Patient sharing among physicians and costs of care: a network analytic approach to care coordination using claims data.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Improving care coordination is a national priority and a key focus of health care reforms. However, its measurement and ultimate achievement is challenging.Objective
To test whether patients whose providers frequently share patients with one another-what we term 'care density'-tend to have lower costs of care and likelihood of hospitalization.Design
Cohort studyParticipants
9,596 patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and 52,688 with diabetes who received care during 2009. Patients were enrolled in five large, private insurance plans across the US covering employer-sponsored and Medicare Advantage enrolleesMain measures
Costs of care, rates of hospitalizationsKey results
The average total annual health care cost for patients with CHF was $29,456, and $14,921 for those with diabetes. In risk adjusted analyses, patients with the highest tertile of care density, indicating the highest level of overlap among a patient's providers, had lower total costs compared to patients in the lowest tertile ($3,310 lower for CHF and $1,502 lower for diabetes, p < 0.001). Lower inpatient costs and rates of hospitalization were found for patients with CHF and diabetes with the highest care density. Additionally, lower outpatient costs and higher pharmacy costs were found for patients with diabetes with the highest care density.Conclusion
Patients treated by sets of physicians who share high numbers of patients tend to have lower costs. Future work is necessary to validate care density as a tool to evaluate care coordination and track the performance of health care systems.
SUBMITTER: Pollack CE
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3579968 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:With the goal of improving clinical efficiency and effectiveness, programs to enhance care coordination are a major focus of health care reform.To examine whether "care density"--a claims-based measure of patient sharing by office-based physicians--is associated with measures of quality. Care density is a proxy measure that may reflect how frequently a patient's doctors collaborate.Cohort study using administrative databases from 3 large commercial insurance plans.A total of 1.7 million adult patients; 31,675 with congestive heart failure, 78,530 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 240,378 with diabetes.Care density was assessed in 2008. Prevention Quality Indicators (PQIs), 30-day readmissions, and Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set quality indicators were measured in the following year.Among all patients, we found that patients with the highest care density density--indicating high levels of patient sharing among their office-based physicians--had significantly lower rates of adverse events measured as PQIs compared with patients with low-care density (odds ratio=0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-0.92). A significant association between care density and PQIs was also observed for patients with diabetes mellitus but not congestive heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Diabetic patients with higher care density scores had significantly lower odds of 30-day readmissions (odds ratio=0.68, 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.97). Significant associations were observed between care density and Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set measures although not always in the expected direction.In some settings, patients whose doctors share more patients had lower odds of adverse events and 30-day readmissions.
| S-EPMC4384684 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundEffective care coordination may increase clinical efficiency, but its measurement remains difficult. The established metric "care density" (CD) measures care coordination based on patient-sharing among physicians, but it may be too rigid to generalize across disorders and countries. Therefore, we propose an extension called fragmented care density (FCD), which allows varying weights for connections between different types of providers. We compare both metrics in their ability to predict hospitalizations due to schizophrenia.MethodsWe conducted a longitudinal cohort study based on German claims data from 2014 through 2017 to predict quarterly hospital admissions. 21,016 patients with schizophrenia from the federal state Baden-Württemberg were included. CD and FCD were calculated based on patient-sharing networks. The weights of FCD were optimized to predict hospital admissions during the first year of a 24-month follow-up. Subsequently, we employed likelihood ratio tests to assess whether adding either CD or FCD improved a baseline model with control variables for the second follow-up year.ResultsThe inclusion of FCD significantly improved the baseline model, Χ2(1) = 53.30, p < 0.001. We found that patients with lower percentiles in FCD had an up to 21% lower hospitalization risk than those with median or higher values, whereas CD did not affect the risk.ConclusionsFCD is an adaptive metric that can weight provider relationships based on their relevance for predicting any outcome. We used it to better understand which medical specialties need to be involved to reduce hospitalization risk for patients with schizophrenia. As FCD can be modified for different health conditions and systems, it is broadly applicable and might help to identify barriers and promoting factors for effective collaboration.
| S-EPMC10762822 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Study questionWhile physician relationships (measured through shared patients) are associated with clinical and utilization outcomes, the extent to which this is driven by local or global network characteristics is not well established. The objective of this research is to examine the association between local and global network statistics with total medical spending and utilization.Data sourceData used are the 2011 Massachusetts All Payer Claims Database.Study designThe association between network statistics and total medical spending and utilization (using standardized prices) is estimated using multivariate regression analysis controlling for patient demographics and health status.Data collectionWe limit the sample to continuously enrolled commercially insured patients in Massachusetts in 2011.Principal findingsMean patient age was 45 years, and 56.3% of patients were female. 73.4% were covered by a health maintenance organization. Average number of visits was 5.43, with average total medical spending of $4,911 and total medical utilization of $4,252. Spending was lower for patients treated by physicians with higher degree (p<0.001), eigenvector centrality (p<0.001), clustering coefficient (p<0.001), and measures reflecting the normalized degree (p<0.001) and eigenvector centrality (p<0.001) of specialists connected to a patient's PCP. Spending was higher for patients treated by physicians with higher normalized degree, which accounts for physician specialty and patient panel size (p<0.001). Results were similar for utilization outcomes, although magnitudes differed indicating patients may see different priced physicians.ConclusionsGenerally, higher values of network statistics reflecting local connectivity adjusted for physician characteristics are associated with increased costs and utilization, while higher values of network statistics reflecting global connectivity are associated with decreased costs and utilization. As changes in the financing and delivery system advance through policy changes and healthcare consolidation, future research should examine mechanisms through which this structure impacts outcomes and potential policy responses to determine ways to reduce costs while maintaining quality and coordination of care.What this study addsIt is unknown whether local and global measures of physician network connectivity associated with spending and utilization for commercially insured patients?In this social network analysis, we found generally higher values of network statistics reflecting local connectivity are associated with increased costs and utilization, while higher values of network statistics reflecting global connectivity are associated with decreased costs and utilization.Understanding how to influence local and global physician network characteristics may be important for reducing costs while maintaining quality.
| S-EPMC7307780 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Tools to measure care coordination are needed to evaluate federal, state, and private sector efforts encouraging coordination to improve health outcomes and contain costs. Administrative data are a rich source of data for studying the use of medical services, thus allowing for measurement of patient level, provider level, and system measures of care coordination. Based on a review the literature and input from an expert panel, this article describes 4 key components-building blocks-of care coordination and corresponding measures. These building blocks should have utility across clinical conditions. They may be used to test hypotheses about the impact of coordinated care on medication utilization, adherence to medications, and clinical outcomes.
| S-EPMC4532896 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMeaningful variations in physician performance are not always discernible from the medical record.ObjectiveWe used unannounced standardized patients to measure and provide feedback on care quality and fidelity of documentation, and examined downstream effects on reimbursement claims.DesignStatic group pre-post comparison study conducted between 2017 and 2019.SettingFourteen New Jersey primary care practice groups (22 practices) enrolled in Horizon BCBS's value-based program received the intervention. For claims analyses, we identified 14 additional comparison practice groups matched on county, practice size, and claims activity.ParticipantsFifty-nine of 64 providers volunteered to participate.InterventionUnannounced standardized patients (USPs) made 217 visits portraying patients with 1-2 focal conditions (diabetes, depression, back pain, smoking, or preventive cancer screening). After two baseline visits to a provider, we delivered feedback and conducted two follow-up visits.MeasurementsUSP-completed checklists of guideline-based provider care behaviors, visit audio recordings, and provider notes were used to measure behaviors performed and documentation errors pre- and post-feedback. We also compared changes in 3-month office-based claims by actual patients between the intervention and comparison practice groups before and after feedback.ResultsExpected clinical behaviors increased from 46% to 56% (OR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.29-1.83, p < 0.0001), with significant improvements in smoking cessation, back pain, and depression screening. Providers were less likely to document unperformed tasks after (16%) than before feedback (18%; OR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.90, p = 0.002). Actual claim costs increased significantly less in the study than comparison group for diabetes and depression but significantly more for smoking cessation, cancer screening, and low back pain.LimitationsSelf-selection of participating practices and lack of access to prescription claims.ConclusionDirect observation of care identifies hidden deficits in practice and documentation, and with feedback can improve both, with concomitant effects on costs.
| S-EPMC7859004 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportancePhysicians' views about health care costs are germane to pending policy reforms.ObjectiveTo assess physicians' attitudes toward and perceived role in addressing health care costs.Design, setting, and participantsA cross-sectional survey mailed in 2012 to 3897 US physicians randomly selected from the AMA Masterfile.Main outcomes and measuresEnthusiasm for 17 cost-containment strategies and agreement with an 11-measure cost-consciousness scale.ResultsA total of 2556 physicians responded (response rate = 65%). Most believed that trial lawyers (60%), health insurance companies (59%), hospitals and health systems (56%), pharmaceutical and device manufacturers (56%), and patients (52%) have a "major responsibility" for reducing health care costs, whereas only 36% reported that practicing physicians have "major responsibility." Most were "very enthusiastic" for "promoting continuity of care" (75%), "expanding access to quality and safety data" (51%), and "limiting access to expensive treatments with little net benefit" (51%) as a means of reducing health care costs. Few expressed enthusiasm for "eliminating fee-for-service payment models" (7%). Most physicians reported being "aware of the costs of the tests/treatments [they] recommend" (76%), agreed they should adhere to clinical guidelines that discourage the use of marginally beneficial care (79%), and agreed that they "should be solely devoted to individual patients' best interests, even if that is expensive" (78%) and that "doctors need to take a more prominent role in limiting use of unnecessary tests" (89%). Most (85%) disagreed that they "should sometimes deny beneficial but costly services to certain patients because resources should go to other patients that need them more." In multivariable logistic regression models testing associations with enthusiasm for key cost-containment strategies, having a salary plus bonus or salary-only compensation type was independently associated with enthusiasm for "eliminating fee for service" (salary plus bonus: odds ratio [OR], 3.3, 99% CI, 1.8-6.1; salary only: OR, 4.3, 99% CI, 2.2-8.5). In multivariable linear regression models, group or government practice setting (β = 0.87, 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.45, P = .004; and β = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.20 to 1.79, P = .01, respectively) and having a salary plus bonus compensation type (β = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.32 to 1.33; P = .002) were positively associated with cost-consciousness. Finding the "uncertainty involved in patient care disconcerting" was negatively associated with cost-consciousness (β = -1.95; 95% CI, -2.71 to -1.18; P < .001).Conclusion and relevanceIn this survey about health care cost containment, US physicians reported having some responsibility to address health care costs in their practice and expressed general agreement about several quality initiatives to reduce cost but reported less enthusiasm for cost containment involving changes in payment models.
| S-EPMC5553287 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo gather patients' and primary care physicians' (PCP) opinions on trauma-informed Care (TIC) and to investigate the acceptability of recommendations developed by patient, family, and physician advisors.DesignCross-sectional research survey design and patient engagement.SettingCanada, 2017 to 2019.ParticipantsEnglish-speaking adults and licensed PCPs residing in Canada.Main outcome measuresParticipants were given a series of questionnaires including a list of physician actions and a list of recommendations consistent with TIC.ResultsPatients and PCPs viewed TIC as important. Both patients and PCPs rated the following recommendations as helpful and likely to positively impact patient care: physician training, online trauma resource centres, information pamphlets, the ability to extend appointment times, and clinical pathways for responding to trauma. PCPs' responses were significantly more positive than patients' responses.ConclusionTIC is important to patients and PCPs. Patients and PCPs believe changes to physician training, patient engagement, and systemic factors would be helpful and likely to positively impact patient care. Future research needs to be conducted to investigate whether these recommendations improve patient care.
| S-EPMC8270182 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND: Increasing physician case volumes are documented to reduce costs and improve outcomes for many surgical procedures but not for medical conditions such as pneumonia that consume significant health care resources. OBJECTIVE: This study explored the association between physicians' inpatient pneumonia case volume and cost per discharge. DESIGN: The design was a retrospective, population-based, cross-sectional study, using National Health Insurance administrative claims data. SETTING: The setting was Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS: The participants were a universal sample of 270,002 adult, acute pneumonia hospitalizations, during 2002-2004, excluding transferred cases and readmissions. MEASUREMENTS: Hierarchical linear regression modeling was used to examine the association of physician's volume (three volume groups, designed to classify patients into approximately equal sized groups) with cost, adjusting for hospital random effects, case severity, physician demographics and specialty, hospital characteristics, and geographic location. RESULTS: Mean cost was NT$2,255 (US$1 = NT$33 in 2004) for low-volume physicians (< or =100 cases) and NT$1,707 for high-volume physicians (> or =316 cases). The adjusted patient costs for low-volume physicians were higher (US$264 and US$235 than high- and medium-volume physicians, respectively; both P < .001), with no difference between high- and medium-volume physicians. High-volume physicians had lower in-hospital mortality and 14-day readmission rates than low-volume physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Data support an inverse volume-cost relationship for pneumonia care. Decision processes and clinical care of high-volume physicians versus low-volume physicians should be studied to develop effective care algorithms to improve pneumonia outcomes and reduce costs.
| S-EPMC2359464 | biostudies-other
Project description:BACKGROUND:There is significant promise in analyzing physician patient-sharing networks to indirectly measure care coordination, yet it is unknown whether these measures reflect patients' perceptions of care coordination. OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the associations between network-based measures of care coordination and patient-reported experience measures. DESIGN:We analyzed patient-sharing physician networks within group practices using data made available by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. SUBJECTS:Medicare beneficiaries who provided responses to the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Survey in 2016 (data aggregated by physician group practice made available through the Physician Compare 2016 Group Public Reporting). MAIN MEASURES:The outcomes of interest were patient-reported experience measures reflecting aspects of care coordination (CAHPS). The predictor variables of interests were physician group practice density (the number of physician pairs who share patients adjusting for the total number of physician pairs) and clustering (the extent to which sets of three physicians share patients). KEY RESULTS:Four hundred seventy-six groups had patient-reported measures available. Patients' perception of "Clinicians working together for your care" was significantly positively associated with both physician group practice density (Est (95?%?CI)?=?5.07(0.83,?9.33),?p?=?0.02) and clustering (Est (95?%?CI)?=?3.73(1.01,?6.44),?p?=?0.007). Physician group practice clustering was also significantly positively associated with "Getting timely care, appointments, and information" (Est (95?%?CI)?=?4.63(0.21,?9.06), p?=?0.04). CONCLUSIONS:This work suggests that network-based measures of care coordination are associated with some patient-reported experience measures. Evaluating and intervening on patient-sharing networks may provide novel strategies for initiatives aimed at improving quality of care and the patient experience.
| S-EPMC6848407 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems (EPaCCS) are England's pre-eminent initiative in enabling advance care planning and improved communication and coordination at the end of life. EPaCCS have been under development for 8?years after being proposed, as Locality Registers, in the 2008 End of Life Care Strategy for England. EPaCCS are electronic registers or tools and processes for sharing data which aim to enable access to information about dying patients. Striking outcomes have been reported around EPaCCS, such as 77.8% of 'Coordinate My Care' patients dying in their preferred place. EPaCCS have, however, been extremely challenging to develop and implement, with many projects remaining continuously 'under development' or folding. They also continue to be suboptimally integrated with other data sharing initiatives. Rigorous research is non-existent. DISCUSSION POINTS:We discuss the current EPaCCS landscape and way forward. We summarise key facts concerning the availability, uptake, outcomes and costs of EPaCCS. We outline 5 key challenges (scope of projects, unrealistic expectations set by existing guidance, the discrepancy between IT realities in healthcare and our broader lives, information governance and 'death register' associations) and 6 key drivers (robust concept, striking outcomes, national support and strong clinical leadership, clinician commitment, education and funding). CONCLUSIONS:The priorities for advancing EPaCCS we propose include linking to other work streams and reframing the concept, potentially making it less 'end of life', overview of current EPaCCS and lessons learnt, continuing work on information standards, rethinking of national funding and new levels of individual and community involvement.
| S-EPMC6287568 | biostudies-other