Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Controversy exists over antidepressant use in rapid-cycling bipolar disorder.Aims
Exploratory analysis of safety and efficacy of fluoxetine v. lithium monotherapy in individuals with rapid- v. non-rapid-cycling bipolar II disorder.Method
Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of fluoxetine v. lithium monotherapy in patients initially stabilised on fluoxetine monotherapy (trial registration NCT00044616).Results
The proportion of participants with depressive relapse was similar between the rapid- and non-rapid-cycling groups (P = 0.20). The odds of relapse were similar between groups (P = 0.36). The hazard of relapse was similar between groups (hazard ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.40-1.91). Change in mania rating scores was similar between groups (P = 0.86). There was no difference between groups in the rate of syndromal (P = 0.27) or subsyndromal (P = 0.82) hypomania.Conclusions
Depressive relapse and treatment-emergent mood conversion episode rates were similar for lithium and fluoxetine monotherapy and placebo during long-term, relapse-prevention therapy of rapid- and non-rapid-cycling bipolar II disorder.
SUBMITTER: Amsterdam JD
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3613721 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Apr
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Amsterdam Jay D JD Luo Lola L Shults Justine J
The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science 20121025 4
<h4>Background</h4>Controversy exists over antidepressant use in rapid-cycling bipolar disorder.<h4>Aims</h4>Exploratory analysis of safety and efficacy of fluoxetine v. lithium monotherapy in individuals with rapid- v. non-rapid-cycling bipolar II disorder.<h4>Method</h4>Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of fluoxetine v. lithium monotherapy in patients initially stabilised on fluoxetine monotherapy (trial registration NCT00044616).<h4>Results</h4>The proportion of particip ...[more]