Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Intravenous nicardipine and labetalol use in hypertensive patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of end-organ damage in the emergency department: a subgroup analysis of the CLUE trial.


ABSTRACT:

Objective

To compare the efficacy of Food and Drug Administration recommended dosing of nicardipine versus labetalol for the management of hypertensive patients with signs and/or symptoms (S/S) suggestive of end-organ damage (EOD).

Design

Secondary analysis of the multicentre prospective, randomised CLUE trial.

Setting

13 academic emergency departments in the USA.

Participants

Eligible patients had two systolic blood pressure (SBP) measures ?180 mm Hg at least 10 min apart, no contraindications to nicardipine or labetalol and predefined S/S suggestive of EOD on arrival.

Interventions

Medications were administered by continuous infusion (nicardipine) or repeat intravenous bolus (labetalol) for a study period of 30 min or until a specified target SBP ±20 mm Hg was achieved.

Primary outcome measure

Percentage of participants achieving a predefined target SBP range (TR) defined as an SBP within ±20 mm Hg as established by the treating physician.

Results

Of the 141 eligible patients, 49.6% received nicardipine, 51.7% were women and 81.6% were black. Mean age was 52.2±13.9 years. Median initial SBP did not differ in the nicardipine (210.5 (IQR 197-226) mm Hg) and labetalol (210 (200-226) mm Hg) groups (p=0.862). Nicardipine patients were more likely to have a history of diabetes (41.4% vs 25.7%, p=0.05) but there were no other historical, demographic or laboratory differences between groups. Within 30 min, nicardipine patients more often reached the target SBP range than those receiving labetalol (91.4% vs 76.1%, difference=15.3% (95% CI 3.5% to 27.3%); p=0.01). On multivariable modelling with adjustment for gender and clinical site, nicardipine patients were more likely to be in TR by 30 min than patients receiving labetalol (OR 3.65, 95% CI 1.31 to 10.18, C statistic=0.72).

Conclusions

In the setting of hypertension with suspected EOD, patients treated with nicardipine are more likely to reach prespecified SBP targets within 30 min than patients receiving labetalol.

Clinical trial registration

NCT00765648, clinicaltrials.gov.

SUBMITTER: Cannon CM 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3612758 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Intravenous nicardipine and labetalol use in hypertensive patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of end-organ damage in the emergency department: a subgroup analysis of the CLUE trial.

Cannon Chad M CM   Levy Phillip P   Baumann Brigitte M BM   Borczuk Pierre P   Chandra Abhinav A   Cline David M DM   Diercks Deborah B DB   Hiestand Brian B   Hsu Amy A   Jois Preeti P   Kaminski Brian B   Nowak Richard M RM   Schrock Jon W JW   Varon Joseph J   Peacock W Frank WF  

BMJ open 20130326 3


<h4>Objective</h4>To compare the efficacy of Food and Drug Administration recommended dosing of nicardipine versus labetalol for the management of hypertensive patients with signs and/or symptoms (S/S) suggestive of end-organ damage (EOD).<h4>Design</h4>Secondary analysis of the multicentre prospective, randomised CLUE trial.<h4>Setting</h4>13 academic emergency departments in the USA.<h4>Participants</h4>Eligible patients had two systolic blood pressure (SBP) measures ≥180 mm Hg at least 10 min  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3219031 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4380379 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9747609 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6824910 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5935002 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8029868 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10372116 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5576624 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6371567 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8031903 | biostudies-literature