Dataset Information

Metabolic syndrome in patients enrolled in a clinical trial of aripiprazole in the maintenance treatment of bipolar I disorder: a post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

ABSTRACT: To compare the effects of maintenance treatment with aripiprazole or placebo on the incidence of metabolic syndrome in bipolar disorder.Patients with DSM-IV bipolar I disorder were stabilized on aripiprazole therapy for 6-18 weeks prior to double-blind random assignment to aripiprazole or placebo for 26 weeks. The rate of metabolic syndrome in each group was calculated at maintenance phase baseline (randomization) and endpoint for evaluable patients using a last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) approach. Metabolic syndrome was defined using the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. The study was conducted from March 2000 to June 2003 at 76 centers in Argentina, Mexico, and the United States.At entry into the maintenance phase, 45/125 patients (36.0%) overall met criteria for metabolic syndrome. Mean changes in the 5 components of metabolic syndrome (waist circumference, triglyceride levels, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, blood pressure, and glucose level) from baseline to week 26 were small except for a meaningful reduction in triglycerides (placebo -18.9 mg/dL; aripiprazole -11.5 mg/dL). By the end of the maintenance phase (endpoint, LOCF), 5/18 placebo-treated patients (27.8%) and 4/14 aripiprazole-treated patients (28.6%) no longer met metabolic syndrome criteria. The proportion of patients with metabolic syndrome was similar in the placebo and aripiprazole groups at both baseline and week 26. There were no significant changes in any of the individual components of metabolic syndrome between aripiprazole- and placebo-treated patients during maintenance phase treatment.The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in patients with bipolar disorder is higher than that commonly reported in the general population. The effect of 26 weeks of treatment with aripiprazole on the incidence of metabolic syndrome and its components was similar to placebo.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00036348.

SUBMITTER: Kemp DE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3590811 | biostudies-literature | 2010 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Metabolic syndrome in patients enrolled in a clinical trial of aripiprazole in the maintenance treatment of bipolar I disorder: a post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Kemp David E DE Calabrese Joseph R JR Tran Quynh-Van QV Pikalov Andrei A Eudicone James M JM Baker Ross A RA

The Journal of clinical psychiatry 20100504 9

<h4>Objective</h4>To compare the effects of maintenance treatment with aripiprazole or placebo on the incidence of metabolic syndrome in bipolar disorder.<h4>Method</h4>Patients with DSM-IV bipolar I disorder were stabilized on aripiprazole therapy for 6-18 weeks prior to double-blind random assignment to aripiprazole or placebo for 26 weeks. The rate of metabolic syndrome in each group was calculated at maintenance phase baseline (randomization) and endpoint for evaluable patients using a last- ...[more]

PMID: 20492838

Similar Datasets

Project description:Rapid-cycling bipolar disorder is difficult to treat and associated with greater morbidity than non-rapid-cycling disease. This post hoc analysis evaluated 28 patients with rapid-cycling bipolar I disorder from a 100-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing long-term efficacy, safety and tolerability of aripiprazole in patients with bipolar I disorder (most recently manic/mixed).Following >or= 6 consecutive weeks' stabilisation with open-label aripiprazole, patients were randomised (1 : 1) to aripiprazole or placebo. Patients completing 26 weeks treatment without relapse could continue for a further 74 weeks. Primary end-point was time to relapse for manic, mixed or depressive symptoms, defined as discontinuation due to lack of efficacy. Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) monitoring and changes in weight and lipid, glucose and prolactin levels.Of the 28 patients (aripiprazole, n = 14; placebo, n = 14) with rapid-cycling bipolar disorder, 12 (aripiprazole, n = 7; placebo, n = 5) completed the initial 26-week treatment period and three (all aripiprazole treated) completed the 100-week, double-blind period. Time to relapse was significantly longer with aripiprazole vs. placebo at week 26 [log-rank p = 0.033; 26-week hazard ratio = 0.21 (95% CI: 0.04, 1.03)] and week 100 [log-rank p = 0.017; 100-week hazard ratio = 0.18 (95% CI: 0.04, 0.88)]. The most commonly reported AEs with aripiprazole during the 100 weeks (>or= 10% incidence and twice placebo) were anxiety (n = 4), sinusitis (n = 4), depression (n = 3) and upper respiratory infection (n = 3). One aripiprazole-treated patient discontinued due to an AE (akathisia). There were no significant between-group differences in mean changes in weight or metabolic parameters.In this small, post hoc subanalysis, aripiprazole maintained efficacy and was generally well tolerated in the long-term treatment of rapid-cycling bipolar disorder. Further research with prospectively designed and adequately powered trials is warranted.

Project description:Abstract Background: Relapse is common in schizophrenia; identifying characteristics associated with relapse may help improve disease management. Cariprazine, a D3/D2 receptor partial agonist, is approved in the United States for the treatment of schizophrenia. Post hoc analyses of a long-term, randomized, double-blind (up to 72 weeks), relapse prevention trial (NCT01412060) were performed to identify characteristics associated with relapse in placebo- and cariprazine-treated patients. Methods: Baseline characteristics in cariprazine-treated (3, 6, or 9?mg/d) or placebo-treated patients were evaluated in relation to relapse status. Demographic variables included age, sex, race, weight, and BMI. Psychiatric history variables included mean age at illness onset, duration of schizophrenia, duration of current episode, number of lifetime psychotic episodes, previous hospitalizations, and acute exacerbations in the past year. Baseline rating scale severity scores (eg, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS] and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity [CGI-S]) were evaluated. Differences in demographic and psychiatric history variables were evaluated using the Student t test (categorical variables) or Fisher exact test (continuous variables); rating scale severity scores were evaluated with 2-way ANOVA with relapse and study center as factors. Results: Relapse occurred in nearly twice as many placebo-treated (47.5%) as cariprazine-treated patients (24.8%) (hazard ratio [95% CI] = 0.45 [0.28, 0.73]). For cariprazine-treated patients who relapsed vs those who did not, significant differences were seen in baseline age (mean, 43 vs 38 y), weight (85 vs 73?kg), BMI (29 vs 26?kg/m2), and race (all, P < .05); for placebo-treated patients, there were no significant differences in demographic variables based on relapse status. In both treatment groups, patients who relapsed vs patients who did not relapse had a greater mean number of previous hospitalizations (cariprazine = 8.4 vs 4.3 [P = .0199]; placebo = 4.9 vs 2.8 [P = .0183]). Cariprazine patients who relapsed vs those who did not had longer illness duration (18.1 y vs 9.9 [P = .0005]); the number of lifetime episodes also differed by relapse status (P = .0016), with a greater percentage of relapsed patients experiencing ?5 episodes. Baseline PANSS total score and CGI-S scores were not significantly different in relapsed vs nonrelapsed patients in either treatment group. Conclusion: While patients treated with cariprazine had a lower rate of relapse than placebo overall, the results suggest that patients who were older, heavier, or had a later stage of illness may be more prone to relapse during cariprazine treatment. In patients randomized to placebo, demographic characteristics and psychiatric history were not as meaningful in predicting relapse. Greater symptom severity at baseline did not appear to be associated with relapse.

Project description:INTRODUCTION:Duloxetine has demonstrated efficacy in chronic low back pain (CLBP). We examined the predictors of response to duloxetine for CLBP. PATIENTS AND METHODS:This was a post hoc analysis of pooled data from 4 double-blind, ran-domized, placebo-controlled trials of duloxetine (60 mg/day for 12-14 weeks) in adult patients with CLBP. Primary outcome was proportion of patients with ?30% reduction in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) average pain ("pain reduction") at 12-14 weeks. The proportion of patients with ?30% and ?50% (secondary outcome) pain reduction in duloxetine and placebo groups was compared. Variables for responder analyses were early improvement (?15% pain reduction at Week 2), sex, age, baseline BPI average pain score, duration of CLBP, and number of painful body sites according to the Michigan Body Map (?2 vs 1 [isolated CLBP]; 1 trial); relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. RESULTS:Compared with placebo (n = 653), a greater proportion of duloxetine-treated patients (n = 642) achieved ?30% (59.7% vs 47.8%; P < 0.001) and ?50% pain reduction (48.6% vs 35.1%; P < 0.001). Among duloxetine-treated patients, early improvement was associated with greater likelihood of ?30% (RR [95% CI], 2.91 [2.30-3.67]) or ?50% (3.24 [2.44-4.31]) pain reduction. Women were slightly more likely than men to achieve ?30% (RR [95% CI], 1.14 [1.00-1.30]) or ?50% (1.17 [0.99-1.38]) pain reduction. Response rates were similar between age, CLBP duration, and baseline BPI average pain score subgroups. Patients with ?2 painful sites were more likely to respond to duloxetine 60 mg relative to placebo than patients with isolated CLBP (RR, duloxetine vs placebo [95% CI]: ?30% reduction, ?2 painful sites 1.40 [1.18-1.66], isolated CLBP 1.07 [0.78-1.48]; ?50% reduction, ?2 painful sites 1.51 [1.20-1.89], isolated CLBP 1.23 [0.81-1.88]). CONCLUSION:Early pain reduction was indicative of overall response. Patients with multiple painful sites had more benefit from duloxetine than patients with isolated CLBP.

Dataset Information

Metabolic syndrome in patients enrolled in a clinical trial of aripiprazole in the maintenance treatment of bipolar I disorder: a post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Publications

Metabolic syndrome in patients enrolled in a clinical trial of aripiprazole in the maintenance treatment of bipolar I disorder: a post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure