Unknown

Dataset Information

0

An inferential framework for biological network hypothesis tests.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Networks are ubiquitous in modern cell biology and physiology. A large literature exists for inferring/proposing biological pathways/networks using statistical or machine learning algorithms. Despite these advances a formal testing procedure for analyzing network-level observations is in need of further development. Comparing the behaviour of a pharmacologically altered pathway to its canonical form is an example of a salient one-sample comparison. Locating which pathways differentiate disease from no-disease phenotype may be recast as a two-sample network inference problem. RESULTS: We outline an inferential method for performing one- and two-sample hypothesis tests where the sampling unit is a network and the hypotheses are stated via network model(s). We propose a dissimilarity measure that incorporates nearby neighbour information to contrast one or more networks in a statistical test. We demonstrate and explore the utility of our approach with both simulated and microarray data; random graphs and weighted (partial) correlation networks are used to form network models. Using both a well-known diabetes dataset and an ovarian cancer dataset, the methods outlined here could better elucidate co-regulation changes for one or more pathways between two clinically relevant phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Formal hypothesis tests for gene- or protein-based networks are a logical progression from existing gene-based and gene-set tests for differential expression. Commensurate with the growing appreciation and development of systems biology, the dissimilarity-based testing methods presented here may allow us to improve our understanding of pathways and other complex regulatory systems. The benefit of our method was illustrated under select scenarios.

SUBMITTER: Yates PD 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3621801 | biostudies-literature | 2013

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

An inferential framework for biological network hypothesis tests.

Yates Phillip D PD   Mukhopadhyay Nitai D ND  

BMC bioinformatics 20130314


<h4>Background</h4>Networks are ubiquitous in modern cell biology and physiology. A large literature exists for inferring/proposing biological pathways/networks using statistical or machine learning algorithms. Despite these advances a formal testing procedure for analyzing network-level observations is in need of further development. Comparing the behaviour of a pharmacologically altered pathway to its canonical form is an example of a salient one-sample comparison. Locating which pathways diff  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC2912702 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9297917 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7728203 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5719532 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC8664367 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7006466 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3135422 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9561355 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9334420 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6150474 | biostudies-literature