Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Comparing marginal structural models to standard methods for estimating treatment effects of antihypertensive combination therapy.


ABSTRACT: Due to time-dependent confounding by blood pressure and differential loss to follow-up, it is difficult to estimate the effectiveness of aggressive versus conventional antihypertensive combination therapies in non-randomized comparisons.We utilized data from 22,576 hypertensive coronary artery disease patients, prospectively enrolled in the INternational VErapamil-Trandolapril STudy (INVEST). Our post-hoc analyses did not consider the randomized treatment strategies, but instead defined exposure time-dependently as aggressive treatment (?3 concomitantly used antihypertensive medications) versus conventional treatment (?2 concomitantly used antihypertensive medications). Study outcome was defined as time to first serious cardiovascular event (non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or all-cause death). We compared hazard ratio (HR) estimates for aggressive vs. conventional treatment from a Marginal Structural Cox Model (MSCM) to estimates from a standard Cox model. Both models included exposure to antihypertensive treatment at each follow-up visit, demographics, and baseline cardiovascular risk factors, including blood pressure. The MSCM further adjusted for systolic blood pressure at each follow-up visit, through inverse probability of treatment weights.2,269 (10.1%) patients experienced a cardiovascular event over a total follow-up of 60,939 person-years. The HR for aggressive treatment estimated by the standard Cox model was 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.87-1.07). The equivalent MSCM, which was able to account for changes in systolic blood pressure during follow-up, estimated a HR of 0.81 (95% CI 0.71-0.92).Using a MSCM, aggressive treatment was associated with a lower risk for serious cardiovascular outcomes compared to conventional treatment. In contrast, a standard Cox model estimated similar risks for aggressive and conventional treatments.Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00133692.

SUBMITTER: Gerhard T 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3573973 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Comparing marginal structural models to standard methods for estimating treatment effects of antihypertensive combination therapy.

Gerhard Tobias T   Delaney Joseph Ac JA   Cooper-Dehoff Rhonda M RM   Shuster Jonathan J   Brumback Babette A BA   Johnson Julie A JA   Pepine Carl J CJ   Winterstein Almut G AG  

BMC medical research methodology 20120806


<h4>Background</h4>Due to time-dependent confounding by blood pressure and differential loss to follow-up, it is difficult to estimate the effectiveness of aggressive versus conventional antihypertensive combination therapies in non-randomized comparisons.<h4>Methods</h4>We utilized data from 22,576 hypertensive coronary artery disease patients, prospectively enrolled in the INternational VErapamil-Trandolapril STudy (INVEST). Our post-hoc analyses did not consider the randomized treatment strat  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7360419 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7270726 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8631064 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2877448 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4820319 | biostudies-literature