Dataset Information

The efficacy of bevacizumab compared with other targeted drugs for patients with advanced NSCLC: a meta-analysis from 30 randomized controlled clinical trials.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The extent of the benefit of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still unclear. We performed this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of bevacizumab with other commonly used targeted drugs for different patients with advanced NSCLC.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and abstracts from the proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and identified 30 randomized controlled clinical trials published within 1999 to 2011 for meta-analysis.

Results

The outcomes of treatment efficacy included response rate, PFS and OS. Comparing bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) with chemotherapy to standard chemotherapy alone, for chemotherapy-naïve patients, the pooled OR of response rate was 2.741(95%CI: 2.046, 3.672), the pooled HR for disease progression was 0.645 (95%CI: 0.561, 0.743), and the pooled HR for death was 0.790 (95%CI: 0.674, 0.926), respectively. In addition, the adjusted HR for previously-treated patients was 0.680 (95%CI: 0.492, 0.942) comparing bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy to standard chemotherapy alone.

Conclusions

Bevacizumab accompanied by chemotherapy was found to significantly improve patients' response rate, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) among chemotherapy-naïve patients compared to other targeted drugs in the treatment of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

SUBMITTER: Cui J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3628504 | biostudies-literature | 2013

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The efficacy of bevacizumab compared with other targeted drugs for patients with advanced NSCLC: a meta-analysis from 30 randomized controlled clinical trials.

Cui Jianlan J Cai Xueya X Zhu Min M Liu Tianshu T Zhao Naiqing N

PloS one 20130416 4

<h4>Background</h4>The extent of the benefit of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still unclear. We performed this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of bevacizumab with other commonly used targeted drugs for different patients with advanced NSCLC.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and abstracts from the proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and identified 30 randomized ...[more]

PMID: 23614008

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cancer associated with a poor prognosis. Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds vascular endothelial growth factor, a mediator of tumor angiogenesis. Bevacizumab is currently under investigation as treatment for HCC. We performed a systematic review of the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab for the treatment of advanced HCC.MethodsPubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched using the terms "bevacizumab AND hepatocellular carcinoma AND (advanced OR unresectable)". Phase II trials of bevacizumab for the treatment of advanced HCC were included. Outcomes of interest included progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS), tumor response, and toxicities.ResultsA total of 26 records were identified. Of these, 18 were excluded. Hence, eight trials involving 300 patients were included. Bevacizumab was given as monotherapy (n?=?1 trial) or in combination with erlotinib (n?=?4 trials), capecitabine (n?=?1 trial), capecitabine+oxaliplatin (n?=?1 trial), or gemcitabine+oxaliplatin (n?=?1 trial). Most trials (five of eight) reported median PFS and OS between 5.3 months and 9.0 months and 5.9 and 13.7 months, respectively. The disease control rate was consistent in five of eight trials, ranging from 51.1% to 76.9%. The response and partial response rates ranged from 0 to 23.7%, but were around 20% in four trials. Only one patient had a complete response. Frequently reported Grade 3/4 toxicities were increased aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase (13%), fatigue (12%), hypertension (10%), diarrhea (8%), and neutropenia (5%). Thirty patients experienced gastrointestinal bleeding (grade 1/2?=?18, grade 3/4?=?12), typically due to esophageal varices.ConclusionsBevacizumab shows promise as an effective and tolerable treatment for advanced HCC. The reported efficacy of bevacizumab appears to compare favorably with that of sorafenib, the only currently approved treatment for unresectable HCC. Phase III trials are warranted to comprehensively examine the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab for treatment of advanced HCC.

Project description:BackgroundPulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a devastating disease and ultimately leads to right heart failure and premature death. A total of four classical targeted drugs, prostanoids, endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE-5Is), and soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator (sGCS), have been proved to improve exercise capacity and hemodynamics compared to placebo; however, direct head-to-head comparisons of these drugs are lacking. This network meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively compare the efficacy of these targeted drugs for PAH.MethodsMedline, the Cochrane Library, and other Internet sources were searched for randomized clinical trials exploring the efficacy of targeted drugs for patients with PAH. The primary effective end point of this network meta-analysis was a 6-minute walk distance (6MWD).ResultsThirty-two eligible trials including 6,758 patients were identified. There was a statistically significant improvement in 6MWD, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, and clinical worsening events associated with each of the four targeted drugs compared with placebo. Combination therapy improved 6MWD by 20.94 m (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.94, 34.94; P=0.003) vs prostanoids, and 16.94 m (95% CI: 4.41, 29.47; P=0.008) vs ERAs. PDE-5Is improved 6MWD by 17.28 m (95% CI: 1.91, 32.65; P=0.028) vs prostanoids, with a similar result with combination therapy. In addition, combination therapy reduced mean pulmonary artery pressure by 3.97 mmHg (95% CI: -6.06, -1.88; P<0.001) vs prostanoids, 8.24 mmHg (95% CI: -10.71, -5.76; P<0.001) vs ERAs, 3.38 mmHg (95% CI: -6.30, -0.47; P=0.023) vs PDE-5Is, and 3.94 mmHg (95% CI: -6.99, -0.88; P=0.012) vs sGCS. There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality and severe adverse events between prostanoids, ERAs, PDE-5Is, sGCS, combination therapy, and placebo.ConclusionAll targeted drugs for PAH are associated with improved clinical outcomes, especially combination therapy. However, all these drugs seem to show less favorable effects on survival in the short-term follow-up, suggesting further clinical trials are required.

Project description:ObjectiveAngiogenesis plays an important role in the growth and metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Bevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that mainly acts on vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA). Kinase insert domain receptor (KDR) is the most important target of VEGFA. The aim of present study was to investigate the influence of KDR genetic variation on the efficacy and safety of patients with advanced NSCLC receiving first-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy regimen.MethodsA total of 169 patients with advanced NSCLC who received bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy were recruited in this study. Clinical outcome of the regimens was evaluated in the hospital. Peripheral blood and biopsy tissue specimens of patients were collected for the genotyping of KDR genetic variation and KDR mRNA expression, respectively. The association between KDR genotype status and other variables were analyzed. Univariate analysis of genotype status and prognosis was implemented using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis method. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to adjust the confounding factors.ResultsOf the polymorphisms analyzed, only V297 L was of clinical significance. The prevalence of V297 L among the study population were as follows: CC genotype 123 cases (72.8%), CT genotype 41 cases (24.3%), TT genotype 5 cases (2.9%). The minimum allele frequency is 0.15. The distribution frequencies of the 3 genotypes corresponded with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P = 0.489). Patients with TT and CT genotypes were merged in the subsequent comparison of clinical outcomes. The analysis of efficacy exhibited that the objective response rates (ORR) of patients with CC genotype and CT/TT genotypes were 52.8% and 47.8% (P = 0.561), respectively. Prognosis indicated that the median progression free survival (PFS) of patients with CC genotype and CT/TT genotype were 8.9 and 5.5 months, respectively (P = 0.006). The median OS of the 2 genotypes were 20.0 and 14.9 months, respectively (P = 0.021). Adjusted in multivariate Cox regression analysis of PFS, CT/TT genotypes were an independent factor for PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.59, P = 0.011). Safety profile according to genotype status of V297 L failed to find significant difference. Interestingly, the expression of KDR mRNA of patients with CT/TT genotype was significantly higher than that of patients with CC genotype in the 58 cancer tissue specimens (P < 0.001).ConclusionThe clinical comes of patients with advanced NSCLC receiving first-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy regimens might be impacted by polymorphism V297 L through mediating the mRNA expression of KDR.

Dataset Information

The efficacy of bevacizumab compared with other targeted drugs for patients with advanced NSCLC: a meta-analysis from 30 randomized controlled clinical trials.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

The efficacy of bevacizumab compared with other targeted drugs for patients with advanced NSCLC: a meta-analysis from 30 randomized controlled clinical trials.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure