Whole-genome regression and prediction methods applied to plant and animal breeding.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: de Los Campos G
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3567727 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Whole-genome regression and prediction methods applied to plant and animal breeding.
de Los Campos Gustavo G Hickey John M JM Pong-Wong Ricardo R Daetwyler Hans D HD Calus Mario P L MP
Genetics 20120628 2
Genomic-enabled prediction is becoming increasingly important in animal and plant breeding and is also receiving attention in human genetics. Deriving accurate predictions of complex traits requires implementing whole-genome regression (WGR) models where phenotypes are regressed on thousands of markers concurrently. Methods exist that allow implementing these large-p with small-n regressions, and genome-enabled selection (GS) is being implemented in several plant and animal breeding programs. Th ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:The advent of modern genotyping technologies has revolutionized genomic selection in animal breeding. Large marker datasets have shown several drawbacks for traditional genomic prediction methods in terms of flexibility, accuracy, and computational power. Recently, the application of machine learning models in animal breeding has gained a lot of interest due to their tremendous flexibility and their ability to capture patterns in large noisy datasets. Here, we present a general overview of a handful of machine learning algorithms and their application in genomic prediction to provide a meta-picture of their performance in genomic estimated breeding values estimation, genotype imputation, and feature selection. Finally, we discuss a potential adoption of machine learning models in genomic prediction in developing countries. The results of the reviewed studies showed that machine learning models have indeed performed well in fitting large noisy data sets and modeling minor nonadditive effects in some of the studies. However, sometimes conventional methods outperformed machine learning models, which confirms that there's no universal method for genomic prediction. In summary, machine learning models have great potential for extracting patterns from single nucleotide polymorphism datasets. Nonetheless, the level of their adoption in animal breeding is still low due to data limitations, complex genetic interactions, a lack of standardization and reproducibility, and the lack of interpretability of machine learning models when trained with biological data. Consequently, there is no remarkable outperformance of machine learning methods compared to traditional methods in genomic prediction. Therefore, more research should be conducted to discover new insights that could enhance livestock breeding programs.
| S-EPMC10516561 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Efficient plant breeding methods must be developed in order to increase yields and feed a growing world population, as well as to meet the demands of consumers with diverse preferences who require high-quality foods. We propose a strategy that integrates breeding simulations and phenotype prediction models using genomic information. The validity of this strategy was evaluated by the simultaneous genetic improvement of the yield and flavour of the tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), as an example. Reliable phenotype prediction models for the simulation were constructed from actual genotype and phenotype data. Our simulation predicted that selection for both yield and flavour would eventually result in morphological changes that would increase the total plant biomass and decrease the light extinction coefficient, an essential requirement for these improvements. This simulation-based genome-assisted approach to breeding will help to optimise plant breeding, not only in the tomato but also in other important agricultural crops.
| S-EPMC4726135 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Blueberry (Vaccinium spp.) is an important autopolyploid crop with significant benefits for human health. Apart from its genetic complexity, the feasibility of genomic prediction has been proven for blueberry, enabling a reduction in the breeding cycle time and increasing genetic gain. However, as for other polyploid crops, sequencing costs still hinder the implementation of genome-based breeding methods for blueberry. This motivated us to evaluate the effect of training population sizes and composition, as well as the impact of marker density and sequencing depth on phenotype prediction for the species. For this, data from a large real breeding population of 1804 individuals were used. Genotypic data from 86,930 markers and three traits with different genetic architecture (fruit firmness, fruit weight, and total yield) were evaluated. Herein, we suggested that marker density, sequencing depth, and training population size can be substantially reduced with no significant impact on model accuracy. Our results can help guide decisions toward resource allocation (e.g., genotyping and phenotyping) in order to maximize prediction accuracy. These findings have the potential to allow for a faster and more accurate release of varieties with a substantial reduction of resources for the application of genomic prediction in blueberry. We anticipate that the benefits and pipeline described in our study can be applied to optimize genomic prediction for other diploid and polyploid species.
| S-EPMC7784927 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Plant breeding populations exhibit varying levels of structure and admixture; these features are likely to induce heterogeneity of marker effects across subpopulations. Traditionally, structure has been dealt with as a potential confounder, and various methods exist to "correct" for population stratification. However, these methods induce a mean correction that does not account for heterogeneity of marker effects. The animal breeding literature offers a few recent studies that consider modeling genetic heterogeneity in multibreed data, using multivariate models. However, these methods have received little attention in plant breeding where population structure can have different forms. In this article we address the problem of analyzing data from heterogeneous plant breeding populations, using three approaches: (a) a model that ignores population structure [A-genome-based best linear unbiased prediction (A-GBLUP)], (b) a stratified (i.e., within-group) analysis (W-GBLUP), and (c) a multivariate approach that uses multigroup data and accounts for heterogeneity (MG-GBLUP). The performance of the three models was assessed on three different data sets: a diversity panel of rice (Oryza sativa), a maize (Zea mays L.) half-sib panel, and a wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) data set that originated from plant breeding programs. The estimated genomic correlations between subpopulations varied from null to moderate, depending on the genetic distance between subpopulations and traits. Our assessment of prediction accuracy features cases where ignoring population structure leads to a parsimonious more powerful model as well as others where the multivariate and stratified approaches have higher predictive power. In general, the multivariate approach appeared slightly more robust than either the A- or the W-GBLUP.
| S-EPMC4566272 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND: The structural genomics centers provide hundreds of protein structures of unknown function. Therefore, developing methods enabling the determination of a protein function automatically is imperative. The determination of a protein function can be achieved by studying the network of its physical interactions. In this context, identifying a potential binding site between proteins is of primary interest. In the literature, methods for predicting a potential binding site location generally are based on classification tools. The aim of this paper is to show that regression tools are more efficient than classification tools for patches based binding site predictors. For this purpose, we developed a patches based binding site localization method usable with either regression or classification tools. RESULTS: We compared predictive performances of regression tools with performances of machine learning classifiers. Using leave-one-out cross-validation, we showed that regression tools provide better predictions than classification ones. Among regression tools, Multilayer Perceptron ranked highest in the quality of predictions. We compared also the predictive performance of our patches based method using Multilayer Perceptron with the performance of three other methods usable through a web server. Our method performed similarly to the other methods. CONCLUSION: Regression is more efficient than classification when applied to our binding site localization method. When it is possible, using regression instead of classification for other existing binding site predictors will probably improve results. Furthermore, the method presented in this work is flexible because the size of the predicted binding site is adjustable. This adaptability is useful when either false positive or negative rates have to be limited.
| S-EPMC2749839 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionThe frequently used Cox regression applies two critical assumptions, which might not hold for all predictors. In this study, the results from a Cox regression model (CM) and a generalized Cox regression model (GCM) are compared.MethodsData are from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), which includes approximately 140,000 individuals aged 50 or older followed over seven waves. CMs and GCMs are used to estimate dementia risk. The results are internally and externally validated.ResultsNone of the predictors included in the analyses fulfilled the assumptions of Cox regression. Both models predict dementia moderately well (10-year risk: 0.737; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.699, 0.773; CM and 0.746; 95% CI: 0.710, 0.785; GCM).DiscussionThe GCM performs significantly better than the CM when comparing pseudo-R2 and the log-likelihood. GCMs enable researcher to test the assumptions used by Cox regression independently and relax these assumptions if necessary.
| S-EPMC7293996 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Training set size is an important determinant of genomic prediction accuracy. Plant breeding programs are characterized by a high degree of structuring, particularly into populations. This hampers the establishment of large training sets for each population. Pooling populations increases training set size but ignores unique genetic characteristics of each. A possible solution is partial pooling with multilevel models, which allows estimating population-specific marker effects while still leveraging information across populations. We developed a Bayesian multilevel whole-genome regression model and compared its performance with that of the popular BayesA model applied to each population separately (no pooling) and to the joined data set (complete pooling). As an example, we analyzed a wide array of traits from the nested association mapping maize population. There we show that for small population sizes (e.g., <50), partial pooling increased prediction accuracy over no or complete pooling for populations represented in the training set. No pooling was superior; however, when populations were large. In another example data set of interconnected biparental maize populations either partial or complete pooling was superior, depending on the trait. A simulation showed that no pooling is superior when differences in genetic effects among populations are large and partial pooling when they are intermediate. With small differences, partial and complete pooling achieved equally high accuracy. For prediction of new populations, partial and complete pooling had very similar accuracy in all cases. We conclude that partial pooling with multilevel models can maximize the potential of pooling by making optimal use of information in pooled training sets.
| S-EPMC4528317 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Large-scale phenotype data are expected to increase the accuracy of genome-wide prediction and the power of genome-wide association analyses. However, genomic analyses of high-dimensional, highly correlated traits are challenging. We developed a method for implementing high-dimensional Bayesian multivariate regression to simultaneously analyze genetic variants underlying thousands of traits. As a demonstration, we implemented the BayesC prior in the R package MegaLMM. Applied to Genomic Prediction, MegaBayesC effectively integrated hyperspectral reflectance data from 620 hyperspectral wavelengths to improve the accuracy of genetic value prediction on grain yield in a wheat dataset. Applied to Genome-Wide Association Studies, we used simulations to show that MegaBayesC can accurately estimate the effect sizes of QTL across a range of genetic architectures and causes of correlations among traits. To apply MegaBayesC to a realistic scenario involving whole-genome marker data, we developed a 2-stage procedure involving a preliminary step of candidate marker selection prior to multivariate regression. We then used MegaBayesC to identify genetic associations with flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana, leveraging expression data from 20,843 genes. MegaBayesC selected 15 single nucleotide polymorphisms as important for flowering time, with 13 located within 100 kb of known flowering-time related genes, a higher validation rate than achieved by a single-stage analysis using only the flowering time data itself. These results demonstrate that MegaBayesC can efficiently and effectively leverage high-dimensional phenotypes in genetic analyses.
| S-EPMC9991502 | biostudies-literature
Project description:While sparse testing methods have been proposed by researchers to improve the efficiency of genomic selection (GS) in breeding programs, there are several factors that can hinder this. In this research, we evaluated four methods (M1-M4) for sparse testing allocation of lines to environments under multi-environmental trails for genomic prediction of unobserved lines. The sparse testing methods described in this study are applied in a two-stage analysis to build the genomic training and testing sets in a strategy that allows each location or environment to evaluate only a subset of all genotypes rather than all of them. To ensure a valid implementation, the sparse testing methods presented here require BLUEs (or BLUPs) of the lines to be computed at the first stage using an appropriate experimental design and statistical analyses in each location (or environment). The evaluation of the four cultivar allocation methods to environments of the second stage was done with four data sets (two large and two small) under a multi-trait and uni-trait framework. We found that the multi-trait model produced better genomic prediction (GP) accuracy than the uni-trait model and that methods M3 and M4 were slightly better than methods M1 and M2 for the allocation of lines to environments. Some of the most important findings, however, were that even under a scenario where we used a training-testing relation of 15-85%, the prediction accuracy of the four methods barely decreased. This indicates that genomic sparse testing methods for data sets under these scenarios can save considerable operational and financial resources with only a small loss in precision, which can be shown in our cost-benefit analysis.
| S-EPMC10137724 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Reliable and high-throughput genotyping platforms are of immense importance for identifying and dissecting genomic regions controlling important phenotypes, supporting selection processes in breeding programs, and managing wild populations and germplasm collections. Amongst available genotyping tools, single nucleotide polymorphism arrays have been shown to be comparatively easy to use and generate highly accurate genotypic data. Single-species arrays are the most commonly used type so far; however, some multi-species arrays have been developed for closely related species that share single nucleotide polymorphism markers, exploiting inter-species cross-amplification. In this study, the suitability of a multiplexed plant-animal single nucleotide polymorphism array, including both closely and distantly related species, was explored. The performance of the single nucleotide polymorphism array across species for diverse applications, ranging from intra-species diversity assessments to parentage analysis, was assessed. Moreover, the value of genotyping pooled DNA of distantly related species on the single nucleotide polymorphism array as a technique to further reduce costs was evaluated. Single nucleotide polymorphism performance was generally high, and species-specific single nucleotide polymorphisms proved suitable for diverse applications. The multi-species single nucleotide polymorphism array approach reported here could be transferred to other species to achieve cost savings resulting from the increased throughput when several projects use the same array, and the pooling technique adds another highly promising advancement to additionally decrease genotyping costs by half.
| S-EPMC10542201 | biostudies-literature