Dataset Information

A nonparametric procedure for defining a new humoral immunologic profile in a pilot study on HIV infected patients.

ABSTRACT: This work aims at identifying a set of humoral immunologic parameters that improve prediction of the activation process in HIV patients. Starting from the well-known impact of humoral immunity in HIV infection, there is still a lack of knowledge in defining the role of the modulation of functional activity and titers of serum antibodies from early stage of infection to the development of AIDS. We propose an integrated approach that combines humoral and clinical parameters in defining the host immunity, implementing algorithms associated with virus control. A number of humoral parameters were simultaneously evaluated in a whole range of serum samples from HIV-positive patients. This issue has been afforded accounting for estimation problems typically related to "feasibility" studies where small sample size in each group and large number of parameters are jointly estimated. We used nonparametric statistical procedures to identify biomarkers in our study which included 42 subjects stratified on five different stages of HIV infection, i.e., Elite Controllers (EC), Long Term Non Progressors (LTNP), HAART, AIDS and Acute Infection (AI). The main goal of the paper is to illustrate a novel profiling method for helping to design a further confirmatory study. A set of seventeen different HIV-specific blood humoral factors were analyzed in all subjects, i.e. IgG and IgA to gp120IIIB, to gp120Bal, to whole gp41, to P1 and T20 gp41 epitopes of the MPER-HR2 region, to QARILAV gp41 epitope of the HR1 region and to CCR5; neutralization activity against five different virus strains and ADCC were also evaluated. Patients were selected on the basis of CD4 cell counts, HIV/RNA and clinical status. The Classification and Regression Trees (CART) approach has been used to uncover specific patterns of humoral parameters in different stages of HIV disease. Virus neutralization of primary virus strains and antibodies to gp41 were required to classify patients, suggesting that clinical profiles strongly rely on functional activity against HIV.

SUBMITTER: Brombin C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3606389 | biostudies-literature | 2013

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A nonparametric procedure for defining a new humoral immunologic profile in a pilot study on HIV infected patients.

Brombin Chiara C Diomede Lorenzo L Tudor Daniela D Drillet Anne Sophie AS Pastori Claudia C Poli Elena E Riva Agostino A Uberti-Foppa Caterina C Galli Massimo M Di Serio Clelia C Bomsel Morgane M Lopalco Lucia L

PloS one 20130322 3

This work aims at identifying a set of humoral immunologic parameters that improve prediction of the activation process in HIV patients. Starting from the well-known impact of humoral immunity in HIV infection, there is still a lack of knowledge in defining the role of the modulation of functional activity and titers of serum antibodies from early stage of infection to the development of AIDS. We propose an integrated approach that combines humoral and clinical parameters in defining the host im ...[more]

PMID: 23533590

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivePrior hypothesis-driven studies identified immunophenotypic characteristics associated with the control of HIV replication without antiretroviral therapy (HIV controllers) as well as with the degree of CD4 T-cell recovery during ART. We hypothesized that an unbiased 'discovery-based' approach might identify novel immunologic characteristics of these phenotypes.DesignWe performed immunophenotyping on four 'aviremic' patient groups: HIV controllers (n = 98), antiretroviral-treated immunologic nonresponders (CD4 < 350; n = 59), antiretroviral-treated immunologic responders (CD4 > 350, n = 142), and as a control group HIV-negative adults (n = 43). We measured levels of T-cell maturation, activation, dysfunction, senescence, functionality, and proliferation.MethodsSupervised learning assessed the relative importance of immune parameters in predicting clinical phenotypes (controller, immunologic responder, or immunologic nonresponder). Unsupervised learning clustered immune parameters and examined if these clusters corresponded to clinical phenotypes.ResultsHIV controllers were characterized by high percentages of HIV-specific T-cell responses and decreased percentages of cells expressing human leukocytic antigen-antigen D related in naive, central memory, and effector T-cell subsets. Immunologic nonresponders were characterized by higher percentages of CD4 T cells that were TNFα+ or INFγ+, higher percentages of activated naive and central memory T cells, and higher percentages of cells expressing programmed cell death protein 1. Unsupervised learning found two distinct clusters of controllers and two distinct clusters of immunologic nonresponders, perhaps suggesting different mechanisms for the clinical outcomes.ConclusionOur discovery-based approach confirmed previously reported characteristics that distinguish aviremic individuals, but also identified novel immunologic phenotypes and distinct clinical subpopulations that should lead to more focused pathogenesis studies that might identify targets for novel therapeutic interventions.

Project description:IntroductionResponse to antiretroviral therapy (ART) among individuals infected with HIV-2 is poorly described. We compared the immunological response among patients treated with three nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) to boosted protease inhibitor (PI) and unboosted PI-based regimens in West Africa.MethodsThis prospective cohort study enrolled treatment-naïve HIV-2-infected patients within the International Epidemiological Databases to Evaluate AIDS collaboration in West Africa. We used mixed models to compare the CD4 count response to treatment over 12 months between regimens.ResultsOf 422 HIV-2-infected patients, 285 (67.5%) were treated with a boosted PI-based regimen, 104 (24.6%) with an unboosted PI-based regimen and 33 (7.8%) with three NRTIs. Treatment groups were comparable with regard to gender (54.5% female) and median age at ART initiation (45.3 years; interquartile range 38.3 to 51.8). Treatment groups differed by clinical stage (21.2%, 16.8% and 17.3% at CDC Stage C or World Health Organization Stage IV for the triple NRTI, boosted PI and unboosted PI groups, respectively, p=0.02), median length of follow-up (12.9, 17.7 and 44.0 months for the triple NRTI, the boosted PI and the unboosted PI groups, respectively, p<0.001) and baseline median CD4 count (192, 173 and 129 cells/µl in the triple NRTI, the boosted PI and the unboosted PI-based regimen groups, respectively, p=0.003). CD4 count recovery at 12 months was higher for patients treated with boosted PI-based regimens than those treated with three NRTIs or with unboosted PI-based regimens (191 cells/µl, 95% CI 142 to 241; 110 cells/µl, 95% CI 29 to 192; 133 cells/µl, 95% CI 80 to 186, respectively, p=0.004).ConclusionsIn this observational study using African data, boosted PI-containing regimens had better immunological response compared to triple NRTI combinations and unboosted PI-based regimens at 12 months. A randomized clinical trial is still required to determine the best initial regimen for treating HIV-2 infected patients.

Dataset Information

A nonparametric procedure for defining a new humoral immunologic profile in a pilot study on HIV infected patients.

Publications

A nonparametric procedure for defining a new humoral immunologic profile in a pilot study on HIV infected patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets