Dataset Information

A reevaluation of the morphology, paleoecology, and phylogenetic relationships of the enigmatic walrus Pelagiarctos.

ABSTRACT:

Background

A number of aberrant walruses (Odobenidae) have been described from the Neogene of the North Pacific, including specialized suction-feeding and generalist fish-eating taxa. At least one of these fossil walruses has been hypothesized to have been a specialized predator of other marine mammals, the middle Miocene walrus Pelagiarctos thomasi from the Sharktooth Hill Bonebed of California (16.1-14.5 Ma).

Methodology/principal findings

A new specimen of Pelagiarctos from the middle Miocene "Topanga" Formation of southern California (17.5-15 Ma) allows a reassessment of the morphology and feeding ecology of this extinct walrus. The mandibles of this new specimen are robust with large canines, bulbous premolars with prominent paraconid, metaconid, hypoconid cusps, crenulated lingual cingula with small talonid basins, M₂ present, double-rooted P₃-M₁, single-rooted P₁ and M₂, and a P₂ with a bilobate root. Because this specimen lacks a fused mandibular symphysis like Pelagiarctos thomasi, it is instead referred to Pelagiarctos sp. This specimen is more informative than the fragmentary holotype of Pelagiarctos thomasi, permitting Pelagiarctos to be included within a phylogenetic analysis for the first time. Analysis of a matrix composed of 90 cranial, dental, mandibular and postcranial characters indicates that Pelagiarctos is an early diverging walrus and sister to the late Miocene walrus Imagotaria downsi. We reevaluate the evidence for a macropredatory lifestyle for Pelagiarctos, and we find no evidence of specialization towards a macrophagous diet, suggesting that Pelagiarctos was a generalist feeder with the ability to feed on large prey.

Conclusions/significance

This new specimen of Pelagiarctos adds to the knowledge of this problematic taxon. The phylogenetic analysis conclusively demonstrates that Pelagiarctos is an early diverging walrus. Pelagiarctos does not show morphological specializations associated with macrophagy, and was likely a generalist predator, feeding on fish, invertebrates, and the occasional warm-blooded prey item.

SUBMITTER: Boessenecker RW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3546998 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Here, I review phylogenetic studies of the lizard family Pygopodidae, a group of 47 extant species that diversified in Australia and New Guinea. The goal of this study was to examine published phylogenetic and phylogenomic hypotheses on pygopodids to identify the strengths and weaknesses in our understanding of their phylogeny. Many parts of the pygopodid family tree are well established by multiple independent tree inferences including: (1) all multispecies genera (i.e., Aprasia, Delma, Lialis, Pletholax, and Pygopus) are monophyletic groups; (2) the root of the pygopodid tree is located along the branch leading to the Delma clade, thus showing that Delma is the sister group to all other pygopodid genera; (3) the Aprasia repens group, Delma tincta group, and several other groups of closely related species are demonstrated to be monophyletic entities; and (4) the monotypic Paradelma orientalis is the sister lineage to the Pygopus clade. Based on accumulated phylogenetic evidence, two taxonomic recommendations are given: Paradelma merits generic status rather than being subsumed into Pygopus as some earlier studies had suggested, and the monotypic Aclys concinna should be recognized as a member of Delma (following current practice) until future studies clarify its placement inside or outside the Delma clade. One chronic problem with phylogenetic studies of pygopodids, which has limited the explanatory power of many tree hypotheses, concerns the undersampling of known species. Although the continual addition of newly described species, especially over the past two decades, has been a major reason for these taxon sampling gaps, deficits in species sampling for ingroups and/or outgroups in several studies of pygopodid species complexes has confounded the testing of some ingroup monophyly hypotheses. Ancient hybridization between non-sister lineages may also be confounding attempts to recover the relationships among pygopodids using molecular data. Indeed, such a phenomenon can explain at least five cases of mito-nuclear discordance and conflicts among trees based on nuclear DNA datasets. Another problem has been the lack of consensus on the relationships among most pygopodid genera, an issue that may stem from rapid diversification of these lineages early in the group's history. Despite current weaknesses in our understanding of pygopodid phylogeny, enough evidence exists to clarify many major and minor structural parts of their family tree. Accordingly, a composite tree for the Pygopodidae was able to be synthesized. This novel tree hypothesis contains all recognized pygopodid species and reveals that about half of the clades are corroborated by multiple independent tree hypotheses, while the remaining clades have less empirical support.

Project description:The woodrats or packrats of the genus Neotoma have been the subject of a wide array of research including paleoecology, physiology, morphological evolution, systematics, speciation, and hybridization. In recent years, much work has been done to elucidate evolutionary relationships within and between closely related species of the genus; in particular the addition of newly collected specimens from critical geographic regions has provided new opportunities for taxonomic assessment. Given these new data and their potential, parsimony (PARS), maximum likelihood (ML), and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses were conducted on DNA sequences obtained from nine individual genes (four mitochondrial loci: 12S, 16S, CoII, and Cytb; five nuclear loci: AdhI2, BfibI7, En2, Mlr, and Myh6) to estimate the phylogenetic relationships among 23 species of Neotoma. Results of these analyses depicted a wide array of phylogenetic relationships among taxa; with substantial nodal support recovered in both the ML and PARS analyses at some mid-level and terminal positions. Several individual genes, particularly 12S, AdhI2, BfibI7, CoII, and Cytb, provided support at several basal positions; however, phylogenetic resolution was limited in the other genes. A final BI analysis where the nine genes were concatenated into a single data set produced several supported clades that corresponded to previously recognized species groups (floridana, micropus, mexicana, and lepida) and the subgenus Homodontomys. Levels of genetic divergence for within-species comparisons (estimated from the Cytb data set) ranged from 0.88% (N. magister) to 6.82% (N. fuscipes); for between sister species comparisons ranged from 4.68% (N. devia and N. lepida) to 12.70% (N. angustapalata and N. nelsoni); and for members within closely related clades ranged from 8.70% (N. bryanti and N. lepida) to 12.57% (N. goldmani and N. magister). Evaluations of generic, subgeneric, and species group boundaries were explored using phylogenetic principles on the DNA sequence data presented herein, as well as morphological findings from previous studies. Results obtained suggest that the most conservative taxonomic interpretation involves the abandonment of subgeneric delineations and relies on the recognition of eight species groups (cinerea, floridana, fuscipes, lepida, mexicana, micropus, phenax, and stephensi) as the backbone of the woodrat classification.