred at 4 to 6 mm depth (total plug depth ∼5-8 mm including articular cartilage) to reduce graft immunogenicity and to promote incorporation. (4) The bone is prepared with grooves/beveling to decrease impaction forces, increase access to subchondral deep zones during preparation, and promote graft-host interface healing. (5) High-pressure pulsed lavage is used to reduce antigenicity by removing marrow elements. (6) Pressurized carbon dioxide following pulsed lavage further reduces marrow elements and improves graft porosity for orthobiologic incorporation. (7) Orthobiologic substances (e.g., concentrated bone marrow aspirate) may enhance incorporation on imaging and result in greater osteogenic potential. (8) A suture is placed behind the graft to facilitate removal and repositioning; atraumatic graft insertion without high impaction forces maintains chondrocyte viability. These evidence-based pearls for osteochondral allograft handling optimize metabolic activity, reduce thermal necrosis, reduce antigenicity with removal of marrow elements, enhance biologic potential, and maintain chondrocyte viability to optimize biologic healing and clinical success.
Project description:BackgroundWhen the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology (ABPN) eliminated the oral segment of the board-certification examination, it began requiring in-training assessments termed Clinical Skill Evaluations (CSEs).ObjectiveThis study describes the experience of residency program directors (PDs) with CSEs and identifies opportunities for improvement.MethodsA 23-question survey was administered electronically to neurology, child neurology, and psychiatry PDs assessing their CSE testing procedures in April 2019. Data from the ABPN preCERT® Credentialing System CSE was analyzed to corroborate the survey results.ResultsA total of 439 PDs were surveyed. The overall response rate was approximately 40% with a similar response across the 3 specialties. Overall, there was a strong enthusiasm for CSEs as they captured the essence of the physician-patient relationship. Most PDs encouraged trainees to attempt CSEs early in their training though the completion time frame varied by specialty. Approximately 57% of psychiatry residencies offered formal, in-person faculty training while less than one-fourth of neurology and child neurology programs offered such a program. Most PDs are interested in a faculty development course to ensure a standardized CSE testing process at their institution.ConclusionsThis survey confirmed earlier findings that CSEs are usually implemented early in the course of residency training and that most PDs think it captures the essence of the physician-patient relationship. While few residencies offer a CSE training course, there is widespread support for a formal approach to faculty development and this offers a specific opportunity for CSE improvement in the future.
Project description:Since the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) subunits were cloned less than two decades ago, a substantial amount of research has been invested into understanding their physiological function in the healthy CNS. Research has also been directed at their pathological roles in various neurological diseases, including disorders resulting from acute excitotoxic insults (eg, ischaemic stroke, traumatic brain injury), diseases due to chronic neurodegeneration (eg, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and Huntington's diseases and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), disorders arising from sensitisation of neurons (eg, epilepsy, neuropathic pain), and neurodevelopmental disorders associated with NMDAR hypofunction (eg, schizophrenia). Selective NMDAR antagonists have not produced positive results in clinical trials. However, there are other NMDAR-targeted therapies used in current practice that are effective for treating some neurological disorders. In this Review, we describe the evidence for the use of these therapies and provide an overview of drugs being investigated in clinical trials. We also discuss new NMDAR-targeted strategies in clinical neurology.