Dataset Information

THERACOM: a systematic review of the evidence base for interventions to improve Therapeutic Communications between black and minority ethnic populations and staff in specialist mental health services.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) groups in receipt of specialist mental health care have reported higher rates of detention under the mental health act, less use of psychological therapies, and more dissatisfaction. Although many explanations have been put forward to explain this, a failure of therapeutic communications may explain poorer satisfaction, disengagement from services and ethnic variations in access to less coercive care. Interventions that improve therapeutic communications may offer new approaches to tackle ethnic inequalities in experiences and outcomes.

Methods

The THERACOM project is an HTA-funded evidence synthesis review of interventions to improve therapeutic communications between black and minority ethnic patients in contact with specialist mental health services and staff providing those services. This article sets out the protocol methods for a necessarily broad review topic, including appropriate search strategies, dilemmas for classifying different types of therapeutic communications and expectations of the types of interventions to improve them. The review methods will accommodate unexpected types of study and interventions. The findings will be reported in 2013, including a synthesis of the quantitative and grey literature.

Discussion

A particular methodological challenge is to identify and rate the quality of many different study types, for example, randomised controlled trials, observational quantitative studies, qualitative studies and case studies, which comprise the full range of hierarchies of evidence. We discuss the preliminary methodological challenges and some solutions. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42011001661).

SUBMITTER: Bhui K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3599664 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

THERACOM: a systematic review of the evidence base for interventions to improve Therapeutic Communications between black and minority ethnic populations and staff in specialist mental health services.

Bhui Kamaldeep K McCabe Rosemarie R Weich Scott S Singh Swaran S Johnson Mark M Szczepura Ala A

Systematic reviews 20130225

<h4>Background</h4>Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) groups in receipt of specialist mental health care have reported higher rates of detention under the mental health act, less use of psychological therapies, and more dissatisfaction. Although many explanations have been put forward to explain this, a failure of therapeutic communications may explain poorer satisfaction, disengagement from services and ethnic variations in access to less coercive care. Interventions that improve therapeutic commu ...[more]

PMID: 23442299

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesNo large-scale randomized clinical trial investigations have evaluated the potential differential effectiveness of early interventions for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among injured patients from racial and ethnic minority backgrounds. The current investigation assessed whether a stepped collaborative care intervention trial conducted at 25 level I trauma centers differentially improved PTSD symptoms for racial and ethnic minority injury survivors.MethodsThe investigation was a secondary analysis of a stepped wedge cluster randomized clinical trial. Patients endorsing high levels of distress on the PTSD Checklist (PCL-C) were randomized to enhanced usual care control or intervention conditions. Three hundred and fifty patients of the 635 randomized (55%) were from non-white and/or Hispanic backgrounds. The intervention included care management, cognitive behavioral therapy elements and, psychopharmacology addressing PTSD symptoms. The primary study outcome was PTSD symptoms assessed with the PCL-C at 3, 6, and 12 months postinjury. Mixed model regression analyses compared treatment effects for intervention and control group patients from non-white/Hispanic versus white/non-Hispanic backgrounds.ResultsThe investigation attained between 75% and 80% 3-month to 12-month follow-up. The intervention, on average, required 122 min (SD=132 min). Mixed model regression analyses revealed significant changes in PCL-C scores for non-white/Hispanic intervention patients at 6 months (adjusted difference -3.72 (95% CI -7.33 to -0.10) Effect Size =0.25, p<0.05) after the injury event. No significant differences were observed for white/non-Hispanic patients at the 6-month time point (adjusted difference -1.29 (95% CI -4.89 to 2.31) ES=0.10, p=ns).ConclusionIn this secondary analysis, a brief stepped collaborative care intervention was associated with greater 6-month reductions in PTSD symptoms for non-white/Hispanic patients when compared with white/non-Hispanic patients. If replicated, these findings could serve to inform future American College of Surgeon Committee on Trauma requirements for screening, intervention, and referral for PTSD and comorbidities.Level of evidenceLevel II, secondary analysis of randomized clinical trial data reporting a significant difference.Trial registration numberNCT02655354.

Project description:BackgroundResource-poor individuals, such as those with a low income, are disproportionately affected by diabetes and unhealthy eating patterns that contribute to poor disease self-management and prognosis. Digitally delivered interventions have the potential to address some of the barriers to healthy eating experienced by this group. However, little is known about their effectiveness in disadvantaged populations.ObjectiveThis systematic review is conducted to assess the effectiveness of digitally delivered interventions in improving nutritional behaviors and nutrition-related health outcomes among disadvantaged people with type 2 diabetes (T2D).MethodsMEDLINE complete, Global Health, Embase, CINAHL complete, Informit Health, IEEE Xplore, and Applied Science and Technology Source databases were searched for studies published between 1990 and 2022 on digitally delivered nutrition interventions for disadvantaged people with T2D. Two reviewers independently assessed the studies for eligibility and determined the study quality using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Assessment Tool. The Behavioral Change Technique Taxonomy V1 was used to identify behavior change techniques used in the design of interventions.ResultsOf the 2434 identified records, 10 (0.4%), comprising 947 participants, met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. A total of 2 digital platforms, web and messaging services (eg, SMS text messaging interventions or multimedia messaging service), were used to deliver interventions. Substantial improvements in dietary behaviors were reported in 5 (50%) of the 10 studies, representing improvements in healthier food choices or increases in dietary knowledge and skills or self-efficacy. Of the 10 studies, 7 (70%) examined changes in blood glucose levels, of which 4 (57%) out of 7 achieved significant decreases in hemoglobin A1C levels ranging from 0.3% to 1.8%. The most frequently identified behavior change techniques across all studies were instruction on how to perform the behavior, information about health consequences, and social support.ConclusionsThis review provided some support for the efficacy of digitally delivered interventions in improving healthy eating behaviors in disadvantaged people with T2D, an essential dietary prerequisite for changes in clinical metabolic parameters. Further research is needed into how disadvantaged people with T2D may benefit more from digital approaches and to identify the specific features of effective digital interventions for supporting healthy behaviors among disadvantaged populations.Trial registrationPROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020149844; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=149844.

Project description:Background/objectivesWhile it is acknowledged that minority ethnic (ME) groups across international settings face barriers to accessing care for dementia, it is not clear whether ME groups access services less frequently as a result. The objective of this review is to examine whether ME groups have longer delays before accessing dementia/memory services, higher use of acute care and crisis services and lower use of routine care services based on existing literature. We also examined whether ME groups had higher dementia severity or lower cognition when presenting to memory services.DesignSystematic review with narrative synthesis.SettingNonresidential medical, psychiatric, memory, and emergency services.ParticipantsTwenty studies totaling 94,431 older adults with dementia or mild cognitive impairment.MeasurementsWe searched Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Global Health, and PsycINFO from inception to November 2018 for peer-reviewed observational studies which quantified ethnic minority differences in nonresidential health service use in people with dementia. Narrative synthesis was used to analyze findings.ResultsTwenty studies were included, mostly from the U.S. (n = 13), as well as the UK (n = 4), Australia (n = 1), Belgium (n = 1), and the Netherlands (n = 1). There was little evidence that ME groups in any country accessed routine care at different rates than comparison groups, although studies may have been underpowered. There was strong evidence that African American/Black groups had higher use of hospital inpatient services versus U.S. comparison groups. Primary care and emergency services were less well studied. Study quality was mixed, and there was a large amount of variability in the way ethnicity and service use outcomes were ascertained and defined.ConclusionThere is evidence that some ME groups, such as Black/African American groups in the U.S., may use more acute care services than comparison populations, but less evidence for differences in routine care use. Research is sparse, especially outside the U.S.

Project description:BackgroundCertain racial/ethnic minority groups have a higher risk of developing dementia, yet studies have demonstrated that they often have limited knowledge and understanding of this disease. An increasing number of educational and advocacy programs have been developed to promote dementia knowledge. We aimed at assessing current evidence and quality regarding educational interventions for promoting dementia knowledge.MethodsWe searched for intervention studies published in English that focused on educational interventions for promoting dementia knowledge among racial/ethnic minority groups. We identified 25 relevant studies through PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Scopus, using tailored search terms. We screened titles and abstracts, reviewed full texts, synthesized relevant evidence, and evaluated the studies' quality based on the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Relevant intervention studies took place in communities, hospitals or clinics, and schools, and online.ResultsMost studies were conducted in the United States (n = 21), followed by the UK (n = 3). Over half of the studies included Asian/Pacific Islander groups (n = 14), followed by Black groups (n = 12) and Hispanic groups (n = 11). The intervention delivery mode varied across studies-from workshops hosted in a faith community to talk shows on YouTube. Target populations included middle-aged and older adults, caregivers and family members, health students and professionals, and elementary school students. Common content included symptoms and signs of dementia, protective and risk factors, and local resources. The assessment of study outcomes varied across studies. Improvement in dementia knowledge and attitudes towards dementia was reported in many studies. Among the included studies, intervention satisfaction was high. The overall quality of the interventions was low.ConclusionFormally evaluated educational interventions promoting dementia knowledge are at an early stage. Existing published interventions showed adequate acceptability and promise in promoting better understanding and awareness of dementia in minority groups. More well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed.

Dataset Information

THERACOM: a systematic review of the evidence base for interventions to improve Therapeutic Communications between black and minority ethnic populations and staff in specialist mental health services.

Background

Methods

Discussion

Publications

THERACOM: a systematic review of the evidence base for interventions to improve Therapeutic Communications between black and minority ethnic populations and staff in specialist mental health services.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets