Dataset Information

Test-retest reliability of computational network measurements derived from the structural connectome of the human brain.

ABSTRACT: Structural magnetic resonance (MR) connectomics holds promise for the diagnosis, outcome prediction, and treatment monitoring of many common neurodevelopmental, psychiatric, and neurodegenerative disorders for which there is currently no clinical utility for MR imaging (MRI). Before computational network metrics from the human connectome can be applied in a clinical setting, their precision and their normative intersubject variation must be understood to guide the study design and the interpretation of longitudinal data. In this work, the reproducibility of commonly used graph theoretic measures is investigated, as applied to the structural connectome of healthy adult volunteers. Two datasets are examined, one consisting of 10 subjects scanned twice at one MRI facility and one consisting of five subjects scanned once each at two different facilities using the same imaging platform. Global graph metrics are calculated for unweighed and weighed connectomes, and two levels of granularity of the connectome are evaluated: one based on the 82-node cortical and subcortical parcellation from FreeSurfer and one based on an atlas-free parcellation of the gray-white matter boundary consisting of 1000 cortical nodes. The consistency of the unweighed and weighed edges and the module assignments are also computed for the 82-node connectomes. Overall, the results demonstrate good-to-excellent test-retest reliability for the entire connectome-processing pipeline, including the graph analytics, in both the intrasite and intersite datasets. These findings indicate that measurements of computational network metrics derived from the structural connectome have sufficient precision to be tested as potential biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of interventions in neurological and psychiatric diseases.

SUBMITTER: Owen JP

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3634151 | biostudies-literature | 2013

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Test-retest reliability of computational network measurements derived from the structural connectome of the human brain.

Owen Julia P JP Ziv Etay E Bukshpun Polina P Pojman Nicholas N Wakahiro Mari M Berman Jeffrey I JI Roberts Timothy P L TP Friedman Eric J EJ Sherr Elliott H EH Mukherjee Pratik P

Brain connectivity 20130101 2

Structural magnetic resonance (MR) connectomics holds promise for the diagnosis, outcome prediction, and treatment monitoring of many common neurodevelopmental, psychiatric, and neurodegenerative disorders for which there is currently no clinical utility for MR imaging (MRI). Before computational network metrics from the human connectome can be applied in a clinical setting, their precision and their normative intersubject variation must be understood to guide the study design and the interpreta ...[more]

PMID: 23350832

Similar Datasets

Project description:The majority of human connectome studies in the literature based on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data use either an anterior-to-posterior (AP) or a posterior-to-anterior (PA) phase encoding direction (PED). However, whether and how PED would affect test-retest reliability of functional connectome is unclear. Here, in a sample of healthy subjects with two sessions of fMRI scans separated by 12 weeks (two runs per session, one with AP, the other with PA), we tested the influence of PED on global, nodal, and edge connectivity in the constructed brain networks. All data underwent the state-of-the-art Human Connectome Project (HCP) pipeline to correct for phase-encoding-related distortions before entering analysis. We found that at the global level, the PA scans showed significantly higher intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for global connectivity compared with AP scans, which was particularly prominent when using the Seitzman-300 atlas (versus the CAB-NP-718 atlas). At the nodal level, regions most strongly affected by PED were consistently mapped to the cingulate cortex, temporal lobe, sensorimotor areas, and visual areas, with significantly higher ICCs during PA scans compared with AP scans, regardless of atlas. Better ICCs were also observed during PA scans at the edge level, in particular when global signal regression (GSR) was not performed. Further, we demonstrated that the observed reliability differences between PEDs may relate to a similar effect on the reliability of temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR) in the same regions (that PA scans were associated with higher reliability of tSNR than AP scans). Averaging the connectivity outcome from the AP and PA scans could increase median ICCs, especially at the nodal and edge levels. Similar results at the global and nodal levels were replicated in an independent, public dataset from the HCP-Early Psychosis (HCP-EP) study with a similar design but a much shorter scan session interval. Our findings suggest that PED has significant effects on the reliability of connectomic estimates in fMRI studies. We urge that these effects need to be carefully considered in future neuroimaging designs, especially in longitudinal studies such as those related to neurodevelopment or clinical intervention.

Dataset Information

Test-retest reliability of computational network measurements derived from the structural connectome of the human brain.

Publications

Test-retest reliability of computational network measurements derived from the structural connectome of the human brain.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets