Is the indicator magnifying window for insulin pens helpful for elderly diabetic patients?
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Lee JH
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3638226 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Apr
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Is the indicator magnifying window for insulin pens helpful for elderly diabetic patients?
Lee Ju Hee JH Hong Eun Shil ES Ohn Jung Hun JH Cho Young Min YM
Diabetes & metabolism journal 20130416 2
Patients with type 2 diabetes who require insulin therapy are commonly elderly and have poor visual acuity. In this study, we examined the clinical usefulness of the indicator magnifying window (IMW) for elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. We recruited 50 patients with type 2 diabetes over the age of 60 who had used insulin pens for glucose control. They were asked to set the insulin pen at randomly selected doses with or without an IMW. We assessed dosing accuracy, convenience, self-confiden ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundDiabetes mellitus (DM) is a prevalent disease among elderly population. As the disease progresses, insulin may become necessary. The use of pens application seems to be more practical. However, the influence of this method on glycemic control needs to be defined in elderly people.MethodsRandomized clinical trial comparing pens and syringes for insulin application among patients with type 2 DM over 60 years old and Glycated Hemoglobin > 8.5% at baseline. The follow-up was 24 weeks, with monthly medical visits to adjust the treatment. All patients received insulin NPH and, if necessary, insulin Regular. We assessed glycemic control, adherence to treatment, hypoglycemia occurrence, need for adjustment in treatment and impact on quality of life, RESULTS: We included 121 patients with mean age of 65.75 years. Sixty-one were randomized for pen group (PG) and 60 patients for syringe group (SG). At baseline, mean HbA1c was 10.34 ± 1.66% and 9.90 ± 1.25% (p = 0.103) in PG and SG respectively. Mean HbA1c was 8.39 ± 1.28% in PG and 8.85 ± 1.74% in SG (p = 0.101) at 24 weeks. However, there was a more significant reduction in PG (- 1.94 ± 1.93% in PG and - 1.04 ± 1.46% in SG, p < 0.05) during follow-up. We found no difference in treatment adherence rates, hypoglycemia, greater need for insulin doses or oral medication, and progression to basal-bolus insulin scheme. We also found no difference in the impact of the disease on quality of life between groups.ConclusionAlthough we did not find any difference in the impact on quality of life, frequency of hypoglycemia or adherence, the PG showed a reduction in HbA1c higher in 24 weeks of follow-up.Clinical trial registrationNCT02517242.
| S-EPMC8196455 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionPrevious studies have found higher rates of adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using insulin pens compared to vial and syringe administration; however, little evidence is available to support this observation in elderly patients.MethodsThis was a retrospective claims database analysis of a predominantly elderly Medicare Advantage with Prescription Drug (MAPD) insurance population consisting of 3172 insulin-naïve patients with T2DM who initiated basal insulin using pre-filled pens or vial and syringe ('vial'). The index date was defined by the first pharmacy claim for basal insulin. Adherence, measured as proportion of days covered (PDC) and medication possession ratio (MPR), and persistence were evaluated in a 12-month follow-up period using an adjusted days' supply. Multivariate regression analyses and a Cox proportional hazards model were used to identify characteristics associated with adherence and non-persistence, respectively, and compare findings between the pen and vial groups.ResultsThe pen cohort was slightly younger than the vial cohort (69.4 vs. 70.1 years, respectively; P = 0.0338). Similar proportions of male patients (53.3% vs. 56.8%; P = 0.0529) occurred in both cohorts, and lower Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index (4.4 vs. 5.0; P < 0.0001) was found for the pen cohort. Adjusted mean PDC was significantly higher in the pen cohort than the vial cohort (0.67 vs. 0.50; P < 0.001), as was mean MPR (0.75 vs. 0.57; P < 0.0001). Adjusted odds for adherence (PDC ≥ 80%) showed a positive association with use of an insulin pen (odds ratio = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.86-2.59). The adjusted risk of non-persistence (discontinuation) was significantly lower (58%) in the pen cohort relative to the vial cohort (hazard ratio = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.38-0.45). Key limitations include assumptions related to accuracy and comprehensiveness of claims data, and specifically days' supply data used to measure insulin adherence.ConclusionThese findings suggest that pen devices improved insulin therapy adherence in a primarily elderly MAPD population with T2DM.FundingNovo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
| S-EPMC4679781 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Digital health management is increasingly pivotal in the care of patients with diabetes. The aim of this review was to evaluate the clinical benefits of using smart insulin pens with connectivity for diabetes management. The search was performed using PubMed and PubMed Central on May 15, 2019, to identify publications investigating the use of insulin pens. Studies evaluating insulin pens with connectivity via Bluetooth/Near Field Communication, with an associated electronic device enabling connectivity, or with a memory function were included in the review. Nine studies were identified in the search. Overall, these studies lacked data on smart insulin pens with a connectivity function, with eight of the available studies investigating only pens with a memory function. The studies focused primarily on assessing patient preference, usability, and technical accuracy. The number of studies assessing clinical outcomes was small (n = 3). However, the majority of studies (n = 8) reported that patients preferred smart insulin pens because they increased confidence with regard to diabetes self-management. These results suggest a lack of published data regarding smart insulin pens with connectivity for the management of diabetes. However, the available published data on usability and patient preference suggest that the use of smart insulin pens holds promise for improving and simplifying diabetes self-management.
| S-EPMC9158248 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThis study quantified how people with diabetes value the unique features of connected insulin pens and related mobile apps, and the underlying reasons for preferring connected versus non-connected insulin pens.MethodsA discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted in the USA and UK to elicit preferences of adults (≥ 18 years) with type 1 or 2 diabetes for attributes of insulin pens. Attributes included device type, dosing support, glucose monitoring, additional app features, and data sharing. Relative attribute importance (RAI) scores were calculated to capture the relative importance of an attribute. Predicted choice probabilities were obtained to compare different profiles for connected and non-connected insulin pens.ResultsThe DCE was completed by 540 participants (58.9% male; 90.7% Caucasian; mean age, 58.3 years; 69.4% type 2 diabetes). Participants most valued the possibility of using a connected insulin pen with dosing support and automated dose logging (RAI = 39.9%), followed by automatic transfer of glucose levels (RAI = 29.0%), additional features of tracking diet and physical activity (RAI = 14.6%), data sharing (RAI = 13.6%), and device type (RAI = 2.9%). All profiles of connected insulin pens were preferred over a non-connected pen (p < 0.001), and pen profiles with advanced features were preferred over those without (p < 0.001). Preferences differed by age but not diabetes type, country of residence, or insulin regimen.ConclusionPeople with diabetes in the USA and UK prefer connected over non-connected insulin pens due largely to the availability of automated logging of dose and glucose levels.
| S-EPMC9911509 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Glide force, average glide force, and glide force variability of the insulin lispro 200 units/mL pen (Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA) were compared to the Humalog KwikPen 100 units/mL pen (hereafter, KwikPen; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Data were collected on 2 doses, 2 injection speeds, and 2 needle types. Insulin lispro 200 units/mL pen showed significantly lower maximum glide force, average glide force, and glide force variability than the KwikPen across all combinations of dose size, dose speed, and needle type. The lower glide force observed with the insulin lispro 200 units/mL pen offers another treatment option for patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who require greater than 20 units of mealtime insulin daily.
| S-EPMC4604579 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in elderly patients are still being defined. To identify novel miRNA biomarker candidates for monitoring responses to sitagliptin in such patients, we prospectively studied 40 T2D patients (age?>?65) with HbA1c levels of 7.5-9.0% on metformin. After collection of baseline blood samples (t0), the dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) inhibitor (DPP-IVi) sitagliptin was added to the metformin regimen, and patients were followed for 15 months. Patients with HbA1c?<?7.5% or HbA1c reduction?>?0.5% after 3 and 15 months of therapy were classified as "responders" (group R, n = 34); all others were classified as "nonresponders" (group NR, n = 6). Circulating miRNA profiling was performed on plasma collected in each group before and after 15 months of therapy (t0 and t15). Intra- and intergroup comparison of miRNA profiles pinpointed three miRNAs that correlated with responses to sitagliptin: miR-378, which is a candidate biomarker of resistance to this DPP-IVi, and miR-126-3p and miR-223, which are associated with positive responses to the drug. The translational implications are as immediate as evident, with the possibility to develop noninvasive diagnostic tools to predict drug response and development of chronic complications.
| S-EPMC5914089 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe recommended chronic kidney disease (CKD) first-line diagnostic test is based on the creatinine-derived (estimated) glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Cystatin C use may provide a better assessment.MethodsWe compared creatinine- and cystatin C-derived eGFR determination as the first-line diagnostic test for 112 hospital patients aged > 60 years (median = 76 years). The patients were judged to not have CKD (no-CKD group) according to the first-line diagnostic recommendations (n = 61, eGFR (CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI)) ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, total urine protein < 150 mg/g creatinine, urinary red/white blood cells not increased) or classified to be at risk for kidney insufficiency due to aortic valve dysfunction (at-risk group; n = 51). The accuracy of the eGFR values was evaluated retrospectively with the final case diagnoses.ResultsThe eGFR (Caucasian, Asian, pediatric, and adult formula (CAPA)) was found to be linearly correlated to the eGFR (CKD-EPI) (R2 = 0.5, slope = 0.69, p < 0.0001). In 93/112 (>80%) cases, the eGFR (CAPA) yielded lower values (on average ≈-20%). In 55/112 (49%) cases, the cystatin C-derived CKD stage was lower. CKD reclassification from no-CKD to a kidney-insufficient state (i.e., CKD1/2 to CKD3a/b or 4) or reclassification to a more severe kidney insufficiency (i.e., CKD3a → 3b/4 or 3b → 4) was found in 41/112 (37%) cases. A worse CKD classification (no-CKD → kidney-insufficient) based on the eGFR (CAPA) was plausible in 30% of cases in light of the final case diagnoses.ConclusionIn elderly patients (>60 years), renal function appears to be systematically overestimated by the creatinine-based eGFR (CKD-EPI), indicating that, for this group, the cystatin C-based eGFR (CAPA) should be used as the first-line diagnostic test.
| S-EPMC10742602 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe mortality of dialysis patients greatly exceeds that of the general population and identifying predictive factors for mortality may provide opportunities for earlier intervention. This study assessed the influence of sarcopenia on mortality in patients on haemodialysis.MethodsThis prospective, observational study enrolled 77 haemodialysis patients aged 60 years and over, of whom 33 (43%) were female, from two community dialysis centres. Baseline demographic and laboratory data were collected, and sarcopenia was diagnosed using grip strength, muscle mass by bioimpedance analysis (BIA) and muscle function by timed up-and-go according to European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People criteria. Nutritional status was assessed using a subjective nutritional assessment score, comprising functional changes in weight, appetite, gastrointestinal symptoms and energy.. A comorbidity score (maximum 7 points) was derived from the presence or absence of hypertension, ischaemic heart disease, vascular disease (cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, and abdominal aortic aneurysm), diabetes mellitus, respiratory disease, a history of malignancy and psychiatric disease. Outcomes over six years were linked to the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry.ResultsThe median participant age was 71 years (range 60-87). Probable and confirmed sarcopenia was present in 55.9% and severe sarcopenia with reduced functional testing in 11.7%. Over 6 years, overall mortality was 50 of the 77 patients (65%), principally from cardiovascular events, dialysis withdrawal and infection. There were no significant survival differences between patients with no, probable, confirmed, or severe sarcopenia, or between tertiles of the nutritional assessment score. After adjustment for age, dialysis vintage, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and the total comorbidity score, no sarcopenia category predicted mortality. However, the total comorbidity score [Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.27, Confidence Intervals (CI) 1.02, 1.58, p = 0.03] and MAP (HR 0.96, CI 0.94, 0.99, P = < 0.01) predicted mortality.ConclusionSarcopenia is highly prevalent in elderly haemodialysis patients but is not an independent predictor of mortality. Haemodialysis patients have multiple competing risks for mortality which, in this study, was predicted by a lower MAP and a higher total comorbidity score.Trial registrationRecruitment commenced December 2011. The study was registered 10.01.2012 with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12612000048886).
| S-EPMC10199600 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionErgonomic dialing torque may enhance safety and comfort when setting doses with insulin pens. Limited data are available on the correlation of dialing torque and dialing comfort.MethodsThree studies were performed with SoloSTAR(®) (SS; Sanofi), FlexPen(®) (FP; Novo Nordisk), KwikPen(®) (KP; Eli Lilly) and FlexTouch(®) (FT; Novo Nordisk) pens. Dialing behavior was examined with 20 pen-experienced people with diabetes. Participants dialed up to the maximum dose and back down to "zero" with each pen. Hand and pen movements were recorded by video camera and rotational speeds and angles calculated for each pen. In a laboratory study, dialing torque was measured discontinuously at a speed of 120°/s, reflecting typical patient behavior. Sixteen pen-experienced people with diabetes participated in a pilot preference study. Using a Likert scale, subjective dialing comfort rankings and ratings were obtained for each pen type and matched to their dialing torque. SS, FP, KP, and FT1 were investigated at 0-20 U each and at 60-80 U for FT2.ResultsSS was ranked most comfortable for up-dialing by 8 and down-dialing by 6 of the 16 participants, respectively; FP, 5 and 8; FT1, 2 and 1; and KP, 1 and 1. FT2 was ranked least comfortable by 12 and 10 participants. Comfort for up- and down-dialing was rated "very comfortable" for SS by 15 participants each, followed by FP (12 and 14), KP (10 each), and FT1 (9 and 7); FT2 was rated "less" or "not" comfortable by 10 and 11 people, respectively.ConclusionIn this pilot study, subjective ratings of dialing comfort for different insulin pens by participants appear to concur with previous laboratory dialing torque study results. There appears to be a "torque comfort zone." Torques above 50 N mm reduced subjective handling comfort. Further, larger scale studies are needed to establish that dialing torque affects pen users' comfort.
| S-EPMC4374073 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMembers of the aging population who undergo surgery are at risk of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). Exploring an effective and reliable early predictor of POCD is essential to the identification of high-risk patients and to making prospective decisions. The purpose of this study was to examine whether preoperative insulin resistance is an independent predictor of POCD.MethodsA total of 124 patients aged 60 years and older and who were scheduled for gastrointestinal surgery were enrolled in a prospective observational clinical study. All participants completed a battery of neuropsychological tests before surgery and 7 days later. POCD was defined as a decline of at least 1.5 SD on two or more of neuropsychological tests. Plasma concentration of the tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), C-reactive protein (CRP), and S-100β protein were measured. The status of insulin resistance was assessed by Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR). The relationship between HOMA-IR and POCD was assessed by Multivariable logistic regression models and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.ResultsFifty one patients (41.1%) were diagnosed with POCD at 7 days after surgery. Preoperative HOMA-IR values of the POCD group were significantly higher than the non-POCD group. Furthermore, CRP and TNF-α levels of the POCD group were significantly higher at each postoperative time point (P < 0.05). The preoperative HOMA-IR value was an independent predictor of POCD (adjusted OR 1.88, 95% CI, 1.18-2.99) even after adjust for confounding variables, and when dichotomized, individuals above the HOMA-IR threshold (HOMA-IR > 2.6) had a three-times higher risk of POCD (OR 3.26; 95% CI, 1.07-9.91) compared to individuals below the threshold. The areas under the ROC curve of HOMA-IR was 0.804 (95% CI, 0.725-0.883; P < 0.001). The optimal cut-off value was found to be 0.583, with a sensitivity of 84.3% and specificity of 74%. The HOMA-IR value was positively associated with the TNF-α concentration at baseline (R 2 = 0.43, P < 0.01) and 1 day after surgery (R 2 = 0.3861, P < 0.01).ConclusionPreoperative insulin resistance is an effective predictor for the occurrence of POCD. Targeted prevention and treatment strategies of insulin resistance may be effective interventions of patients at risk for POCD.
| S-EPMC6694405 | biostudies-literature