Dataset Information

Significance analysis of prognostic signatures.

ABSTRACT: A major goal in translational cancer research is to identify biological signatures driving cancer progression and metastasis. A common technique applied in genomics research is to cluster patients using gene expression data from a candidate prognostic gene set, and if the resulting clusters show statistically significant outcome stratification, to associate the gene set with prognosis, suggesting its biological and clinical importance. Recent work has questioned the validity of this approach by showing in several breast cancer data sets that "random" gene sets tend to cluster patients into prognostically variable subgroups. This work suggests that new rigorous statistical methods are needed to identify biologically informative prognostic gene sets. To address this problem, we developed Significance Analysis of Prognostic Signatures (SAPS) which integrates standard prognostic tests with a new prognostic significance test based on stratifying patients into prognostic subtypes with random gene sets. SAPS ensures that a significant gene set is not only able to stratify patients into prognostically variable groups, but is also enriched for genes showing strong univariate associations with patient prognosis, and performs significantly better than random gene sets. We use SAPS to perform a large meta-analysis (the largest completed to date) of prognostic pathways in breast and ovarian cancer and their molecular subtypes. Our analyses show that only a small subset of the gene sets found statistically significant using standard measures achieve significance by SAPS. We identify new prognostic signatures in breast and ovarian cancer and their corresponding molecular subtypes, and we show that prognostic signatures in ER negative breast cancer are more similar to prognostic signatures in ovarian cancer than to prognostic signatures in ER positive breast cancer. SAPS is a powerful new method for deriving robust prognostic biological signatures from clinically annotated genomic datasets.

SUBMITTER: Beck AH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3554539 | biostudies-literature | 2013

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Significance analysis of prognostic signatures.

Beck Andrew H AH Knoblauch Nicholas W NW Hefti Marco M MM Kaplan Jennifer J Schnitt Stuart J SJ Culhane Aedin C AC Schroeder Markus S MS Risch Thomas T Quackenbush John J Haibe-Kains Benjamin B

PLoS computational biology 20130124 1

A major goal in translational cancer research is to identify biological signatures driving cancer progression and metastasis. A common technique applied in genomics research is to cluster patients using gene expression data from a candidate prognostic gene set, and if the resulting clusters show statistically significant outcome stratification, to associate the gene set with prognosis, suggesting its biological and clinical importance. Recent work has questioned the validity of this approach by ...[more]

PMID: 23365551

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Calcium signaling is implicated in multiple processes including immune response that important in tumor progression. Kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) is the most frequent histological type of renal cell carcinoma with up to a third of cases develop metastases. As a result of a lack of in-depth understanding of the mechanisms underlying KIRC, treatment options have been limited. Here, we aim to comprehensively investigate the landscape of Ca2+ channels, pumps and exchangers in KIRC patients. Methods: The mRNA expression profiles and gene variations of 58 calcium-related genes (CRGs) in KIRC patients and normal control cases were downloaded from TCGA database. CRGs-related risk score was constructed to quantify calcium patterns by using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. The prognostic value, biological functions, immune landscape and therapeutic sensitivities based on CRGs-related risk score were then evaluated using multiple methods. Finally, key gene of CRGs was identified by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). TCGA-CPTAC, GSE53757 datasets, as well as human tissues were used for validation. Results: KIRC patients had significant differences in CRG expression, prognosis, and biological functions between two CRG clusters. CRGs-related risk score was then determined. The prognosis, tumor mutation burden, immune cell infiltration, immune checkpoints, and the response of targeted inhibitors were remarkably different between high and low CRGs-related risk subtypes. CRGs-related high-risk subtype was characterized by immunosuppressive microenvironment with poor prognosis. Meanwhile, several targeted drugs showed distinct sensitivity between CRGs-related risk subtypes. Finally, TRPM3 was identified as a key CRG based on risk score in KIRC patients. TRPM3 mRNA and protein expression were significantly lower in KIRC tumors than in normal controls. Low TRPM3 expression was associated with poor prognosis in KIRC patients. Conclusion: Our study highlighted the promising prognostic value of CRGs in KIRC tumors. The evaluation of CRGs-related risk score will contribute to predicting prognosis and clinical therapy in KIRC patients.

Project description:Purpose: This study was conducted in order to analyze the prognostic effects of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and CDKN2A alterations and determine the prognostic significance of EGFR and CDKN2A alterations on regulated genes in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) or lower grade glioma (LGG). Methods: The alteration frequencies of EGFR and CDKN2A across 32 tumor types were derived from cBioPortal based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the prognostic significance of EGFR and CDKN2A alterations. EGFR and CDKN2A alterations on regulated expression signatures were identified from RNA-seq data in the TCGA GBM datasets. The prognostic significance of EGFR and CDKN2A alterations on regulated genes in patients with glioma was determined using the TCGA and the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) datasets. Results: Compared with the other 31 tumor types, EGFR amplification and CDKN2A deletion particularly occurred in patients with GBM. GBM patients with EGFR amplification or CDKN2A deletion demonstrated poor prognosis. Statistical analysis showed the coexistence of EGFR alteration and CDKN2A deletion in GBM patients. We identified 864 genes which were commonly regulated by EGFR amplification and CDKN2A deletion, and those genes were highly expressed in brain tissues and associated with the cell cycle, EBRR2, and MAPK signaling pathways. Spermatogenesis-associated serine-rich 2-like gene (SPATS2L) was upregulated in GBM patients with EGFR amplification or CDKN2A alteration. Higher expression levels of SPATS2L were associated with worse prognosis in patients with GBM in both TCGA and CGGA datasets. Moreover, the expression levels of SPATS2L were higher in patients with a mesenchymal subtype of GBM. Statistical analysis also showed that the coexistence of EGFR alteration and CDKN2A deletion was significant in patients with LGG. SPATS2L was upregulated in LGG patients with EGFR amplification or CDKN2A alteration. Furthermore, higher expression levels of SPATS2L were associated with worse prognosis in patients with LGG in both TCGA and CGGA datasets. The expression levels of SPATS2L were higher in patients with an astrocytoma subtype of LGG. Finally, the coexistence and unfavorable prognostic effects of EGFR amplification and CDKN2A alteration were validated using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) glioma datasets. Conclusions: EGFR amplification and CDKN2A deletion of the regulated gene SPATS2L have significant prognostic effects in patients with GBM or LGG.

Project description:Background: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is a highly heterogeneous tumor with substantial somatic mutations and genome instability, which are emerging hallmarks of cancer. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are promising cancer biomarkers that are reportedly involved in genomic instability. However, the identification of genome instability-related lncRNAs (GInLncRNAs) and their clinical significance has not been investigated in LUAD. Methods: We determined GInLncRNAs by combining somatic mutation and transcriptome data of 457 patients with LUAD and probed their potential function using co-expression network and Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analyses. We then filtered GInLncRNAs by Cox regression and LASSO regression to construct a genome instability-related lncRNA signature (GInLncSig). We subsequently evaluated GInLncSig using correlation analyses with mutations, external validation, model comparisons, independent prognostic significance analyses, and clinical stratification analyses. Finally, we established a nomogram for prognosis prediction in patients with LUAD and validated it in the testing set and the entire TCGA dataset. Results: We identified 161 GInLncRNAs, of which seven were screened to develop a prognostic GInLncSig model (LINC01133, LINC01116, LINC01671, FAM83A-AS1, PLAC4, MIR223HG, and AL590226.1). GInLncSig independently predicted the overall survival of patients with LUAD and displayed an improved performance compared to other similar signatures. Furthermore, GInLncSig was related to somatic mutation patterns, suggesting its ability to reflect genome instability in LUAD. Finally, a nomogram comprising the GInLncSig and tumor stage exhibited improved robustness and clinical practicability for predicting patient prognosis. Conclusion: Our study identified a signature for prognostic prediction in LUAD comprising seven lncRNAs associated with genome instability, which may provide a useful indicator for clinical stratification management and treatment decisions for patients with LUAD.

Dataset Information

Significance analysis of prognostic signatures.

Publications

Significance analysis of prognostic signatures.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets