Dataset Information

Discordance between liver biopsy and FibroTest in assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B.

ABSTRACT:

Background and aims

The FibroTest (FT) demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance in the prediction of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Here, we aimed to identify predictors of discordance between FT and liver biopsy (LB) in Asian patients with CHB.

Methods

Consecutive patients with CHB who underwent both LB and FT on the same day between 2007 and 2010 were recruited from three medical institutes. Laboratory evaluations including specific parameters for calculating FT score, such as ?2-macroglobulin, apolipoprotein A1, haptoglobin, ?-glutamyl transpeptidase, and total bilirubin levels, were obtained. The Batts and Ludwig scoring system was used for histological analysis.

Results

A total of 330 patients (200 male and 130 female) were analyzed. Discordances of at least two fibrosis stages between FT and LB were observed in 30 (9.1%) patients; using FT, fibrosis was underestimated in 25 patients and overestimated in 5 patients with reference to LB. Patients with discordance had a higher proportion of F3-4 (P<0.001) and F4 (P?=?0.012) compared with those with nondiscordance. The discordance rate was significantly higher in those with F3-4 than those with F1-2 (15.4% vs. 3.0%, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated F3-4 at LB as the only independent factor for discordance (P<0.001; odds ratio 5.95). After adjusting fibrosis stages, neither necroinflammatory activity on histology nor serum ALT level influenced FT values independently.

Conclusion

Advanced fibrosis stage (F3-4) is the sole factor of discordance between FT and LB in Asian patients with CHB.

SUBMITTER: Park MS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3566034 | biostudies-literature | 2013

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Discordance between liver biopsy and FibroTest in assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B.

Park Mi Sung MS Kim Beom Kyung BK Cheong Jae Yoeun JY Kim Dong Joon DJ Park Jun Yong JY Kim Do Young DY Ahn Sang Hoon SH Han Kwang-Hyub KH Chon Chae Yoon CY Kim Seung Up SU

PloS one 20130206 2

<h4>Background and aims</h4>The FibroTest (FT) demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance in the prediction of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Here, we aimed to identify predictors of discordance between FT and liver biopsy (LB) in Asian patients with CHB.<h4>Methods</h4>Consecutive patients with CHB who underwent both LB and FT on the same day between 2007 and 2010 were recruited from three medical institutes. Laboratory evaluations including specific parameters fo ...[more]

PMID: 23405210

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundNon-invasive tests have been constructed and evaluated mainly for binary diagnoses such as significant fibrosis. Recently, detailed fibrosis classifications for several non-invasive tests have been developed, but their accuracy has not been thoroughly evaluated in comparison to liver biopsy, especially in clinical practice and for Fibroscan. Therefore, the main aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of detailed fibrosis classifications available for non-invasive tests and liver biopsy. The secondary aim was to validate these accuracies in independent populations.MethodsFour HCV populations provided 2,068 patients with liver biopsy, four different pathologist skill-levels and non-invasive tests. Results were expressed as percentages of correctly classified patients.ResultsIn population #1 including 205 patients and comparing liver biopsy (reference: consensus reading by two experts) and blood tests, Metavir fibrosis (FM) stage accuracy was 64.4% in local pathologists vs. 82.2% (p < 10-3) in single expert pathologist. Significant discrepancy (? 2FM vs reference histological result) rates were: Fibrotest: 17.2%, FibroMeter2G: 5.6%, local pathologists: 4.9%, FibroMeter3G: 0.5%, expert pathologist: 0% (p < 10-3). In population #2 including 1,056 patients and comparing blood tests, the discrepancy scores, taking into account the error magnitude, of detailed fibrosis classification were significantly different between FibroMeter2G (0.30 ± 0.55) and FibroMeter3G (0.14 ± 0.37, p < 10-3) or Fibrotest (0.84 ± 0.80, p < 10-3). In population #3 (and #4) including 458 (359) patients and comparing blood tests and Fibroscan, accuracies of detailed fibrosis classification were, respectively: Fibrotest: 42.5% (33.5%), Fibroscan: 64.9% (50.7%), FibroMeter2G: 68.7% (68.2%), FibroMeter3G: 77.1% (83.4%), p < 10-3 (p < 10-3). Significant discrepancy (? 2 FM) rates were, respectively: Fibrotest: 21.3% (22.2%), Fibroscan: 12.9% (12.3%), FibroMeter2G: 5.7% (6.0%), FibroMeter3G: 0.9% (0.9%), p < 10-3 (p < 10-3).ConclusionsThe accuracy in detailed fibrosis classification of the best-performing blood test outperforms liver biopsy read by a local pathologist, i.e., in clinical practice; however, the classification precision is apparently lesser. This detailed classification accuracy is much lower than that of significant fibrosis with Fibroscan and even Fibrotest but higher with FibroMeter3G. FibroMeter classification accuracy was significantly higher than those of other non-invasive tests. Finally, for hepatitis C evaluation in clinical practice, fibrosis degree can be evaluated using an accurate blood test.

Project description:Few studies have compared the distinct hepatic collagen morphometrics of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and chronic hepatitis C (CHC). This study compared the discrepancies between CHB and CHC in liver fibrosis (F) quantification by using the collagen proportionate area (CPA) and liver stiffness (LS) measured with shear wave velocity (SWV).This study enrolled 274 eligible consecutive patients diagnosed with CHB (n?=?137) or CHC (n?=?137). Their ages ranged from 20 to 80 years (median?=?50). In total, 154 patients (56.2%) were male. Participant LS was measured by using acoustic radiation force impulse elastography preceding an immediate percutaneous liver biopsy. The total proportion of the collagen stained with picrosirius red to the total tissue area was expressed as the CPA percentage, which was stratified into portal-bridging (PB) and perisinusoidal (PS) proportionate areas (PAs).Based on the METAVIR F staging system, 36 (26.3%), 36 (26.3%), 28 (20.4%), and 37 (27.0%) participants in the CHB group and 34 (24.8%), 45 (32.9%), 34 (24.8%), and 24 (17.5%) participants in the CHC group were staged as F1, F2, F3, and F4, respectively. Both the total CPAs and PBPAs were significantly (P?<?0.05) higher in the CHC group than in the CHB group within all F-stratified subgroups. The SWVs were significantly (P?<?0.05) higher in the CHC group than in the CHB group only within the F2, F3, and F4 subgroups. However, the PSPAs did not differ significantly between the CHC and CHB groups within all subgroups. Multiple regression analysis revealed that viral hepatitis etiology (P?<?0.001), METAVIR F stages (P?<?0.001), and platelet count (P?=?0.007) were independent factors correlated with the CPA (R?=?0.543, P?<?0.001).In conclusion, both the F stage-stratified CPAs and SWVs tended to be higher in cases of CHC than in those of CHB. The type of viral hepatitis significantly affected both the CPA and SWV values. The PBPAs were more closely correlated with F stages and SWV than were the PSPAs.

Dataset Information

Discordance between liver biopsy and FibroTest in assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B.

Background and aims

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Discordance between liver biopsy and FibroTest in assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure