Dataset Information

Translation between the Neer- and the AO/OTA-classification for proximal humeral fractures: do we need to be bilingual to interpret the scientific literature?

ABSTRACT:

Background

The reporting and interpretation of data from clinical trials of proximal humeral fractures are hampered by the use of two partly incommensurable fracture classification systems: the Neer classification and the AO/OTA classification. It remains difficult to interpret and generalize results, to conduct prognostic studies, and to obtain consensus on treatment recommendations when concise definitions and a common 'fracture language' are lacking. Thus, we compared both classifications systems using primary data from large clinical studies to assess how thoroughly both systems conveyed clinically important classification information.

Methods

Classification data from each study were organized in a cross-table covering the 432 theoretically possible combinations between the 16 Neer categories and the 27 AO/OTA subgroups, and the plausibility of all observed combinations were assessed and discussed by the authors until consensus.

Results

We analyzed primary data from 2530 observations from seven studies providing primary data from both classification systems. Thirty-five percent (151 out of 432) of the combinations were considered 'not plausible' and thirty-four percent (149 out of 432) were considered 'problematic'.

Conclusions

Clinically important information was lost within both classification systems. Most important, the varus/valgus distinction was not found within the Neer classification and a clear definition of displacement was lacking in the AO/OTA classification. We encourage surgeons and researches to report data from both classification systems for a more thorough description of the fracture patterns and to enable cross-checking of the coding. A suitable table for cross-checking of the coding is provided herein.

SUBMITTER: Brorson S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3610277 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Translation between the Neer- and the AO/OTA-classification for proximal humeral fractures: do we need to be bilingual to interpret the scientific literature?

Brorson Stig S Eckardt Henrik H Audigé Laurent L Rolauffs Bernd B Bahrs Christian C

BMC research notes 20130225

<h4>Background</h4>The reporting and interpretation of data from clinical trials of proximal humeral fractures are hampered by the use of two partly incommensurable fracture classification systems: the Neer classification and the AO/OTA classification. It remains difficult to interpret and generalize results, to conduct prognostic studies, and to obtain consensus on treatment recommendations when concise definitions and a common 'fracture language' are lacking. Thus, we compared both classificat ...[more]

PMID: 23442552

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:The classification systems for proximal humeral fractures routinely used in clinical practice include the Neer and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 2007 systems. Currently used systems have low inter- and intraobserver reliability. In 2018, AO/OTA introduced a new classification system with the aim of simplifying the coding process, in which the Neer four-part classification was integrated into the fracture description. The aim of the present work is to assess the inter- and intraobserver agreement of the new AO/OTA 2018 compared with the Neer and AO/OTA 2007 classifications. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A total of 116 radiographs of consecutive patients with proximal humeral fracture were selected and classified by three observers with different levels of experience. All three observers independently reviewed and classified the images according to the Neer, AO/OTA 2007, and new AO/OTA 2018 systems. To determine the intraobserver agreement, the observers reviewed the same set of radiographs after an interval of 8 weeks. The inter- and intraobserver agreement were determined through Cohen's kappa coefficient analysis. RESULTS:The new AO/OTA 2018 classification showed substantial mean inter- (k = 0.67) and intraobserver (k = 0.75) agreement. These results are similar to the reliability observed for the Neer classification (interobserver, k = 0.67; intraobserver, k = 0.85) but better than those found for the AO/OTA 2007 system, which showed only moderate inter- (k = 0.57) and intraobserver (k = 0.58) agreement. The two more experienced observers showed better overall agreement, but no statistically significant difference was found. No differences were found between surgical experience and agreement regarding specific fracture types or groups. CONCLUSIONS:The results showed that the Neer system still represents the more reliable and reproducible classification. However, the new AO/OTA 2018 classification improved the agreement among observers compared with the AO/OTA 2007 system, while still maintaining substantial descriptive power and simplifying the coding process. The universal modifiers and qualifications, despite their possible complexity, allowed a more comprehensive fracture definition without negatively affecting the reliability or reproducibility of the classification system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Level III, diagnostic studies.

Project description:BackgroundMulti-fragmentary patella fractures (MFPFs) are common patella fracture type. Low-profile plate fixation seems to be promising advancement in the treatment of such difficult fractures. There is no systematic morphologic study specifically for MFPFs to provide objective reference for the improvement of future implants and biomechanical models. This study aimed to delineate and quantify the location and spatial frequency of fracture lines, comminution zones, and coronal plane fragments in MFPFs using three-dimensional (3D) CT mapping technique.MethodsA total of 187 MFPFs were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Fractures were digitally reconstructed from CT data, and fracture lines, comminution zones, and coronal fragments were graphically overlaid onto a 3D patella template. Fracture characteristics were summarized qualitatively based on the fracture maps and quantitatively on the counts and volume of each fragment. Furthermore, according to the classic fracture patterns concerning MFPFs, subgroup analysis was conducted.ResultsOn average, we observed 7 fragments in each fracture, 3 of which were <1 cm3. Most fractures (81.2%) had coronal fragments on the anterior and/or posterior patella surfaces. We identified three classic patella fracture patterns: transverse with comminution, stellate, and "displaced comminuted" in 104, 54, and 29 knees, respectively. 3D maps demonstrated distinct distribution fracture patterns of fracture lines, comminution zones, and coronal fragments.ConclusionsSupero-medial corner of the patella was seldomly involved, and might be used as the cornerstone for fixation. Coronal fragments were common on both anterior and posterior patella surfaces, justifying the application of anterior plate osteosynthesis characterized by multi-planar fixation. Comminution areas mainly concentrated in the lower half of the patella, potentially suitable for an implant in combination with sutures or circumferential cerclage wiring. The described 3D features of MFPFs could provide reference for the design of future implants and biomechanical models.

Project description:BackgroundHumeral head inferior subluxation often occurs immediately after osteosynthesis for proximal humeral fracture; however, the underlying cause remains largely unknown. In addition, the prognosis of postoperative inferior subluxation has not been fully investigated. This study aimed to clarify the predictive factors that affected the onset of postoperative inferior subluxation using multivariate analysis and examine the postoperative course of inferior subluxation and its influence on postoperative outcomes.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 212 patients who underwent osteosynthesis for Neer 2- or 3-part proximal humeral fractures. In the multivariate analysis, the dependent variable was set as the inferior subluxation observed 1 week after the surgery. The explanatory variables included age, sex, affected side, body mass index, smoking, local osteoporosis, preoperative axillary nerve injury, time from injury to surgery, fracture dislocation, fracture pattern, preoperative inferior subluxation, surgical procedure, surgical approaches, blood loss, operative time, and postoperative drainage. Baseline variables, which were observed to be significant in the univariate analysis, were included in multivariate models. Furthermore, based on the presence of inferior subluxation at 1 week after the surgery, we divided the patients into two groups: with inferior subluxation (+IS group) and without inferior subluxation (-IS group). We compared the postoperative outcomes (incidence of postoperative complications and range of motion) between these two groups.ResultsOf 212 patients, 64 (30.7%) experienced inferior subluxation at 1 week after the surgery. On multivariate analyses, preoperative inferior subluxation (odds ratio = 4.69; 95% confidence interval = 2.45-9.76; P < .001) and longer operative time (odds ratio = 1.01; 95% confidence interval = 1.00-1.02; P = .049) were the risk factors for postoperative inferior subluxation. In the +IS group, inferior subluxation resolved at 1 year after the surgery in 89.5% of patients. There was no significant difference in the postoperative outcome between the +IS and -IS groups. However, four of six patients with persistent inferior subluxation, more than 6 months after the surgery, experienced complications, such as varus angulation of the humeral head or screw joint perforation.ConclusionsThis study provides new information on the risk factors for and prognosis of postosteosynthesis inferior subluxation in patients with proximal humeral fracture. Longer operative time and presence of preoperative inferior subluxation was associated with an increased risk of postoperative inferior subluxation, although it was temporary in most cases, and had no significant influence on the postoperative outcomes. However, in patients with persistent inferior subluxation of more than 6 months duration, inferior subluxation may be related to postoperative complications.

Project description:BackgroundDistal femur fractures are complex injuries with a high rate of fracture healing problems. Since the widespread of computed tomographic imaging in the diagnosis of distal femur fractures, many fracture characteristics have been discovered. This study aimed to depict the location and frequency of distal femur fracture lines and further analyze the morphological characteristics using the 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) mapping technique, thus providing more information to solve this challenging clinical problem.MethodsIn total, 217 distal femur fractures in 216 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Fracture fragments on CT were digitally reconstructed and virtually reduced to match a template model. The contour of every fracture fragment was then marked with smooth curves, and the overlap of all fracture lines allowed for the creation of 3-dimensional fracture maps and heat maps. Fracture characteristics were summarized based on these maps.ResultsThis study included 114 left knee injuries, 101 right knee injuries, and 1 case with bilateral injury. Distal femur fractures were most likely to occur among patients aged 61 to 70 years. On the heat map of all 217 fractures, fracture line hot zones were mainly concentrated around the metaphysis, the lateral part of the intercondylar notch, and the patellofemoral joint. Distal femur fractures with three Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) types demonstrated distinct fracture characteristics. In total, there were 58 coronal plane fractures (41.1%) in 141 intercondylar fractures.ConclusionsThe intercondylar fracture patterns in AO/OTA type B and type C fractures were similar, while the supracondylar characteristics in AO/OTA type A and type C were different. The findings in this study can help orthopaedic surgeons better understand the fracture morphology on the basis of AO/OTA classification. Further studies are needed to establish a standard biomechanical fracture model and new fixation strategy for better clinical outcomes.

Project description:BackgroundWith the aging of the world's population, the social and economic implications of osteoporotic fractures are at epidemic proportions. This study was performed to test the hypothesis that a proximal humeral fracture is an independent risk factor for a subsequent hip fracture and that the risk of the subsequent hip fracture is highest within the first five years after the humeral fracture.MethodsA cohort of 8049 older white women with no history of a hip or humeral fracture who were enrolled in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures was followed for a mean of 9.8 years. The risk of hip fracture after an incident humeral fracture was estimated with use of age-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis with time-varying variables; women without a humeral fracture were the reference group. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the timing between the proximal humeral and subsequent hip fracture. Risk factors were determined on the basis of a review of the current literature, and we chose the variables that were most predictive and easily ascertained in a clinical setting.ResultsThree hundred and twenty-one women sustained a proximal humeral fracture, and forty-four of them sustained a subsequent hip fracture. After adjustment for age and bone mineral density, the hazard ratio for hip fracture for subjects with a proximal humeral fracture relative to those without a proximal humeral fracture was 1.83 (95% confidence interval = 1.32 to 2.53). After multivariate adjustment, this risk appeared attenuated but was still significant (hazard ratio = 1.57; 95% confidence interval = 1.12 to 2.19). The risk of a subsequent hip fracture after a proximal humeral fracture was highest within one year after the proximal humeral fracture, with a hazard ratio of 5.68 (95% confidence interval = 3.70 to 8.73). This association between humeral and hip fracture was not significant after the first year, with hazard ratios of 0.87 (95% confidence interval = 0.48 to 1.59) between one and five years after the humeral fracture and 0.58 (95% confidence interval = 0.22 to 1.56) after five years.ConclusionsIn this cohort of older white women, a proximal humeral fracture independently increased the risk of a subsequent hip fracture more than five times in the first year after the humeral fracture but was not associated with a significant increase in the hip fracture risk in subsequent years.

Dataset Information

Translation between the Neer- and the AO/OTA-classification for proximal humeral fractures: do we need to be bilingual to interpret the scientific literature?

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Translation between the Neer- and the AO/OTA-classification for proximal humeral fractures: do we need to be bilingual to interpret the scientific literature?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets