Dataset Information

Thoracic ultrasonography: A new method for the work-up of patients with dyspnea().

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Differential diagnosis of dyspnea is vital for the management of respiratory failure, where routine parameters can now be integrated with thoracic ultrasound data. The objective of this study was to evaluate the validity and accuracy of this approach in a department of internal medicine.

Materials and methods

We enrolled 152 patients consecutively hospitalized with a diagnosis of dyspnea. After clinical evaluation, chest radiography, biochemical assays (NT-proBNP), and emergency treatment, patients underwent ultrasound examination of the lungs. Results were considered positive if the total number of lines B was higher than 8. The ultrasound examination and NT-proBNP assay were repeated after 48 h. The gold standard was the clinical diagnosis of heart failure made by medical experts in accordance with AHA guidelines.

Results

The group of patients with positive ultrasound findings had a higher frequency of heart failure diagnoses (X(2) 92.5, p < 0.005) and significantly higher values of NT-proBNP (10,384 ng/l vs 3889 ng/l, p < 0.05). Moreover, the decrease in the number of B lines at 48 h was significantly greater (p < 0.005) among patients treated for heart failure. There were no significant changes in the values of NT-proBNP (p = 0.37).

Discussion

In conclusion we have shown that even in a department of internal medicine, lung ultrasonography is a useful tool for diagnosing respiratory insufficiency and monitoring its response to therapy.

SUBMITTER: Vitturi N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3558237 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Thoracic ultrasonography: A new method for the work-up of patients with dyspnea().

Vitturi N N Soattin M M Allemand E E Simoni F F Realdi G G

Journal of ultrasound 20110630 3

<h4>Objective</h4>Differential diagnosis of dyspnea is vital for the management of respiratory failure, where routine parameters can now be integrated with thoracic ultrasound data. The objective of this study was to evaluate the validity and accuracy of this approach in a department of internal medicine.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>We enrolled 152 patients consecutively hospitalized with a diagnosis of dyspnea. After clinical evaluation, chest radiography, biochemical assays (NT-proBNP), and e ...[more]

PMID: 23396858

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Dyspnea is the hallmark symptom of pulmonary fibrosis. Supplemental oxygen (O2) is prescribed to many patients with pulmonary fibrosis in hopes of alleviating dyspnea and improving physical functioning. We used response data from the University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSD) which was administered monthly in the context of a longitudinal, observational study to plot a rich trajectory for dyspnea over time in patients with pulmonary fibrosis. We used other data from that study to identify clinical predictors of being prescribed O2 and to provide additional information for how UCSD scores could be used for clinical purposes. METHODS:We used linear mixed-effects models and multivariate Cox proportional hazards to model change in dyspnea scores over time and to identify significant predictors of time-to-O2-prescription among a pool of clinically-meaningful candidate variables. In the longitudinal study, all decisions, including whether or not to prescribe O2, were made by subjects' treating physicians, not members of the research team. RESULTS:One-hundred ninety-four subjects with pulmonary fibrosis completed more than one UCSD or were prescribed O2 at some point during the follow-up period (N?=?43). Twenty-eight of the 43 had analyzable, longitudinal data and contribute data to the longitudinal UCSD analyses. All 43 were included in the time-to-O2-prescription analyses. Subjects prescribed O2 had more severe dyspnea at enrollment (38.4?±?19.6 vs. 22.6?±?18.7, p?<?0.0001) and a steeper increase in UCSD scores over time (slope?=?1.18?±?0.53 vs. 0.24?±?0.09 points per month, p?=?0.02) than subjects not prescribed O2. Controlling for baseline UCSD score and FVC%, subjects with a clinical summary diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) were far more likely to be prescribed O2 than subjects with other forms of pulmonary fibrosis (hazard ratio?=?4.85, (2.19, 10.74), p?<?0.0001). CONCLUSIONS:Baseline dyspnea and rise in dyspnea over time predict timing of O2 prescription. Accounting for disease severity, patients with IPF are more likely than patients with other forms of pulmonary fibrosis to be prescribed O2. UCSD scores provide clinically useful information; frequent administration could yield timely data on changes in disease status in patients with pulmonary fibrosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION:The longitudinal study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT01961362 ). Registered October 9, 2013.

Project description:The goal of this study was to examine the ability of emergency physicians who are not experts in emergency ultrasound (US) to perform lung ultrasonography and to identify B-lines. The hypothesis was that novice sonographers are able to perform lung US and identify B-lines after a brief intervention. In addition, the authors examined the diagnostic accuracy of B-lines in undifferentiated dyspneic patients for the diagnosis of acute heart failure syndrome (AHFS), using an eight-lung-zone technique as well as an abbreviated two-lung-zone technique.This was a prospective, cross-sectional study of patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with acute dyspnea from May 2009 to June 2010. Emergency medicine (EM) resident physicians, who received a 30-minute training course in thoracic US examinations, performed lung ultrasonography on patients presenting to the ED with undifferentiated dyspnea. They attempted to identify the presence or absence of sonographic B-lines in eight lung fields based on their bedside US examinations. An emergency US expert blinded to the diagnosis and patient presentation, as well as to the residents' interpretations of presence of B-lines, served as the criterion standard. A secondary outcome determined the accuracy of B-lines, using both an eight-lung-zone and a two-lung-zone technique, for predicting pulmonary edema from AHFS in patients presenting with undifferentiated dyspnea. Two expert reviewers who were blinded to the US results determined the clinical diagnosis of AHFS.A cohort of 66 EM resident physicians performed lung US on 380 patients with a range of 1 to 28 examinations, a mean of 5.8 examinations, and a median of three examinations performed per resident. Compared to expert interpretation, lung US to detect B-lines by inexperienced sonographers achieved the following test characteristics: sensitivity 85%, specificity 84%, positive likelihood ratio (+LR) 5.2, negative likelihood ratio (-LR) 0.2, positive predictive value (PPV) 64%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 94%. Regarding the secondary outcome, the final diagnosis was AHFS in 35% of patients (134 of 380). For novice sonographers, one positive lung zone (i.e., anything positive) had a sensitivity of 87%, a specificity of 49%, a +LR of 1.7, a -LR of 0.3, a PPV of 50%, and an NPV of 88% for predicting AHFS. When all eight lung zones were determined positive (i.e., totally positive) by novice sonographers, the sensitivity was 19%, specificity was 97%, +LR was 5.7, -LR was 0.8, PPV was 76%, and NPV was 68% for predicting AHFS. The areas under the curve for novice and expert sonographers were 0.77 (95% CI = 0.72 to 0.82) and 0.76 (95% CI = 0.71 to 0.82), respectively.Novice sonographers can identify sonographic B-lines with similar accuracy compared to an expert sonographer. Lung US has fair predictive value for pulmonary edema from acute heart failure in the hands of both novice and expert sonographers.

Project description:IntroductionIdiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP) remains a dilemma for physicians as it is uncertain whether patients with IAP may actually have an occult aetiology. It is unclear to what extent additional diagnostic modalities such as endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) are warranted after a first episode of IAP in order to uncover this aetiology. Failure to timely determine treatable aetiologies delays appropriate treatment and might subsequently cause recurrence of acute pancreatitis. Therefore, the aim of the Pancreatitis of Idiopathic origin: Clinical added value of endoscopic UltraSonography (PICUS) Study is to determine the value of routine EUS in determining the aetiology of pancreatitis in patients with a first episode of IAP.Methods and analysisPICUS is designed as a multicentre prospective cohort study of 106 patients with a first episode of IAP after complete standard diagnostic work-up, in whom a diagnostic EUS will be performed. Standard diagnostic work-up will include a complete personal and family history, laboratory tests including serum alanine aminotransferase, calcium and triglyceride levels and imaging by transabdominal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography after clinical recovery from the acute pancreatitis episode. The primary outcome measure is detection of aetiology by EUS. Secondary outcome measures include pancreatitis recurrence rate, severity of recurrent pancreatitis, readmission, additional interventions, complications, length of hospital stay, quality of life, mortality and costs, during a follow-up period of 12 months.Ethics and disseminationPICUS is conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. Five medical ethics review committees assessed PICUS (Medical Ethics Review Committee of Academic Medical Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Radboud University Medical Center, Erasmus Medical Center and Maastricht University Medical Center). The results will be submitted for publication in an international peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberNetherlands Trial Registry (NL7066). Prospectively registered.

Dataset Information

Thoracic ultrasonography: A new method for the work-up of patients with dyspnea().

Objective

Materials and methods

Results

Discussion

Publications

Thoracic ultrasonography: A new method for the work-up of patients with dyspnea().

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets